10 user 44 critic

Watermark (2013)

1:21 | Trailer

Watch Now

From $2.99 (SD) on Amazon Video

A documentary on how water shapes humanity.
2 wins & 3 nominations. See more awards »





A documentary on how water shapes humanity.

Plot Summary | Add Synopsis

Plot Keywords:

water | f rated | one word title | See All (3) »



Motion Picture Rating (MPAA)

Rated PG for some smoking images | See all certifications »


Official Sites:



| | | |

Release Date:

11 October 2013 (Canada)  »

Also Known As:

Marcas da Água  »

Filming Locations:


Box Office

Opening Weekend:

$8,000 (USA) (4 April 2014)


$82,837 (USA) (9 May 2014)

Company Credits

Production Co:

Show detailed on  »

Technical Specs



See  »

Frequently Asked Questions

This FAQ is empty. Add the first question.

User Reviews

Babies and puppies selling a political agenda
1 July 2014 | by See all my reviews

I have recently watched two political documentaries. First, The Unknown Known. Second, Watermark.

The first one is about glorifying a psychopath. It tells of his exploits as he uses humanity as subjects of his experiments. Its only saving grace is its honesty as it is unquestionably political.

The second one is this one, Watermark, and it has absolutely none of this honesty. It is a documentary that uses the awesomeness of nature to disguise political propaganda. It is essentially babies and puppies. Cheap manipulation to sneak in an ideology.

A number of these "nature" documentaries is being made nowadays. Big, big, big money is being given to "friendly" folks in the movie industry. Pockets full of cash, they are taking their skills around the world (literally) and making visually high-quality films. Unfortunately, the price of this funding is a script that makes adults cringe.

Consequently, this kind of "nature" documentaries is meant to be played in mute. Mozart, Armstrong, (or Pink Floyd if that's your preference) are far superior material to listen to while enjoying the unspeakable magnificence of our planet.

Watermark is also boring at times. The political obsession coupled with a jejune understanding of society and culture compromises the choice of visual subject. If they cannot use as a weapon to hurl at you, they won't show it.

6 of 31 people found this review helpful.  Was this review helpful to you?

Contribute to This Page