Criminal (2016) Poster

(2016)

User Reviews

Review this title
287 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
5/10
Mixed but very watchable thriller.
Rawin19814 June 2016
Warning: Spoilers
No spoilers if you've seen the trailer (oh and the trailer really is one of those where if you've seen it, then you've seen all the best bits).

Criminal on paper looks like a safe bet, it's produced by super 'B' movie producer Avi Lerner (Olympus/London has fallen, Expendables) has an A list cast and a much worn premise, along the lines of Face Off or Ryan Reynolds lukewarm thriller from 2015 Self/less, involving body/mind swap sci-fi, while being set in a present day surrounding.

The premise, Reynolds young spy has his memory's implanted into Kevin Costners gruff, violent criminal by Dr Tommy Lee Jones, overseen by mostly shouty Spy boss Gary Oldman, to stop some bad men doing bad things with hacking and missiles. Costner's criminal escapes and goes on a bit of a rampage through London whilst also wrestling his own violent nature against Reynolds softer character traits seeping through (so basically he's got a bit of a split personality going on).

In other words it's a silly high concept plot line to effectively have Costner run around a city, beat up some bad guys, get into shoot outs, chases and save the day.

He also along the way tracks down Gal Gadot who is Reynolds wife, and by far the best at delivering anything near a believable character, followed by Tommy Lee Jones (in a very restrained role) in a very mixed bag of a movie.

The film was made for around 30 million dollars, so don't expect much big blockbuster action, although the few car chases and explosions there are, are done decently, the film still at times feels quite cheap. The pace is a little off as well as its a bit of a slog and feels longer than it should at times.

In terms of tone it's violent, full of bad language, and seems to think both of those pass as humour, they don't in the context they are used in this film and are frankly pretty misjudged.

The performances vary, by far the worst being Gary Oldman who whilst normally excellent simply feels like he's in another film altogether at times, he literally shouts his scenes of dialogue at times when it seems a quieter authority would have been better suited.

As for leading man Costner, he's playing a pretty unlikeable fella here, so you would expect the filmmakers to try and inject some charm for an audience to sympathize or grow some kind of emotional attachment, but no Costner simply grunts and swears through most scenes in a gruff lazy drool, he's watchable as always but doesn't have much to work with here, though they do try to have him form a Bond with mother and child later on its quite late in proceedings.

There's some good touches, Gal Gadot brings out a softer side of Costner's character, there's a decent mix of Electro music and the film score used is atmospheric, some of the visuals are decent, shots of London for example and the action scenes whilst only short bursts are clear to see and not confusing and finally there's the thriller plot aspect of the story that plays like a standard spy/action thriller as our (anti) hero must set out to stop the villains and save the girl.

In closing, mixed performances, misplaced serious tone with violent outbursts of humour, some decent action but a bit of misguided film, watchable, not terrible but quite frustrating given the fact there's a better movie in there that could of got out.

3 out of 5.
65 out of 93 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Criminal: Thankfully an all-star Cast.
niutta-enrico13 July 2016
This film has been saved by its stars: Ryan Reynolds first and Kevin Costner few minutes later will make you forget most of plot's unbelievable logical holes, awful editing (what's Alice Eve's end?), repetitive scenes and complete lack of bad guy's motive (Jordi Mollà).

And Tommy Lee Jones, Gal Gadot, Gary Oldman and Michael Pitt (Alice Eve here is little more than an extra) strive to fill with workmanship and dignity their otherwise gaunt supporting roles.

They all succeed in saving the day and in the end you won't fall asleep or leave theater in contempt. But on your way home you could probably comment that this is one of the most useless (or unconvincing) films you ever watched.
93 out of 141 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
OK flick
85122217 July 2016
Greetings from Lithuania.

"Criminal" (2016) is kinda "been there saw that" type of flick - nothing original, nothing super exciting, but as a one evening guilty pleasure it does it's job, at least partly.

The cast is superb, and everyone did their OK jobs for the material, except for Tommy Lee Jones - this is "you got to be kidding me" type of performance - he goes with one facial expression during whole flick, expression that says "what am i doing here? what is this thing?".

Overall, nice execution and OK story with some fun acting makes this flick work for one boring evening. There is even some descent music in it, the one in the van and the one at very end - closing song was great.
60 out of 93 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
and, yet.
cdcrb16 April 2016
Warning: Spoilers
everything is wrong with this movie. the plot makes no sense. with the exception of Costner, the acting is pretty bad. especially gary oldman. (sorry). snippets are borrowed from almost every movie ever made. including a scene where the hero sews himelf up surgically (see Harrison ford), which itself was stolen from a 40's noir. nothing makes any sense. no one acts in a logical way, although I don't know how one would act under these circumstances. they put ryan Reynold's brain in kevin Costner. ryan has a secret which a lot of folks want. something about blowing up the world, I think. and off we go from there. that's it. and yet, and yet I had a good time. maybe I wasn't on the edge of my seat, but I was having fun with all this. the whole thing moves right along at a fast pace and there is a totally illogical happy ending. it's a perfectly wonderful Saturday afternoon at the movies.
50 out of 87 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Criminally underrated
mattslim33317 April 2016
Criminal has been slated in most reviews I've read, so I went into this film expecting very little from it. However, the film is actually considerably better than these reviews suggest and has some clever ideas running through it. It's all about the memories of Bill Pope, played by Ryan Reynolds, being transferred into Jericho Stewart, played by Kevin Costner. Both actors do well with what they are given, and Costner is particularly impressive when he has to deal with his own thoughts and Pope's as well. This memory transplant is done so a task can be completed, and you'll understand why if you watch the film. The start of the film is very intense and really pulls in your interest, with a selection of plots being introduced and I felt they all connected quite nicely at the end. The script is a bit lacklustre and uses swearing for effect rather than proper character development, although this isn't totally lacking, as Stewart tries to connect with Pope's family, which develops the story and characters quite nicely.

The action sequences provide nothing new or inventive to the genre, but they are well done and they always feel like a payoff for decent storytelling. The primary issue I had with Criminal is the middle section, which becomes very lacklustre and slow, and to be honest is a bit boring. I know most films slow down at some stage, but this one lost my interest a bit, which is never a good sign. We get to see a lot of Gel Gadot here, and she plays a good part and acts well alongside Costner. However the film picks up again with a pretty good final third, although again, nothing new is shown and the action is slightly generic. The film ends well, and the clever principles of this film are not lost through the seen it all before action scenes.

So overall, Criminal is film with clever ideas but has generic action sequences which does not merit these ideas, despite the action being entertaining. The acting is good, but the script is lacklustre and the middle section is slow. Criminal is worth a watch, but it won't win any awards despite it being a decent crack at the action film genre.
30 out of 50 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Costner delivers!
JohnDeSando5 May 2016
"You hurt me…I hurt you worse." Jericho (Kevin Costner)

Costner is the titular bad guy, who is implanted with the memory of deceased CIA operative, Bill Pope (Ryan Gosling—don't expect to see much of him as he dies early), and spends the better part of Criminal dealing with emotions new to him. It's a film rife with clichés but engaging largely because Costner is believable as a monster turned humanist. And the supporting cast is first-rate.

While this thriller is rife with electronics ( the bad guy has hacked into the USA's military computer system), the humanism is what strikes me as satisfying: not just Jericho's assuming Pope's affections but also Gary Oldman's CIA officer, Quaker Wells, sliding into a rage and Jordi Malla's head terrorist, Xavier, just being cool. I also must acknowledge that the growing affection between Jericho and Pope's widow, Jill (Gal Gadot), is believable if not just as improbable as their planting her deceased husband's thoughts and memories in Jericho.

In thrillers like Criminal, we've seen before the action sequences with vulnerable helicopters, racing cop cars, and ominous computer screens. What we haven't seen much of is a bad-boy hero who captures our sympathy immediately so that we care what happens to him regardless of the mayhem he causes in his journey. Costner has the stature and mien to carry this ambiguous hero right into our hearts.

"You don't remember me but I remember you," says young daughter, Emma Pope (Lara Decaro). Out of the mouths of babes come wisdom and the hope of love for a soulless murderer whose life is transformed by modern technology. Who would have thought technology could grant humanity? Besides, it's fun.
23 out of 37 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Worth Seeing Even if You Feel You've Seen Before
dpandlisa22 April 2016
I decided to buy a matinée ticket on a rainy day for this movie based on its terrific cast, and I wasn't disappointed. Yes, it feels like a cousin of Face/Off. Yes, there are tremendous conveniences in the story. Yes, it is predictable. However, if you like the cast and if you like action movies with some surprises then it is worth seeing. Costner brings his star power to the role of Jericho, a man with no social skills due to his underdeveloped frontal lobes, which were damaged as a child (in a touching story). Therefore it's fun to watch him steal a vehicle right in front of people, walk to the front of lines and punch people just because he can. I was happy to see Gal Gadot in a bigger role than I expected. And I spent most of the movie trying to figure out who one of the villains was, as I recognized her from another role but couldn't place it. She is very distinctive (and very beautiful), and at the end I realized it was Antje Traue, the East German actress who played a super villain in 2013's Man of Steel. Overall, the movie is good enough for a entertaining matinée at the movies.
26 out of 43 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Another good movie critics got wrong!
Cinema_Kane31 March 2023
This film is a perfect example of why movie critics are completely irrelevant. Solid acting, well paced, an interesting story (while somwhat implausible) with relatable character dynamics, and of course Costner is great ... so why the Metacritic score of 36? WTF? It's at the point where I'll take the User opinions over the critics every damn time, because clearly there's some underlying bias that comes with being a professional critic of something as subjective as filmmaking. Is it Costner? Is that it? Because they roundly hated "3000 Miles To Graceland" too, another fun movie which may not be Oscar worthy, but nevertheless. And there are definitely some Costner duds out there (Waterworld, The Postman), but I can tell you this, I would watch "Criminal" 100 times before I'd ever force myself to watch "Nomadland" again!
7 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Why I avoided this film when it was released
jasontheterrible9 June 2018
I despise movies where the premise is beyond credible. So after reading the reviews I decided I did not want to see another Face Off type transplant story. But wow, was I ever wrong. What I was missing is one of the best characters ever created by an actor and that was Kevin Costner's doing. He develops a totally believable and absolutely impeccable portrait of a sick psychopath who is greatly affected by an unapproved medical procedure. What is great is that he is not politically correct, weak, or conflicted. It makes him incredibly interesting in the age of weak males pandering to everyone. He gets to glimpse a normal life through the eyes of a strong man who is also moral which is the Ryan Reynolds character. He also gets to feel the love of a daughter and beautiful wife which he had never known before. All of the actors are great but Costner raised my opinion of his acting ability by a mile. The story and production is also excellent with an ending that is quite satisfying.
164 out of 205 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
An under rated movie
bbv-6923721 February 2023
Warning: Spoilers
While annoying some pundits by killing off Ryan Reynolds in the film's beginning, the movie's main failure was to try and make it uncomplicated and more action oriented for the American audiences. By removing the strong role that Reynold's character had in the book, and was probably filmed but later edited out in the final stages of production, the movie became disjointed and too simplistic. Likewise, the role of the CIA boss played by Gary Oldman was just overblown and ridiculous - he was a Harrison Ford on steroids (frantic beyond belief). I would not be surprised that if the original film was obtained and it was re-edited and re-produced to more closely follow the book, and not some cheap American action flick, it could be made into a very good movie.
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Awful.
denvergrown30323 February 2017
Warning: Spoilers
Awful. Just awful. From start to finish. The plot is based on everyone being stupid and inept except for Kevin Costner. Kevin plays a criminal who's been locked away for most of his life, but he bests everyone in the movie: doctors, police officers, criminal masterminds, Russian KGB, U.S. federal agents. Everyone. Oh and apparently the U.S. connected their entire nuclear arsenal to an easily hack-able Wi-Fi network. Submarines too, they have Wi-Fi that you can hack even when they're under water.
36 out of 66 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Excellent film, Excellent acting, Excellent production.
mbm9000-788-1312418 October 2023
This is a great movie and a great story. Extremely action-packed, and entertaining. All the actors in this film really shine and their characters are very believable. Gary Oldman and Kevin Costner really put in a great performance. This movie does not deserve all the negativity or bad reviews. Some folks complain that the concept or the plot is not believable, but if that's what's stopping you then that's a very lame excuse to give it bad marks. There are films out there today that are so over the top and ridiculous, compared to this top notch thriller. There's a lot of horrible movies out there and this isn't one of them. If you gave it a bad review in the beginning, please give it a second viewing and another chance.
9 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
One-Sided 'Face/Off'
stevendbeard14 April 2016
Warning: Spoilers
I saw "Criminal", starring Kevin Costner-3 Days To Kill, Man of Steel; Gary Oldman-Robocop, The Dark Knight movies; Tommy Lee Jones-Captain America:The First Avenger; Gal Gadot-Batman v Superman:Dawn of Justice and Ryan Reynolds-Deadpool, Adventureland.

This is a sci-fi/spy movie about a mind transplant. Remember the 1997 'Face/Off', with Nicolas Cage & John Travolta? It's kind of like that, but one-sided, what with one of them being dead, both minds go into one body. Ryan is a CIA operative that is on the run in London, after putting a sought after hacker called 'The Dutchman' into a safe house. Problems arise when Ryan gets caught and killed by the bad guys-without giving up the safe house, of course. Gary is head of the CIA branch in London and comes up with a plan to transfer Ryan's memories into someone, so they can find the hacker. He just happens to track down a doctor, Tommy, that has been experimenting with this exact brain transferal, but only on rats, so far. The only available human subject available, on such short notice, is Kevin, a condemned sociopath on death row. The surgery is done but does not seem to work, so Kevin is escorted back to prison. Guess what? He escapes and the memories start ebbing into his mind. Gal plays Ryan's wife. Kevin goes back and forth between having no feelings and not caring between right and wrong to remembering Gal and other key bits of information. Now, the bad guys and the good guys want him and the chase is on. It's rated "R" for violence and language and has a running time of 1 hour & 53 minutes. I enjoyed it enough that I would buy it on DVD.
20 out of 34 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Criminally wasted
Prismark105 August 2017
Warning: Spoilers
Criminal is a convoluted and messy film that rips off Face/Off and The Bourne Identity type of movies.

Young CIA agent Bill Pope (Ryan Reynolds) is tortured and electrocuted to death in London by a Spanish anarchist who is after a Dutch hacker that Bill is protecting.

The CIA operative Quaker Wells (Gary Oldman) keeps Bill from being brain dead and asks Dr Franks (Tommy Lee Jones) to do an experimental procedure to transfer Bill's memories to a dangerous and violent top security prisoner Jerico Stewart (Kevin Costner) qualified for this medical procedure as he has an underdeveloped frontal lobe.

Jerico seeks out Bill's widow Jillian (Gal Gadot) and his daughter and slowly he gains Bill's memories as well as skills.

There is an all star cast but they are manly wasted. Ryan Reynolds is killed off early into the film. Oldman shouts a lot, Lee Jones just makes a wasted cameo. Costner plays his gruff, unsympathetic character which he has been playing for the last quarter of a century.

The film is really a B film with some naff special effects, choppy editing and sloppy writing.
20 out of 36 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An okay diversion despite some significant flaws
Wizard-829 July 2016
Warning: Spoilers
First of all, I feel that I should warn potential viewers of "Criminal" that while the ads and the critic quotes used on the Blu- ray box brand the movie as an action movie, it really isn't. Yes, there is action, but it's kind of sporadic. And when the action does come, it usually concludes very quickly. The movie is more of a thriller instead of an action-packed enterprise.

So now you know the actual path the movie takes, the question comes as to whether the path it takes is done well enough. Well, the results are kind of mixed. First, the negative stuff. There is some sloppy writing here and there that raises some glaring questions. (For example: How did the bad guys escape from the authorities during the bridge sequence? And how did the bad guys get Kevin Costner's character out of the library without anyone seeing them?)

Another problem is that I don't think the premise is exploited enough. The idea of the movie - a psychopath being injected with the memory and abilities of a secret agent - is indeed a great one. But the actual execution felt a little lacking. I'm not quite sure why, I admit, but I think the main problem is that we don't see Kevin Costner's character struggle enough between those two extremes. With more of a struggle, there might have been a lot more drama and tension.

The movie also moves a tad slow at times. But I have to admit that despite the somewhat leisurely pace at times - and those aforementioned problems - I wasn't really bored at any time. The movie always have something going on that kept me interested. So while I don't think the movie reached its full potential, there's enough here to make it acceptable rainy day viewing.
12 out of 19 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
"What a F***ING MESS" (dialog, Gary Oldman, 1:09 timestamp)
A_Different_Drummer24 April 2016
Warning: Spoilers
Well first of all any movie that puts Costner, Lee Jones and Oldman back in front of the camera deserves our attention. Also fun to see Adkins in a purely supporting role that does not involve him breaking buildings with his elbows.

Second, any movie that literally kills off Ryan Reynolds in the first five minutes you know is going to be .... interesting.

Well, to skip ahead to the verdict, this movie is strangely fun and engrossing in spite of its many plot holes and script errors.

What plot holes you ask? Well, not to give too much away (because I am recommending the movie) you need to remember that the entire story is about an attempt to save the world by "transplanting" memories from a dead man to a live one, that this is done for the first time on a human, and that time is of the essence.

OK, with that firmly in mind, you will watch the movie and notice that, in spite of the above, on NOT ONE BUT TWO OCCASIONS the character played by Oldman decides the whole thing is simply not working and essentially throws Costner's character away the way a fisherman throws a fish back into the ocean.

Following which mayhem ensues and he regrets it.

Yes this is indeed a plot device to move things along (in real life people are not that stupid) but the writers use the device not once but TWICE. By the second time, the viewer is going whhaaaa ... didn't we learn anything from the last time???

If you can dig deep within yourself and find the grace to forgive these small failings, not a bad film.
16 out of 30 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Hard to rate the film, but Kevin Coster's acting is a ten.
Fred_Mopkopf30 March 2021
Warning: Spoilers
I won't say much about the film. Sort the reviews by helpfulness and you in about will get my opinion. I will only say as much: After reading the cast list I expected something less ... bland? I can't actually put my finger on it. There is less of Tommy Lee Jones and Gary Oldman than one would have liked, but they're aptly cast and show the good performances you'd expect from them. But I want to point your attention to Costner's acting. If I told you in advance what kind of character he plays, you would expect something familiar from experience - but it's not exactly what you get. Costner does much more with the role than expected. His character is multi-faceted: A mixture between brutal animal, a bit of a mentally challenged person and some traits he 'inherits' through the film's core procedure. And Costner knows what to do with that. He brings the torn character to screen in a gripping way. There is more to the usual Costner deadpan approach we know from whenever he doesn't play the nice guy. Watch closely, you won't be disappointed.
5 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Descent watch.
kyliem1116 April 2016
Kevin Costner is well cast as a dispensable criminal used in an experiment to take the thoughts of a dead CIA agent, Bill Pope (Ryan Reynolds), in order to relay his thoughts to the authorities. All does not go to plan however, and it's a chase for the CIA to get the information before the crime lord Xavier Heimdahl (Jordi Mollà) does.

Tommy Lee Jones makes a good job of playing Dr Franks and it's nice to see Gal Gadot (Wonder Woman) as Pope's widow.

The movie takes a little while to really get going but stick with it, although a bit clichéd, there is plenty of action and it's a descent watch.
15 out of 29 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Kinda sequel to A Perfect World
czombosistvan22 December 2021
Maybe that is why I liked it and that is why Kevin Costner was so good in it. Playing the same character. Not so logical, but enjoyable, give it a go.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
A Great Suspense Movie From Start To Finish.
anopenmindedlady17 April 2016
Criminal is a 2016 American action thriller drama film directed by Ariel Vromen and written by Douglas Cook and David Weisberg. The film is about an ex-con who is implanted with a dead CIA agent's memories to finish an assignment. The film stars Kevin Costner, Gary Oldman and Tommy Lee Jones in their second collaboration following the 1991 film JFK.

The memories and skills of deceased CIA agent Bill Pope are implanted into gruff convict, Jericho Stewart, in order to finish an incomplete mission.

Handsome Actor Ryan Reynolds plays the role of a CIA agent in London, he struggles to come back to to his home base. Two opponents are chasing him, the CIA and a team of terrorists. When the terrorists come closer to the CIA agent a series of breathtaking incidents will happen and the dramatic climax comes and will definitely please all the audience who love Great Action Movies.
203 out of 310 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Don't listen to the haters
andymorton-829094 December 2021
I often feel people are far to critical of some movies, this would fall into that category. Solid action thriller, good cast, good action and a few comical lines. Ignore the low ratings!
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Stupidity at Breakneck Speed
leftbanker-124 December 2018
Warning: Spoilers
This movie gave me déjà vu, at least at first it did until I remembered that I had tried to watch it before and stopped after my limited intelligence was insulted.

So I understand that we are called on to suspend belief for the bit about transferring memory from one person to the other. That is what fiction is all about. What I can't accept is how they put the guy's memories into a head of a maniac and then the guy's wife is left on her own, even after enough time has passed to realize that something has gone wrong with the plan. Stupidity is not what fiction should be based upon.

They have the ability to track a man running through the streets and metro of London but an alarm sounds in the house of the wife of the prime player in the story, they call the house and a man answers, and he's able to call them off? Stupid. Really stupid.

A day later he's driving around in a work van he stole the night before. As I said, they can track an individual sprinting through the streets but they can't find this vehicle? He may as well be cruising around London on a parade float.

And then there is comically evil bad guy, who shouts out muu-ha-ha-haa every now and again. OK, he doesn't really but that's about the only evil guy cliché they left out.

Then there is The Dutchman. What a stupid name! Have you ever heard the one about a thousand monkeys with typewriters writing Shakespeare if they had enough time? It only took one monkey to come up with The Dutchman in two minutes with no typos. Bravo! Give him a couple of Red Bulls and a pizza and he could rock out the entire screenplay by quitting time.

"We need to find Jerico." Two people utter this moronic and completely obvious statement. What else could they say? "I need to spend less on car insurance."

And then he goes back to his home, and again, it isn't guarded.

And then it gets really stupid, so stupid that I lost all memory of this movie. Two days from now I'll forget it again, but I'll have this review to remind me that I hated it.

I can't even believe that so many people liked this.
25 out of 50 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Entertaining, Highly Emotional and Violent Sci-Fi Thriller with Heart
LeonLouisRicci18 September 2016
Pulp Sci-Fi Thriller that Blows Over its High-Concepts, like Memory Transfer, with Penny-a-Word Hastiness. But this Underrated Entertainment is just that, Entertaining.

Forget the Egg-Head Cranks, Kick-Back and have Fun with this Star-Studded Romp that is Highly Emotional, Endearing, Violent, and an Anti-Hero worth Rooting for.

Kevin Costner is Involving, Gary Oldman almost Destroys any Balance of Good Sense and Cleverness in His First Scene confronting Costner's "Jericho", but manages to Recover for some Redemption by the Feel-Good Ending.

This is a Familiar Story but Twisty Enough to make it Fresh. Tommy Lee Jones Walks through His Minor Part, but the rest of the Cast comes through working with the "Comic-Book" Script. Lara Decaro is the Heart of the Movie as a Little Girl who Warms up the Films Cold Premise.

Overall, Criminally Underrated Mainstream Movie that makes up for its Shallowness and Clichés with a Rapid Pace, Good Thrill Kills, and Costner's Commitment to the Role. This is one of those Big-Name Attractions that Critics Love to Hate for not being Intelligent and Opting for a By-the-Numbers Scenario.

These Prudes have Forgotten that Movies at their Least can be Forgiven a lot of Things if it Simply Entertains. This Fun Film does just that and maybe a bit More.
40 out of 55 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
I expected a government crime thriller but what I actually got was a psychopath with a tough pair of fists.
cmovies-9967415 October 2017
PROS: This movie was intense, that's for sure. I was really shook by the whole experience. From the first 10 minutes with RYAN REYNOLDS I knew that I bitten off more than I could chew with this movie. I enjoyed the finesse in which the director was able to conduct the movie. Although I was startled by the movie at first, I really got to see what the director wanted to get across to the audience. He had a vision and it was well broadcasted. From the opening scene to the closing I was at the edge of my seat and completely entranced. I couldn't not see the finale of the film because I had previously got so invested in the process.

PROS: The con is simple... ACTING! I don't understand how it is so hard to convey an emotion that the script has pretty much written out for you. You can't try to pull an emotion out of thin air, that's when it becomes unrealistic and shows through the film as being wicked fake. The director had the main character as being someone that it was OK to dislike, but when you got to the end you were supposed to like him. I didn't like him at all. It's hard to like someone when they act fake. That unbalanced vibe that the acting gave to the film is just plain disrespectful.

www.chorror.com
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Not good, why do people keep saying its good?!
cassidyorme13 July 2016
Warning: Spoilers
this movie has so many plot holes and undeveloped, no depth characters that I'm am surprised all these idiots are saying its a good movie.. this is only a good movie if you never seen a Jason bourne film, or a mission impossible film, or even a freaking Steven segal flick... seriously I'm supposed to believe that this guy can control nuclear missiles and all they have is a couple of cars and a helicopter to find him.. hahaha this movie is pathetic! Why don't you ask jack Bauer how to stop them he's only one guy and he does more than the whole room full of people in this movie

how do films like this keep making it into theaters.. hire me ill make sure crap like this never sees the light of day.. this script needed a page one re-write!
24 out of 48 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed