At the time of this review this movie had a 6.9 rating. I took my chances and ordered it for $6.99 on our pay per view platform to enjoy with my teenage son for movie night. One good thing that came out of this movie was the bonding that my son and I had while laughing at how bad this movie was. It really is a shame because it could've been great with better execution. The storyline felt rushed, lacked character development, very unrealistic scenarios, and casting and acting were at times so bad it was embarrassing. I have spent $7 on worse movies and at least the plot itself was enjoyable. I definitely would recommend waiting until this is out in a streaming platform vs paying to see this movie individually.
8 Reviews
Pretty generic natural disaster movie...
paul_haakonsen26 February 2024
When I sat down to watch the 2024 movie "Planetquake", I had never heard about it. And I figured that chances were high that this would be a movie from none other than The Asylum. And true enough, it is The Asylum that was behind this movie. And with that fact, I have to admit that I didn't really harbor much of any grand expectations to the movie. But I still opted to watch it, and give writer and director Monroe Robertson the benefit of the doubt.
Truth be told, then every now and again The Asylum do spew out movies that actually are worthwhile watching.
The storyline from writer and director Monroe Robertson is pretty straightforward, playing on every single generic trope of the natural disaster genre. So, while he was playing it safe, you know what you are in for here, for better or worse. It did, however, make for a somewhat generic viewing experience, as there wasn't anything thrilling or new brought to the genre of natural disaster movies.
The acting performances in "Planetquake" were actually fair, taking into consideration the premise of the script and storyline. There were a couple of familiar faces on the cast list, with the likes of Michael Paré, Erica Duke and Phillip Andre Botello. Yep, I've seen enough dubious low budget movies to be familiar with Erica Duke and Phillip Andre Botello.
20 minutes into the movie, Dr. Milly Anderson (played by Erica Duke) said, and I kid you not, "How can we slow the tectonic plates?" The premise of that sentence is just so ludicrous. And that is pretty much the epitome of the writing skills here.
The effects in "Planetquake" are all over the place. Some of the effects are downright of questionable and laughable, and you don't really buy into the disastrous events that takes place, because the effects are so wooden and rigid. But other effects actually look good and somewhat realistic enough, which makes this movie somewhat of a jumble of emotions because of the effects. And I love how localized some of the earthquakes are, totally annihilating one building but not a scratch on the adjacent buildings.
The intentions to make a grand scale disaster movie was definitely there, I will give writer and director Monroe Robertson that much. Just how well it was accomplished on the screen, well that is a whole other story.
Ultimately, then "Planetquake" turned out as I expected it to, for better or worse. I will just chalk it up as yet another run-of-the-mill movie from The Asylum watched and notched off of the list.
My rating of "Planetquake" lands on a generous four out of ten stars, as it is not the worst of dumpster fires to be spewed out by The Asylum.
Truth be told, then every now and again The Asylum do spew out movies that actually are worthwhile watching.
The storyline from writer and director Monroe Robertson is pretty straightforward, playing on every single generic trope of the natural disaster genre. So, while he was playing it safe, you know what you are in for here, for better or worse. It did, however, make for a somewhat generic viewing experience, as there wasn't anything thrilling or new brought to the genre of natural disaster movies.
The acting performances in "Planetquake" were actually fair, taking into consideration the premise of the script and storyline. There were a couple of familiar faces on the cast list, with the likes of Michael Paré, Erica Duke and Phillip Andre Botello. Yep, I've seen enough dubious low budget movies to be familiar with Erica Duke and Phillip Andre Botello.
20 minutes into the movie, Dr. Milly Anderson (played by Erica Duke) said, and I kid you not, "How can we slow the tectonic plates?" The premise of that sentence is just so ludicrous. And that is pretty much the epitome of the writing skills here.
The effects in "Planetquake" are all over the place. Some of the effects are downright of questionable and laughable, and you don't really buy into the disastrous events that takes place, because the effects are so wooden and rigid. But other effects actually look good and somewhat realistic enough, which makes this movie somewhat of a jumble of emotions because of the effects. And I love how localized some of the earthquakes are, totally annihilating one building but not a scratch on the adjacent buildings.
The intentions to make a grand scale disaster movie was definitely there, I will give writer and director Monroe Robertson that much. Just how well it was accomplished on the screen, well that is a whole other story.
Ultimately, then "Planetquake" turned out as I expected it to, for better or worse. I will just chalk it up as yet another run-of-the-mill movie from The Asylum watched and notched off of the list.
My rating of "Planetquake" lands on a generous four out of ten stars, as it is not the worst of dumpster fires to be spewed out by The Asylum.
Even if just for a laugh...
paulclaassen29 February 2024
When I decided to watch 'PlanetQuake' I was in the mood for a 'bad' B-movie. In that regard, the movie did not disappoint - which isn't really saying much.
When a nuclear bomb detonates on the seabed, it causes a series of earthquakes and tsunamis. Now, a group of very knowledgeable people - lead by Dr. Milly Anderson (Erica Duke) - must try to prevent an impending doomsday disaster.
Helping Milly is Peter Houston (Phillip Andre Botello), who knows his way around computers, and her brother Dresden (Doug Jeffery), who used to be in service of the National Security Agency. (Quite a handsome silver daddy, if I dare say!) Together, they devise a bold - and unbelievable - plan to save the planet.
From the acting to the dialogue and the visuals, 'PlanetQuake' is definitely a B-movie. The visuals are cheap, but hey, I could see they tried really hard. Not every disaster movie is awarded a big budget. The dialogue wasn't that great and at times I found they were spoon-feeding the audience with information instead of showing it.
If you don't set your expectations too high, I'm sure you'll have a good (enough) time with 'PlanetQuake' - even if it is just for a laugh...
When a nuclear bomb detonates on the seabed, it causes a series of earthquakes and tsunamis. Now, a group of very knowledgeable people - lead by Dr. Milly Anderson (Erica Duke) - must try to prevent an impending doomsday disaster.
Helping Milly is Peter Houston (Phillip Andre Botello), who knows his way around computers, and her brother Dresden (Doug Jeffery), who used to be in service of the National Security Agency. (Quite a handsome silver daddy, if I dare say!) Together, they devise a bold - and unbelievable - plan to save the planet.
From the acting to the dialogue and the visuals, 'PlanetQuake' is definitely a B-movie. The visuals are cheap, but hey, I could see they tried really hard. Not every disaster movie is awarded a big budget. The dialogue wasn't that great and at times I found they were spoon-feeding the audience with information instead of showing it.
If you don't set your expectations too high, I'm sure you'll have a good (enough) time with 'PlanetQuake' - even if it is just for a laugh...
Pretty Much What You Get With Asylum Movies
stuart-wise4 March 2024
Many of the Asylum movies pretty much are predictable in terms of the quality of the plot, the acting and the special effects, so no reason to be disappointed since going in you know it won't be Oscar worthy. Having said that, I found it entertaining enough that I feel no need to bash every aspect of it. I will say that at times it was too talky and too technical, especially when the trio of world savers were trying to figure out how to do it. I don't if I am imagining it, but it seems the character of Dr. Millie Anderson said "I don't know why I didn't think of this earlier" more than once. Her genius brother was pretty much wooden and some of the other characters felt like they were overacting or just bad actors.
im very generous...
ops-5253527 February 2024
Warning: Spoilers
When offering a 3 star outta 10 for this cataclysmic story of events that scientifically are theorymaking at its most extreme, and has barely ever been seen/felt by modern day man, earth may be unpredictable but not as much as proclaimed in this story...
which also desimates itself by the choice of cast with michael pare and erica duke in the mains, doesnt give you the creeps. Its a film that depends highly and mostly on great special effects making, with loads of cgi and vfx handwork, along truthfull and reliable props and location design,and a powerfull musical score line, and here the hellbenders have missed utterly and completly.
So lets all wait till the next adressed earthquake blockbuster is on the ramp, this was really an annoying movie, at least for the grumpy old man.
which also desimates itself by the choice of cast with michael pare and erica duke in the mains, doesnt give you the creeps. Its a film that depends highly and mostly on great special effects making, with loads of cgi and vfx handwork, along truthfull and reliable props and location design,and a powerfull musical score line, and here the hellbenders have missed utterly and completly.
So lets all wait till the next adressed earthquake blockbuster is on the ramp, this was really an annoying movie, at least for the grumpy old man.
Absolutely the worst
cammic2 March 2024
Warning: Spoilers
Obviously the budget was small so they got someone's kid to do the special (and saying special is a stretch) effects using his pre-school graphics application.
Starting with opening scenes which were absolutely amateur and basic to the supposed earthquake scene in Seattle.....this was so bad. Even the actors could not rock back and forward in sync!.
We expect quite a bit better from movies in this age and this did not get anywhere near expected.
The scene on the plane with the daughter and lacked any "flying" background noise and the crew member was badly portrayed!
I could not work out it this was supposed to be bad or was supposed to be funny?
I think some things was shot on a iPhone interspersed with news or archive footage.
Absolutely the worst movie I have seen.
Starting with opening scenes which were absolutely amateur and basic to the supposed earthquake scene in Seattle.....this was so bad. Even the actors could not rock back and forward in sync!.
We expect quite a bit better from movies in this age and this did not get anywhere near expected.
The scene on the plane with the daughter and lacked any "flying" background noise and the crew member was badly portrayed!
I could not work out it this was supposed to be bad or was supposed to be funny?
I think some things was shot on a iPhone interspersed with news or archive footage.
Absolutely the worst movie I have seen.
Right into the action!
UltraNeptuneCat10 May 2024
I understand not having a phone on while in air but there's earthquakes, like either of you could die. I like just blatant earth ending stuff but I don't care for any of these people I don't know anything about them either. Everyone seems like they are reading the script for how calm they are.
"no star wars was a weapon imitative in the 80s" and the other dude just sort of shakes his head. What even are these conversations.
I am starting to think Adam Sandler would appear in this movie. They kept mentioning the knock-on effect which they never really fully explain. The reason other movies are good that have the same premise is because they have slow down parts for the story. But the parts for the story are only like 5 minutes long. Also we see the same helicopters in multiple scenes with minor movements between the clips.
"no star wars was a weapon imitative in the 80s" and the other dude just sort of shakes his head. What even are these conversations.
I am starting to think Adam Sandler would appear in this movie. They kept mentioning the knock-on effect which they never really fully explain. The reason other movies are good that have the same premise is because they have slow down parts for the story. But the parts for the story are only like 5 minutes long. Also we see the same helicopters in multiple scenes with minor movements between the clips.
Worst movie I've ever seen.
timreed-9906829 February 2024
This movie is so terrible it's actually funny. If you have a group of friends who want to drink or smoke you'll thoroughly enjoy laughing for quite a while. It's as if they intended for the movie to be terrible for comedic effect. I was surprised to see no comedy label. It might go down in history as a cult classic for worst sci-fi film ever or will be forgotten forever.
I would suggest not watching this alone. It's too painful. It's funny but it's best enjoyed with friends at a gathering, hangout, party, etc. I saw how bad it was in the first 60 seconds I continued to watch out of morbid curiosity. The acting isn't that bad but everything else is like they consulted an expert that turned out to be a crazy conspiracy theorist with an understanding of science only the church or social media could teach.
I would suggest not watching this alone. It's too painful. It's funny but it's best enjoyed with friends at a gathering, hangout, party, etc. I saw how bad it was in the first 60 seconds I continued to watch out of morbid curiosity. The acting isn't that bad but everything else is like they consulted an expert that turned out to be a crazy conspiracy theorist with an understanding of science only the church or social media could teach.
See also
Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews
