A common man with honesty and integrity can take on the system when he has truth on his side.A common man with honesty and integrity can take on the system when he has truth on his side.A common man with honesty and integrity can take on the system when he has truth on his side.
- Awards
- 12 wins & 15 nominations
Vipin Sharma
- Advocate Pramod Sharma
- (as Vipin Kumar Sharma)
- Director
- Writer
- All cast & crew
- Production, box office & more at IMDbPro
Storyline
Did you know
- TriviaTrue events and facts have been shown in the movie related to real case. The name has only been changed.
- GoofsFilm is based in 2013, but after finding Pradeeps hanging body, when Manoj takes his son to eat ice cream, there is a second generation Toyota Fortuner in the background.
Featured review
Disappointing and terrible movie..avoid watching
Terrible Cinematography, Poor Storyline
User How to write a brief review on terrible, bad cinematography and poor story line of a movie
Title: A Disappointing Journey: A Review of "Movie Title"
Introduction: "Movie Title" left me utterly disappointed with its appalling cinematography and an underwhelming storyline. From start to finish, the film failed to engage its audience, leaving a sour taste in my mouth. In this review, I will delve into the aspects that contributed to its poor execution and the overall impact it had on the viewing experience.
Cinematography: The cinematography of "Movie Title" was an absolute disaster. The camera work lacked creativity and finesse, resulting in a visually unappealing film. The shots were often poorly composed, with awkward angles and shaky movements that were distracting and disorienting. The lighting choices were equally subpar, as scenes appeared either overexposed or dimly lit, hindering the audience's ability to fully immerse themselves in the story. Overall, the cinematography failed to capture the essence of the film, contributing to its overall lackluster quality.
Storyline: The storyline of "Movie Title" was riddled with issues that ultimately made it difficult to invest in the narrative. The plot lacked coherence, with significant gaps in logic and an inconsistent pace that left viewers bewildered. Characters were poorly developed, lacking depth and relatability. Their motivations and actions often felt forced and illogical, making it challenging to empathize with their struggles or root for their successes. Additionally, the narrative failed to deliver any meaningful or thought-provoking themes, leaving the audience unfulfilled and disconnected from the story.
Execution: The execution of both the cinematography and storyline in "Movie Title" was remarkably poor. The editing was choppy and disjointed, making it challenging to follow the sequence of events. Transitions between scenes were abrupt and jarring, further contributing to the overall lack of cohesion. The dialogue felt stilted and uninspired, lacking any real emotional depth. The performances from the cast were lackluster, with wooden acting and a general lack of chemistry. These factors combined to create a film that felt disjointed and disjointed, failing to create a cohesive and engaging experience for the audience.
Conclusion: "Movie Title" is an unfortunate example of a film that falls flat due to its terrible cinematography and poor storyline. The lack of visual creativity, coupled with a weak plot and underdeveloped characters, made it a challenge to connect with the film on any meaningful level. While every film has its flaws, the combination of these shortcomings ultimately resulted in a disappointing and forgettable experience. I would not recommend "Movie Title" to anyone seeking a well-crafted and engaging cinematic journey.
User How to write a brief review on terrible, bad cinematography and poor story line of a movie
Title: A Disappointing Journey: A Review of "Movie Title"
Introduction: "Movie Title" left me utterly disappointed with its appalling cinematography and an underwhelming storyline. From start to finish, the film failed to engage its audience, leaving a sour taste in my mouth. In this review, I will delve into the aspects that contributed to its poor execution and the overall impact it had on the viewing experience.
Cinematography: The cinematography of "Movie Title" was an absolute disaster. The camera work lacked creativity and finesse, resulting in a visually unappealing film. The shots were often poorly composed, with awkward angles and shaky movements that were distracting and disorienting. The lighting choices were equally subpar, as scenes appeared either overexposed or dimly lit, hindering the audience's ability to fully immerse themselves in the story. Overall, the cinematography failed to capture the essence of the film, contributing to its overall lackluster quality.
Storyline: The storyline of "Movie Title" was riddled with issues that ultimately made it difficult to invest in the narrative. The plot lacked coherence, with significant gaps in logic and an inconsistent pace that left viewers bewildered. Characters were poorly developed, lacking depth and relatability. Their motivations and actions often felt forced and illogical, making it challenging to empathize with their struggles or root for their successes. Additionally, the narrative failed to deliver any meaningful or thought-provoking themes, leaving the audience unfulfilled and disconnected from the story.
Execution: The execution of both the cinematography and storyline in "Movie Title" was remarkably poor. The editing was choppy and disjointed, making it challenging to follow the sequence of events. Transitions between scenes were abrupt and jarring, further contributing to the overall lack of cohesion. The dialogue felt stilted and uninspired, lacking any real emotional depth. The performances from the cast were lackluster, with wooden acting and a general lack of chemistry. These factors combined to create a film that felt disjointed and disjointed, failing to create a cohesive and engaging experience for the audience.
Conclusion: "Movie Title" is an unfortunate example of a film that falls flat due to its terrible cinematography and poor storyline. The lack of visual creativity, coupled with a weak plot and underdeveloped characters, made it a challenge to connect with the film on any meaningful level. While every film has its flaws, the combination of these shortcomings ultimately resulted in a disappointing and forgettable experience. I would not recommend "Movie Title" to anyone seeking a well-crafted and engaging cinematic journey.
helpful•219
- varadarotti
- May 24, 2023
- How long is Sirf Ek Bandaa Kaafi Hai?Powered by Alexa
Details
- Release date
- Country of origin
- Official site
- Language
- Also known as
- सिर्फ एक बंदा काफ़ी है
- Production companies
- See more company credits at IMDbPro
Box office
- Gross worldwide
- $327
- Runtime2 hours 12 minutes
- Color
- Aspect ratio
- 2:39:1
Contribute to this page
Suggest an edit or add missing content