Doctor Who: Season 7, Episode 5

The Angels Take Manhattan (29 Sep. 2012)

TV Episode  -   -  Adventure | Drama | Family
Your rating:
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 -/10 X  
Ratings: 9.0/10 from 2,570 users  
Reviews: 17 user | 15 critic

The Doctor takes Amy and Rory to New York, where the Weeping Angels are waiting for them. River Song returns.



0Check in

Editors' Spotlight

IMDb at Comic-Con 2014

Follow our coverage of Comic-Con 2014, direct from San Diego July 23-27 in our Comic-Con section.

User Lists

Related lists from IMDb users

list image
a list of 35 titles
created 02 Jun 2013
a list of 42 titles
created 28 Jun 2013
list image
a list of 28 titles
created 11 months ago
list image
a list of 25 titles
created 7 months ago
list image
a list of 27 titles
created 6 months ago

Related Items

Connect with IMDb

Share this Rating

Title: The Angels Take Manhattan (29 Sep 2012)

The Angels Take Manhattan (29 Sep 2012) on IMDb 9/10

Want to share IMDb's rating on your own site? Use the HTML below.

Take The Quiz!

Test your knowledge of Doctor Who.
« Previous Episode | 88 of 124 Episodes | Next Episode »





Episode complete credited cast:
Grayle (as Mike McShane)
Ozzie Yue ...
Burnell Tucker ...


The Doctor, Amy and Rory are in New York City on a beautiful summer's day. Rory sets off to get coffee and walks into a 1930s film noir where daughter River Song is a private detective, Melody Malone. Actually, Amy and the Doctor have the whole story written down in a cheap paperback but the Doctor forbids her to read too far ahead because once they know what happens, it cannot be changed. As for Rory, he finds that the Weeping Angels are there. Several attempts to travel back in the TARDIS are unsuccessful but they manage to break through. They find that the angels have taken over New York and the only way to stop them is to create a paradox - but not everyone will survive. Written by garykmcd

Plot Summary | Add Synopsis

Parents Guide:



Release Date:

29 September 2012 (UK)  »

Company Credits

Show detailed on  »

Did You Know?


Matt Smith and Karen Gillan got very emotional filming the final graveyard scene. See more »


In the cold open, when Mr. Grayle hands Sam Garner the money for the investigation, the reverse of a one dollar bill is shown. One-dollar Federal Reserve notes did not exist until 1963, and the story takes place in the 1930s, where five dollars was the minimum denomination at the time. See more »


The Doctor: I always rip out the last page of a book. Then it doesn't have to end. I hate endings!
See more »

Crazy Credits

The Doctor Who nameplate bears an episode-appropriate design, in this case, a motif featuring the Statue Of Liberty. See more »


Blink (suite)
Written by Murray Gold
Performed by BBC National Orchestra of Wales
See more »

Frequently Asked Questions

This FAQ is empty. Add the first question.

User Reviews

Hello, I Must Be Going
29 September 2012 | by (New York City) – See all my reviews

Companions come and go in DOCTOR WHO. The only real fixed point in space and time is the Doctor. We always knew the day was coming when Amy Pond and Rory Williams would leave. I don't think anyone thought it would be so heartbreakingly sad and so exalting at the same time.

Throughout most of the history of Doctor Who, time travel has usually been a plot device to get the Doctor and his companions from one adventure to the next, like switching narrators in Boccacco's Decameron. Only rarely was it central to the story itself and then it usually was used for paradoxes.

Then Steven Moffatt wrote "The Girl in the Fireplace" for the second series of the revived show and invented the Weeping Angels for "Blink". When he took over as the show runner, we began to see time in a bifurcated fashion: as a fixed dimension in the universe and as as a sequence of events in a person's life. Oh, perhaps that was the point of the confusing welter of events in Terry Nation's "The Chase", but it was never pursued until Moffatt began to build multi-season arcs. For most people, time ran in its fixed course and Tuesday always followed Monday. For others, it consisted of a widely separated series of events that snarled into itself and somehow existed in many ways at the same moment, like Amy Pond. Sometimes it ran backwards and forwards in a manner that made little sense to the outsider, like River Song.

Moffatt has turned Doctor Who into a series of mystery stories, with the solution of the mystery being the teasing out of the timeline of the individuals from the big ball of timey-wimey stuff, with the weekly monster and occasionally saved world thrown in as a bonus. Some fans hate it. Me, I love it. For Moffatt, time is sometimes the hero, sometimes the villain, but always a character that must be dealt with. As a man in his fifties, it's something I appreciate.

For the last story of the Ponds, Moffatt and his staff have pulled out all the stops. We have Alex Kingston as River Song back to say goodbye to her parents. We have the Weeping Angels, Moffatt's scariest monsters, and we have the city of New York, with the cast in the city to do some shooting. There are some lovely shots of Central Park around Belvedere Castle and of Times Square.

It's a great episode and I'm glad that Karen Gillian and Arthur Darvill, the actors who play Amy and Rory, get to go out in such a superb piece of television. It's up to us to wish them well and hope they get more chances to play good roles. For everyone in the cast, crew and audience, it's time to move on.

40 of 62 people found this review helpful.  Was this review helpful to you?

Message Boards

Recent Posts
What is wrong with The Doctor, The Widow and The Wardrobe? doctorwhofan134
At What Time? nsirote
Who else thinks Capaldis Doctor......, dave_haydock
Discuss The Angels Take Manhattan (2012) on the IMDb message boards »

Contribute to This Page

Create a character page for: