Jobs
(2013)
|
|
| Watch Trailer 0Share... |
Jobs
(2013)
|
|
| Watch Trailer 0Share... |
| Cast overview, first billed only: | |||
| Ashton Kutcher | ... | ||
| Dermot Mulroney | ... | ||
| Josh Gad | ... | ||
| Lukas Haas | ... | ||
| Matthew Modine | ... | ||
| J.K. Simmons | ... | ||
| Lesley Ann Warren | ... | ||
| Ron Eldard | ... | ||
| Ahna O'Reilly | ... | ||
| Victor Rasuk | ... |
Bill Fernandez
|
|
| John Getz | ... |
Paul Jobs
|
|
| Kevin Dunn | ... |
Gil Amelio
|
|
| James Woods | ... | ||
| Nelson Franklin | ... |
Bill Atkinson
|
|
| Eddie Hassell | ... |
Chris Espinosa
|
|
While living with his adoptive parents, Jobs is working for 'Atari'. He then, develops a partnership with his friend Steve Wozniak when he sees that Wozniak has built a personal computer (the Apple I). They name their new company 'Apple Computer' and starts building Apple I computers. After many failed attempts by Jobs to gain venture capital, Mike Markkula invests in the company which allows them to move forward. Written by Nebzyl
Steve Jobs isn't a nice guy... he uses people like they are toilet paper... and he is a taker. It's a great set-up for a slammin' movie. Unfortunitely, this movie seems incomplete and without heart. More accurately, most of the scenes seem incomplete, disjointed and pointless. It all adds up to nothing.
Problem #1) You don't care for Jobs and you leave the theater not knowing Jobs. There are few emotional moments in the movie - except when you want to spit on him. Fire this person unnecessarily; deny that loyal employee well-earned benefit; use your wealth to destabilize the company... it all describes someone you are glad you don't know personally or professionally.
Problem #2) The movie is paced slower than my Aunt Minnie in a walker. I've seen paint dry faster.
Problem #3) The acting... maybe I should say the affectations. Kutcher over-emphasized Jobs odd gate and stance as if it meant something. But why distract us with an antalgic back, hyper-extension of the knees, increased lordosis and anterior propulsion? It distracted from the story and took me out of the movie every time.
Problem #4) The editing was horrible. Scenes would start and finish randomly - with no emotional content. Many scenes had no relationship to the structure of the movie - taking valuable time and adding little to nothing; disjointed would be too nice of a word.
Problem #5) The strange arc of the story-line ended before it began in earnest. The writing didn't explain how the apple II was able to sustain the many, many years of subsequent failures. Do corporations really build stockholders via "image", not performance? Metaphysically, I know that untalented a-holes who use, abuse and throw people away deserve to suffer. But we didn't see suffering. We see a fabulously wealthy person, whose emotional system was M.I.A, slide through life on the efforts of others.
There is no teaching moment in this movie. There is no emotional content. There are no memorable lines or moments. This isn't a movie; it feels more like revenge, cold and pointless.