|Index||6 reviews in total|
If God is our pure, all-loving creator, can he really turn his back on
sinners and allow them to suffer for eternity in hell? Where did this
vision of hell come from? Is it possible we have got hell wrong? Or are
recent challenges to the traditional view merely an attempt to avoid
This documentary involves talking to a lot of people about hell, from pastors to Westboro members, to atheists.... to Gwar. Some believe, some do not, some argue that hell cannot be eternal if it exists because that is incompatible with a loving god.
Of all the various concepts of hell -- which is right? Are any right? I think this provided a good overview of the problem, but never really got to the meat and potatoes. Are some theories better than others? Is the whole idea just not possible to sort out? I think a bit more depth would be nice...
Kevin Miller's Hellbound? comes equipped with one monstrous question
and that is, "can God and Hell coexist?" Can God really send people,
regardless if they're bad, to hell and still viewed as the almighty
being? The question is one that has often been forced onto the
sidelines, yet is beginning to come back in recent religious
Miller talks to various people with all different beliefs and backgrounds, including members of the Westboro Baptist Church (the church famous for spreading their hate-mongering "God Hates Fags" signs at military funerals), screenwriter Robert McKee, various evangelical priests, noted Christian author William Paul Young, and David Bruce, head of the Hollywood Jesus website.
We learn early on that there are three different beliefs of Hell that many people hold. The first one is the most basic, "eternal torment," meaning that there is a place called "Heaven" and a place called "Hell." If you're good, you go up, if you're bad, you go down. The second is ominously called "annihilationism," which states that the ones who have lived wholesome lives (to whatever extent of that vague statement) will go up to Heaven and be rewarded with eternal life while the ones who have sinned will be destroyed and cease to exist. The final belief is called "universalism," in which everyone is reconciled to God, sooner or later, no questions asked.
Hellbound? features lengthy, intelligent monologues by people who clearly grasp the idea of spirituality and are in touch with their faith, regardless of what it might be. Documentarian Kevin Miller's strength is that he can take the strong subject matter and juggle it objectively and without a noted bias. Considering all the documentaries that try and take a micro look at a macro issue, Miller also never shortchanges his film's concept and devotes eight-four long, insightful minutes to a debate that has long been alive and will not be solved anytime soon.
Directed by: Kevin Miller.
Hellbound? is a documentary asking pretty important questions of
religion, life and death, summed up in a basic question: Is hell real?
With these kinds of topics, too often you expect extremism, arrogant
atheism on the one hand ("Of course this stuff isn't real, you're
stupid to believe it!"), religious arrogance on the other ("You're all
going to hell, except me!"). Instead, here's a documentary that can
make an argument while considering varied viewpoints, and even a little
history (What did Old Testament Jews believe, and what does the
destruction of Jerusalem have to do with this?)
The documentary starts off giving a slight impression that it's going to argue hell is a total fiction- we visit an atheist, Robert McKee, who the filmmakers want to hear how to tell a story from, as well as the always-charming Westboro Baptist Church, so the viewer associates belief in hell with lunacy. Then, suddenly it's about how if you don't believe in hell, you're not a Christian at all. But as the film goes on, the more ideas we hear- what if hell is temporary, or a process of judgment, or just how ancient Christians literally tossed bodies into a valley? Some of the points, including that it's tremendously arrogant to think you have all the answers, and that you can dictate who goes to heaven and hell, are right on. Numerous interesting questions are visited in the process, including whether God is all-powerful, who Satan is and so on. What we have at the end is an intelligent discourse, and a fine film to see for anyone interested in faith, any faith, or what happens after we die.
There is the good and bad with this film. The bad is many people telling lies about Hell by simply telling us their opinion and how they feel and therefore deceiving people who are watching this movie. So many of the people interviewed in this documentary don't want to believe in Hell and want to convince us that Hell isn't real. But I am very thankful that Mark Driscoll was in this movie to tell us the truth about Hell. Hell is real; it is forever; and most people go there. The only hope is Jesus Christ and for us to put our trust in Him and to repent. I still found this documentary interesting and worth watching and recommend this movie but I do not want anyone to be deceived.
Hellbound is a movie that deals with the question of is there or is
there not a hell, and who goes there after death. The movie contains
interviews with quite a variety of people ranging from members of the
Westboro Baptist church who protest at military funerals (and in this
movie are shown in New York City on the day of the 10th anniversary of
9/11), a pastor of megachurch, a heavy metal rock band, to various
authors who have written about what they believe about hell.
It becomes apparent that the filmmakers believe in universalism, meaning all people will eventually go to heaven and that evil people such as Hitler, Stalin etc will have a chance to be redeemed. There are interviews with people who do not agree with this viewpoint, though I think more time is spent on the 'all dogs go to heaven' belief than on other viewpoints. I think too much film time was spent on the fringe people such as the Westboro protesters and not enough time was spent with those who do not believe in universalism.
I do think this is an important movie to see and though there were only 7 people in the theater for a 620pm showing on a Friday night (plus this was the only theater in the Chicago area that had this movie that night), I am hopeful more people will attend future showings.
Unlike Michael Moore, whose documentaries present a clearly biased and
one-sided view, Kevin Miller's documentary on the nature of hell is
nicely balanced and thought-provoking. True, it becomes clear that the
filmmaker is leaning towards a position on the subject but I'm willing
to grant him that, as his leanings towards Christian universalism run
so counter to the popular protestant understandings of hell.
As a critique, the film has a gaping hole in the shape of the catholic view on hell -- there is no mention of the doctrine of purgatory, which would have added significant weight to the discussion. Given the catholic church's position in the development of Christian doctrine, the decision to ignore that voice is disappointing.
The film is clearly meant for an audience of 'believers', but the material is well-presented and offers an opportunity for discussion amongst all people, regardless of their faith. That, I think, is the best quality for documentary films like this one -- that it can facilitate meaningful and intelligent discussion without the awkward discomfort of trying to artificially promote an agenda.
|Plot summary||Ratings||External reviews|
|Official site||Plot keywords||Main details|
|Your user reviews||Your vote history|