3.9/10
8,703
89 user 164 critic

The Canyons (2013)

Trailer
1:12 | Trailer

Watch Now

From $12.99 (SD) on Amazon Video

When Christian, an LA trust-fund kid with casual ties to Hollywood, learns of a secret affair between Tara and the lead of his film project, Ryan, he spirals out of control, and his cruel mind games escalate into an act of bloody violence.

Director:

Reviews
Popularity
3,252 ( 339)
2 wins & 2 nominations. See more awards »

Videos

Photos

Edit

Cast

Cast overview, first billed only:
...
...
...
Ryan (as Nolan Funk)
...
Gina
...
Cynthia
...
Dr. Campbell
...
Hoodie Guy
Danny Wylde ...
Reed (as Chris Zeischegg)
...
Randall
...
Jon
...
Erik (as Phil Pavel)
Lily Labeau ...
Young Hot Girl
Thomas Trussell ...
Young Hot Guy
...
David
...
Jaden
Edit

Storyline

When Christian, an LA trust-fund kid with casual ties to Hollywood, learns of a secret affair between Tara and the lead of his film project, Ryan, he spirals out of control, and his cruel mind games escalate into an act of bloody violence.

Plot Summary | Add Synopsis

Taglines:

It's not the hills.

Genres:

Drama | Thriller

Motion Picture Rating (MPAA)

Rated R for strong sexual content including graphic nudity, language throughout, a bloody crime scene and brief drug use | See all certifications »

Parents Guide:

 »
Edit

Details

Official Sites:

|

Country:

Language:

Release Date:

2 August 2013 (USA)  »

Also Known As:

Vale do Pecado  »

Box Office

Budget:

$250,000 (estimated)

Opening Weekend:

$13,351 (USA) (2 August 2013)

Gross:

$49,494 (USA) (23 August 2013)
 »

Company Credits

Show detailed on  »

Technical Specs

Runtime:

Color:

Aspect Ratio:

2.35 : 1
See  »
Edit

Did You Know?

Trivia

Funded in large part by a campaign on Kickstarter.com. See more »

Goofs

When Tara and Christian are by the pool, Tara's sunglasses are on her face whenever the camera faces her. But her sunglasses are on her head when the camera is behind her. See more »

Quotes

Ryan: Don't worry, baby. It'll be alright. It'll be okay.
See more »

Connections

Referenced in Lindsay: Part One (2014) See more »

Soundtracks

Coming Down
Written By Dee Dee
Performed By Dum Dum Girls
Courtesy Of Sub Pop Records
See more »

Frequently Asked Questions

See more (Spoiler Alert!) »

User Reviews

 
Surprisingly Un-Sexy
5 August 2013 | by (Canada) – See all my reviews

This film suffers heavily from a distinct lack of sexiness and way too much boring dialogue. And that is just the beginning of the problems. You really know a film is bad when Lindsay Lohan is the only bright light in it!

The Acting: Lindsay Lohan does quite a good job in a couple of scenes involving emotion, though she is much less effective in the (too abundant) dialogue heavy scenes. James Deen shows a few flashes of talent but mainly seems as if he is trying to emulate a method actor with no real understanding of how to actually pull it off. The other "performances" are uniformly bad to less-bad.

The Writing: One word... Awful. Boring dialogue and unbelievable story. Poor ending. I think Bret Easton Ellis is a one-trick pony. He has never managed to equal what he achieved with American Psycho.

The Directing: Same word as above... Awful. Paul Schraeder really should sink back into obscurity. This project is definitely not going to help his career. Poor choice of camera angles and poor framing abounds. He shows no sign of his earlier talents. I think he is lost in his own imagined "genius" as he tries for a gritty realism and gets ugly pretentiousness.

Camera, Lighting, etc.: Poor lighting in almost every indoor scene. It looks like it was shot on a smart phone. The music is irritating. Wardrobe... What wardrobe? It looks like the actors supplied the clothes they wanted to wear. There is no costume design or set design in evidence here.

Sexiness: Basically there is none. Lindsay Lohan looks pretty sad with her prominent beer belly, sagging breasts and 1960s style lingerie. Control-top granny panties are not lust-inducing! The sex scenes are boring and much less spicy than the hype suggested. The "orgy" was so badly filmed it and lit that it was impossible to find it sexy or even interesting. Women or those with a gay interest may find it more sexually appealing but I don't find dangling limp penises to be anything but silly looking. The entertainment media painted this as shockingly graphic but it is pretty tame compared to cable shows like True Blood if you discount the number of penises on view.

In Conclusion: Not really worth a look even if you just want to see Lindsay Lohan in the buff. There was more of her on view in Playboy and her body looked at least a bit better in the magazine. If you are looking for titillating sex scenes you would be better off with Skinemax. If you want to see a dramatic expose of Hollywood's dark underbelly look elsewhere. In fact just look elsewhere. Period.


68 of 112 people found this review helpful.  Was this review helpful to you?

Message Boards

Recent Posts
is this film actually a 4/10 or is it receieving hate for other reasons? girlongoing
I don't understand the hate. kayleewheat
LOVE THIS MOVIE! emmiilp99
The phone plot-hole terino
Lindsay's Wardrobe? terino
good story but ... tarekofsyria
Discuss The Canyons (2013) on the IMDb message boards »

Contribute to This Page

Create a character page for:
?