MOVIEmeter
SEE RANK
Up 12,835 this week

First: The Official Film of the London 2012 Olympic Games (2012)

 |  Documentary  |  30 May 2013 (USA)
5.5
Your rating:
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 -/10 X  
Ratings: 5.5/10 from 31 users  
Reviews: 2 user | 4 critic

The Official Film of the XXXth Olympic Games to be held in London, following the stories of twelve first-time Olympians from around the world.

Director:

0Check in
0Share...

IMDb Picks: April

Visit our IMDb Picks section to see our recommendations of movies and TV shows coming out in April.

User Lists

Related lists from IMDb users

a list of 144 titles
created 26 Jun 2012
 
a list of 42 titles
created 17 Sep 2013
 
a list of 17 titles
created 10 months ago
 
a list of 27 titles
created 1 month ago
 

Connect with IMDb


Share this Rating

Title: First: The Official Film of the London 2012 Olympic Games (2012)

First: The Official Film of the London 2012 Olympic Games (2012) on IMDb 5.5/10

Want to share IMDb's rating on your own site? Use the HTML below.

Take The Quiz!

Test your knowledge of First: The Official Film of the London 2012 Olympic Games.
1 win. See more awards »
Edit

Cast

Credited cast:
John Orozco ...
Himself
Heena Sidhu ...
Herself
David Rudisha ...
Himself
Majlinda Kelmendi ...
Herself
Carolyn Buchanan ...
Herself (as Caroline Buchanan)
...
Herself
Chad le Clos ...
Himself
Katie Taylor ...
Herself
Bo Qiu ...
Himself
Laura Trott ...
Herself
Queen Underwood ...
Herself
James Ellington ...
Himself
Christophe Lemaitre ...
Himself
Bruno Fratus ...
Himself
Rest of cast listed alphabetically:
Basheer Abdullah ...
Himself
Edit

Storyline

The Official Film of the XXXth Olympic Games to be held in London, following the stories of twelve first-time Olympians from around the world.

Plot Summary | Add Synopsis

Genres:

Documentary

Parents Guide:

 »
Edit

Details

Official Sites:

Country:

Language:

Release Date:

30 May 2013 (USA)  »

Also Known As:

First  »

Filming Locations:

 »

Company Credits

Show detailed on  »

Technical Specs

Runtime:

Color:

See  »

Frequently Asked Questions

This FAQ is empty. Add the first question.

User Reviews

 
a total mess
31 May 2013 | by (California) – See all my reviews

I was really excited to see this film. While it is beautifully photographed (the sound mixing is also excellent), the overall narrative is a total mess. If the production quality weren't so high, my rating would've probably been a 2 or 3/10. The main issues are the following:

1. For such great footage, it's a real shame there wasn't more attention placed on story. They never set up the stakes for each of the athletes leading up to their event. Many of them have no conflict whatsoever and them winning the gold is basically a foregone conclusion. This is often fun to watch, but it's not dramatic at all. Shockingly enough for what should be an exciting sports film, it becomes really boring at times.

2. It takes on too many characters. Focusing on 12 characters is way too much and doesn't give the viewer adequate time to get to know any of them with any real detail. They would've been far better off focusing on 3, maybe 4 people max.

3. It profiles some sports and some athletes that just aren't interesting at all. Some of the personalities are a total dud and their segments should've been cut. And as for events...I'm sorry but olympic shooting is just not exciting. Standing still and firing a gun at a static target is about as unathletic as it gets, particularly when you're trying to capture the greatest global sporting event held across a 4 year period.

4. It's dramatically overscored. Wayyy too much music attempting to stylize the film. Why not just focus on telling a story and not have random pop music editorializing each and every emotion?

5. Interview subjects are not on camera 99% of the time. Their voices are merely heard underneath images, which never lets you get to know the people or feel any emotion for them. The entire film is edited together like a music video. In fact the interviews with the cast after the film before the credits start contains some of the best stuff. It's shocking how they chose to omit this.


2 of 2 people found this review helpful.  Was this review helpful to you?

Message Boards

Contribute to This Page