Up 5,303 this week

Tears of Steel (2012)

Your rating:
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 -/10 X  
Ratings: 5.6/10 from 719 users  
Reviews: 5 user | 1 critic

He just wanted to be awesome in space.



0Check in

User Lists

Related lists from IMDb users

a list of 309 titles
created 10 Dec 2011
a list of 1304 titles
created 25 Feb 2012
a list of 89 titles
created 27 Feb 2012
a list of 26 titles
created 09 Sep 2012
a list of 47 titles
created 15 Feb 2013

Connect with IMDb

Share this Rating

Title: Tears of Steel (2012)

Tears of Steel (2012) on IMDb 5.6/10

Want to share IMDb's rating on your own site? Use the HTML below.

Take The Quiz!

Test your knowledge of Tears of Steel.




Cast overview:
Old Thom
Sergio Hasselbaink ...
Rogier Schippers ...
Vanja Rukavina ...
Denise Rebergen ...
Jody Bhe ...


He just wanted to be awesome in space.

Add Full Plot | Add Synopsis


He just wanted to be awesome in space!


Short | Sci-Fi



Official Sites:



Release Date:

26 September 2012 (UK)  »

Box Office


€300,000 (estimated)

Company Credits

Production Co:

Show detailed on  »

Technical Specs



Aspect Ratio:

2.35 : 1
See  »

Frequently Asked Questions

This FAQ is empty. Add the first question.

User Reviews

A Pity The Story Wasn't Better Developed
12 March 2014 | by (Isle Of Bute , Scotland) – See all my reviews

I was very much intrigued by the opening shot of this . A young man stands on a bridge in Amsterdam and has to tell a young woman that the relationship is over . She is angry and hurt and cries is it because her robotic arm freaks him out ? Jump forward 40 years and there seems to be a robot apocalypse due to the woman making herself entirely cybernetic and building a conquering army of robots

At least I think that's what's happened because there's not much exposition as to what has happened in the 40 year gap and it's left for the audience to make up their own mind on the details . Obviously the opening scene is pivotal and all important and ties in with the plot later on but it is slightly frustrating to fill in the gaps for yourself . There might be a train of thought that states short film making should lend itself to ambigeuty and reading between the lines but I must argue when you've got a high concept plot genre that is science fiction you must explain what is happening and why even if it's not in so many words . Instead TEARS OF STEEL concentrates on action and visuals , except I couldn't help thinking there weren't done very well and I don't think it's trying to be sophisticated self knowing parody of Hollywood TRANSFOMER type movies . I have to admit I don't like science fiction blockbusters featuring humans battling giant robots and didn't even like TERMINATOR 2 JUDGEMENT DAY finding it flabby and overblown but I guess it's something of a back handed compliment to the makers of this short that it's no worse than something directed by Michael Bay or Guillermo Del Toro

0 of 0 people found this review helpful.  Was this review helpful to you?

Message Boards

Recent Posts
Apparently there is a lesson to be learned from this ... flonks
It feels like transformers, only cheaper ackbarsmagnificentjackal
Directly copies Enslaved Odyssey to the West petrtomkevich
Discuss Tears of Steel (2012) on the IMDb message boards »

Contribute to This Page

Create a character page for: