On death row for the murder of Beulah Jolivet, Deryl Madison is interviewed, he gives his account, and experts give their opinion on the fact that he's on death row.
It's a very interesting episode, one that makes you think, the balance between the crime, and the circumstances. Should Madison be on death row, or should the fragile state of his mental health have been a contributing factor during his sentencing.
As with the last episode, there's a lot more focus on the experts (at least these ones are interesting,) and perhaps not enough time spent with Madison himself, but the case is interesting, and thought provoking enough.
The fact that this is set in Texas makes it all the more interesting, a state that is seen as being much tougher on crime than many others.
A few bits of it were quite hard to catch, so I'd say you do need to concentrate, the subtitles really do help, Deryl has quite a strong accent.
6/10.
It's a very interesting episode, one that makes you think, the balance between the crime, and the circumstances. Should Madison be on death row, or should the fragile state of his mental health have been a contributing factor during his sentencing.
As with the last episode, there's a lot more focus on the experts (at least these ones are interesting,) and perhaps not enough time spent with Madison himself, but the case is interesting, and thought provoking enough.
The fact that this is set in Texas makes it all the more interesting, a state that is seen as being much tougher on crime than many others.
A few bits of it were quite hard to catch, so I'd say you do need to concentrate, the subtitles really do help, Deryl has quite a strong accent.
6/10.
