Simplistic handling of subject casts doubt on series objectivity
The episode (#12) concerning Finland contains gross errors, misrepresents some subjects, grasps at straws at bewildering pace and, on the whole, seems tendentious, aimed at providing a biased view of the subject. It misses some very obvious points against the given view and interpretations of events, while providing a curious, single-threaded narrative that switches sides instead of providing objectivity using alternative explanations. This casts the whole series in a very suspicious light.
While the whole subject is definitely worth an objective look, I'm not sure this documentary series is up to the task.
2 of 2 people found this review helpful.
Was this review helpful to you?