Peter asks Joan to make an unspeakable sacrifice to help secure the Jaguar account, Peggy prepares to make a drastic move in response to Don's treatment, and Megan's acting career begins to create tension with her and Don.

Director:

Writers:

(created by), | 1 more credit »
Reviews

Watch Now

From $1.99 on Amazon Video

ON DISC

Videos

Photos

Edit

Cast

Episode cast overview, first billed only:
...
...
...
...
Betty Francis (credit only)
...
...
...
...
...
Sally Draper (credit only)
...
...
Henry Francis (credit only)
...
...
...
...
Edit

Storyline

Tension is rising at the firm as the date for making their pitch to Jaguar approaches. Don and most of the creative team are huddling in the conference room trying to get it right. Another complication arises when one member of the three man panel who will select the winning agency makes it clear that if they want any chance of winning, it will be necessary for Joan to spend the night with him. Joan scoffs at the idea but in the end demands a high price for her cooperation. Peggy Olson meanwhile decides the time may be right to get a job elsewhere. Freddy Rumsen encourages her and helps her get the word out. Megan meanwhile is excited at getting a call-back for a stage play but Don is only now realizing what that implies. Written by garykmcd

Plot Summary | Plot Synopsis

Genres:

Drama

Certificate:

TV-14 | See all certifications »
Edit

Details

Country:

Language:

Release Date:

27 May 2012 (USA)  »

Company Credits

Show detailed on  »

Technical Specs

Runtime:

Color:

Aspect Ratio:

1.78 : 1
See  »
Edit

Did You Know?

Trivia

Set in January 1967. See more »

Goofs

While Harry, Peggy, and Ken are on the phone with Chevalier Blanc Cologne, you can see a close up of the speaker phone that they are using. The speaker has a logo of the Bell System that was not introduced until 1969. This episode takes place in January of 1967. See more »

Quotes

Pete Campbell: [about pitching to Jaguar] I've seen the campaign and it's something I couldn't have imagined, yet exactly what I expected.
Don Draper: Thank you.
Pete Campbell: And I want you to present in the fullest confidence.
Don Draper: I think it's a winner.
Pete Campbell: Well, all I wanted to say was we've removed all other impediments. But you do know no matter what else goes on, it's the creative that's going to win this.
[smirks]
Don Draper: Close the door.
Pete Campbell: It was four to zero. You abstained in absentia. The conversation doesn't end just because you leave the room.
Don Draper:
Pete Campbell:
[...]
See more »

Connections

References The Tonight Show Starring Johnny Carson (1962) See more »

Soundtracks

You Really Got Me
(uncredited)
Music & lyrics by Ray Davies
Performed by The Kinks
See more »

Frequently Asked Questions

This FAQ is empty. Add the first question.

User Reviews

 
On Tolerance for Ambiguity
28 May 2012 | by (United States) – See all my reviews

The adroit juxtaposition of Don's presentation with Joan's aside...

How many of us were raised (taught, instructed, indoctrinated, trained) to tolerate ambiguity or unresolved conflict? If the conductors of our cult-ure promoted anything other than black and white, all or nothing, all good or all bad, all right or all wrong thinking, do you think our cult-ure(s) would survive in the contests against the similarly raised competition?

I've seen every last episode. And just when I thought that Matthew and his monumentally conscious collaborators could not outdo their previous efforts, they knock me in the head with a triple play like this.

Angry feminism is the "feminism" most of us either buy into (out of guilt?) or reject (out of hand). In the world of centerless, immoderate mental polarity most of us take for granted, it's all about "Hanoi Jane" or "hairy legged ragers" or "intellectual dominatrix's" ... and the "overweening" Helen Reddy, the "subversive" Betty Friedan, or the "castration-bent" Alanis Morissette.

Change does not go down easily with those who have been regimented so effectively that the majority of them will sit tight when the wealth accumulators elect to vacuum the pockets or slaughter the sons (and now daughters) of those they trained to make, consume and fight.

I've no idea if Matthew & Company understand all this, but it surely =looks= like they do in episodes like this. The hopeful, achievement- obsessed Cosmo Girls up against the wall, or perhaps more accurately, painted into the corners of their indoctrinated identities as objects accepting the rights of others to use them as they see fit.

The adolescent female of today loathes her mother for giving in. She can afford to. In today's world, the woman are =all= putting out. The dilemmas faced by Peggy, Megan and Joan are Just The Way It Is now.

Is our ardent willingness to sell out and be "all that we can be" abetted by better clarity and conscious resignation? Or are the Peggy's, Megan's and Joan's of today just as "snowed" by their instructors as their mothers and grandmothers were?

In 1966, most of us still believed in a "fairness" that was not yet so obviously a fairytale. It was part of the "glue" of our cult-ure then.

No; I do not expect to be widely understood. And neither, I think, does Matthew. (He knows he needs to make the characters, the plots and the scenery interesting.) But MM's niche success suggests, at least, that there are people out there who are least "fascinated" by The Way it Was (and Still Is?) and this ensemble's nuanced, perfectly articulated packaging of it.


12 of 26 people found this review helpful.  Was this review helpful to you?

Message Boards

Recent Posts
about the very ending jakholman
major question: What happened to the woman Don killed? citymanguy
I hate Jane Mias1208
Hamm In A Role doug65oh
I miss this show so much miseducation78
I love Mrs. Blankenship Jwink72
Discuss The Other Woman (2012) on the IMDb message boards »

Contribute to This Page