(2011 Video)

User Reviews

Review this title
2 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
Unnatural and heavily delivered, Chandler helps it a lot but the film doesn't do much to help her
bob the moo21 October 2014
There is more than just the film going on here and, although it shouldn't be like this, you probably get more from the film knowing the background. I came to this film after doing some data corrections to the work of the late actress Vivienne Chandler, and to check this was her work I watched this short film. I had read quite a bit about her beforehand, so I knew the nature of her death (1 year after this film) and that she had battled cancer up until the end. In this film the plot is one of hope in the face of a terminal illness, as a woman finds strength in her friend and her dreams.

To view the film without this context doesn't help anyone, because frankly it is not much good. The material is clunky and every scene is delivered in a self-conscious manner with heavy use of music over the top of everything. The script is very fragmented, so nothing flows but is rather delivered in blocks, which doesn't help the two actresses deliver either. As such it feels overly earnest but doesn't really warrant it, and in turn this robs it of the flow and natural presence it needed to have. Because of this, director and writer Tilly should be grateful for the casting of Chandler.

Primarily what Chandler brings is the knowledge that she is fighting cancer in real life – and that only a year after this film, she would be dead from it. This gives the film more than it deserves to have, and also means that Chandler's performance has that extra bit that comes retrospectively. I guess it both a joy but also difficult for her family to watch. Unfortunately she cannot lift the film as a whole, and it is limited by the writing, the heavy music, the lack of naturalism to the whole production. The real situation behind the character adds something to the film, but being honest, the rest of the short really doesn't deserve that help.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Sub-Virginia Woolf
Goingbegging6 January 2022
An Englishwoman, Vivienne, finds she is dying of cancer, and goes out to a remote French village, where a close friend, Rose, helps her through the final, mostly trivial, challenges of life. A new drug that won't work. A pain in her feet. The need for the companionship of a little cat.

"I can't say what brought me here... my dreams... a friend..." All delivered in that tragic minor key, so beloved of artistic bohemia, discouraging robust speech, hoping that misty vagueness somehow indicates genius.

Well, vagueness is the word. Where does this actually leave us? What were her dreams (apart from just living in the mountains)? Who is the friend? Is it that male figure framed against the sky? Is he an old lover, or perhaps the Redeemer making his first greeting?

If we found Vivienne more intriguing, we might delve a bit deeper into some of her dialogue - only to find it endlessly drowned-out by the music track, especially that intrusive accordion, so incompatible with delicate, gossamer thoughts. (We literally can't hear one word of her answer to Rose asking "Seriously, what are you going to do about the pills?") And what is meant by 'La Valse Triste. Vivienne Chandler' in the credits? I certainly couldn't pick out anything resembling a waltz theme.

It lends an ironic edge to the title 'Ceaseless Sound', for which there is no apparent explanation. I think we have to note that this is the work of a university production group, and sheer immaturity bulks-up big in the result. Prestigious awards have been won by 8-minute epics. But not this one.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed