Sean is a lonely high school freshman who makes a wish to have a true friend. However, he doesn't expect his wish to come true. A former U.S. president, James Garfield, comes to help him ... See full summary »
Marc S. Lawrence
Hans: A Case Study is a modern fable based on Sigmund Freud's 1909 landmark case study "Little Hans: Analysis of a Phobia in a Five Year old Boy". Hans is a hero's tale of a young boy's ... See full summary »
In the scene where Graham is reading books in the car with his parents, his father takes the book and puts it in the glove compartment. In the glove compartment are other confiscated books, and behind them a can of Spam. The Spam refers to the (in)famous "Spam" TV sketch by Monty Python's Flying Circus. See more »
Sigmund Freud's name is misspelled as "Seigmund Freud" in the opening title sequence and closing credits. See more »
I'm a big fan of the Pythons but before watching this pretty much all I knew about Graham Chapman's life was that he was an alcoholic and gay. Sadly, after watching the film, that still seems to be pretty much all there was to him.
A series of animation teams take us through Chapman's life from birth to death and with varying degrees of success, all with Chapman's narration. The visuals are mostly good and help to keep interest but anyone looking for insight will be disappointed. A self-indulgent sequence about Chapman's drinking withdrawal covers well-trodden ground and the repeated jokes about penises and ejaculation soon wear thin. OK, he was gay - we get it! The directors make the mistake of trying to be Pythonesque but nearly all the gags fall flat, while the storytelling gets lost and the timeline muddled. Chapman was a great performer and writer, but you wouldn't know it from this, which moves his art largely to 3rd place behind alcohol and being gay. A writing trip with Cleese seems happy to say Cleese did all the hard work on their projects while the sort of roles that gave Chapman the Hollywood lifestyle are brushed over.
Perhaps a better approach would have been to include archive footage and new materials, to explain things and provide context and perspective. Ultimately, this is just an unsatisfying film from some well-meaning Python fanboys.
1 of 1 people found this review helpful.
Was this review helpful to you?