Kate Hudson was attached to the project for a long time, but after the movie was stuck in development, she dropped out and Salma Hayek later got the job. See more »
When Everly's mother and daughter arrive and Everly brings out the gift for her daughter, the scene switches camera angles several times between looking directly at her mother & daughter and a side view, showing all three actresses. In scenes facing the mother & daughter, the mother's right hand is beneath the sleeve of a sweater she has draped over her. When the camera shifts, the sleeve is no longer covering her hand, but between her arm & body, leaving her hand exposed. The camera sequence shows her hand covered, then visible, covered, visible, and on the 5th cut, once again facing the mother & Everly's daughter, as the daughter walks towards the camera, the mother can be seen pulling the sleeve off of her hand and placing it between her arm and body, indicating they filmed the scene twice, once from each angle- with the head-on shots first, then spliced the two cuts together, not catching that the actress playing the mother never put her her sweater sleeve back over hand after removing it. See more »
[retrieves a phone from the toilet tank and dials]
[getting voice message]
This is Detective Robertson. Leave a message after the beep.
He knows. He knows.
[jarring the door partly open]
What's going on in there?
[dials another number]
Hello. It's Edith...
We are not home right now. Leave a message after the beep.
[...] See more »
My dad likes to ask me sometimes regarding action movies: "Is there a purpose to all this?" There IS no purpose. The whole movie is one big, fat excuse to slam a bunch of crazy action scenes at you. As an exercise in brutal violence, it succeeds. It's got style, and it's even got some genuinely funny moments of black humour to go along with it. The movie's premise is absolutely ridiculous and stupid, and laughably insane, but it plows through it with an almost completely straight face. In that respect, the movie is a deadpan masterpiece.
Anyway. Salma Hayek's acting, along with Joe Lynch's neat direction, are both too good for this type of movie. This is a modern-day exploitation film at its most blatant. This is Die Hard with Salma Hayek and the Yakuza. It's limited to one floor of an apartment building as a setting, and it's set during Christmas, and the main character is trapped in one room. Only unlike Die Hard, this movie has some truly cruel material to make you squirm in it. I mean wow.
Despite its flaws (and it has a lot of them) it was an entertaining movie. It's shallow, it's not all too smart, and for people with weak stomachs, it's pretty much unwatchable. Its low- budgetness isn't all that obvious unless you REALLY look for it, and most of its effects are refreshingly practical. It's nice to see blood squibs in action movies this day and age, instead of the regular old CGI clouds we're stuck with eighty (or ninety?) percent of the time. Salma Hayek hasn't been this good since Desperado, and that was freaking 1995.
2 of 2 people found this review helpful.
Was this review helpful to you?