MOVIEmeter
SEE RANK
Up 22,524 this week

Inside the Freemasons: The Grand Lodge Uncovered (2010)

3.6
Your rating:
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 -/10 X  
Ratings: 3.6/10 from 38 users  
Reviews: 1 user

Director:

0Check in
0Share...

User Lists

Related lists from IMDb users

a list of 42 titles created 19 Feb 2012
 
a list of 237 titles created 19 Apr 2011
 
a list of 59 titles created 17 May 2011
 

Connect with IMDb


Share this Rating

Title: Inside the Freemasons: The Grand Lodge Uncovered (2010)

Inside the Freemasons: The Grand Lodge Uncovered (2010) on IMDb 3.6/10

Want to share IMDb's rating on your own site? Use the HTML below.

Take The Quiz!

Test your knowledge of Inside the Freemasons: The Grand Lodge Uncovered.
Edit

Cast

Credited cast:
Karen Frandsen ...
Herself - Interviewer
John Hamill ...
Himself - Mason / Interviewee
Edit

Storyline

Add Full Plot | Add Synopsis

Plot Keywords:

secret society | occult

Genres:

Documentary

Edit

Details

Country:

Language:

Release Date:

29 June 2010 (USA)  »

Filming Locations:


Box Office

Budget:

£10,000 (estimated)
 »

Company Credits

Production Co:

 »
Show detailed on  »

Technical Specs

Runtime:

Color:

(NTSC Color)
See  »

Frequently Asked Questions

This FAQ is empty. Add the first question.

User Reviews

 
Very good info, appallingly done otherwise
8 August 2011 | by (Romania) – See all my reviews

Calling this a documentary or a movie is a very far fetched idea. It is just a long interview. The information you get from it is very interesting and as far as John Hamil goes he's done a great job, coming off as intelligent and providing accurate and good information about Freemasons, what they are about and how they relate to history.

The main reason for the low grade is Karen, the person taking the interview. She comes off as really stupid and totally out of place. She doesn't seem to have any idea or plan about what questions to ask, repeating the same questions at times which are generally dumb and uninspired. She also claims to be an artist but clearly has no cultural background whatsoever. It's as if they hired someone off the street, gave them a microphone and had them ask questions.

Also, the camera work, editing and sound are just appalling, most of it is filmed from tripod and you often see the camera shake as the operator picks it up to pan around.. really amateur in general.

Conclusion: Could have been a very nice interview, but the interviewer and camera work just stank. Worth watching for the info, just ignore everything else if you can.


1 of 1 people found this review helpful.  Was this review helpful to you?

Message Boards

Contribute to This Page

Create a character page for:
?