MOVIEmeter
SEE RANK
Down 722 this week

9/11: Blueprint for Truth - The Architecture of Destruction (2008)

8.5
Your rating:
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 -/10 X  
Ratings: 8.5/10 from 63 users  
Reviews: 4 user

Add a Plot

Director:

Writer:

0Check in
0Share...

User Lists

Related lists from IMDb users

list image
a list of 26 titles
created 04 Sep 2011
 
a list of 6049 titles
created 07 Nov 2011
 
a list of 19 titles
created 15 Dec 2011
 
a list of 60 titles
created 15 Jul 2012
 
list image
a list of 54 titles
created 11 months ago
 

Connect with IMDb


Share this Rating

Title: 9/11: Blueprint for Truth - The Architecture of Destruction (2008)

9/11: Blueprint for Truth - The Architecture of Destruction (2008) on IMDb 8.5/10

Want to share IMDb's rating on your own site? Use the HTML below.

Take The Quiz!

Test your knowledge of 9/11: Blueprint for Truth - The Architecture of Destruction.
Edit

Cast

Cast overview, first billed only:
Richard Gage ...
Himself
Jonathan Barnett ...
Himself - Worcester Polytechnic Institute (as Professor Jonathan Barnett)
David Chandler ...
Himself - Prof. of Physics (voice)
Craig Bartmer ...
Himself
Kevin McPadden ...
Himself (archive footage)
Bart Voorsanger ...
Himself - Architect (archive footage)
John Gross ...
Himself - Lead Engineer, NIST Report (archive footage)
Richard Riggs ...
Himself - Debris Removal Specialist (archive footage)
Ken Holden ...
Himself - New York Department of Design & Construction (archive footage)
Michael Casale ...
Himself - Project Supt., Mazzocchi Wrecking (archive footage)
Frank De Martini ...
Himself - Manager, WTC Construction & Project Management (archive footage) (as Frank A. De Martini)
Jeff King ...
Himself - Scientist, MIT (archive footage) (as Dr. Jeff King)
George Pataki ...
Himself - Governor of New York (archive footage) (as George E. Pataki)
...
Himself - Engine 7 (as Joe Casaliggi)
David Ray Griffin ...
Himself - Author: The New Pearl Harbor (archive footage) (as Dr. David Ray Griffin)
Edit

Storyline

Add Full Plot | Add Synopsis

Genres:

Documentary

Edit

Details

Country:

Language:

Release Date:

1 January 2008 (USA)  »

Company Credits

Show detailed on  »

Technical Specs

Runtime:

Color:

(NTSC Color)
See  »
Edit

Did You Know?

Quotes

[first lines]
Richard Gage: [applause] Thank You. Thank you so much. My name is Richard Gage, AIA. I've been a practicing architect for 20 years, and I'm a member of the American Institute of Architects. I became interested in the WTC-righ-rise collapses on 9/11 after hearing the startling conclusions of a reluctant 9/11-researcher, David Ray Griffin, on San Francisco Bay Area KPFA radio's 'guns + butter' in March of 2006. This has changed my life radically, and launched my own personal and professional quest ...
See more »

Frequently Asked Questions

This FAQ is empty. Add the first question.

User Reviews

 
Scientific, rational and credible debunking of the government's conspiracy theory
15 September 2011 | by (United States) – See all my reviews

In this scientific groundbreaking film, Architect Richard Gage, Founder of AE911Truth.org, makes the credible case that the WTC and Building 7 were taken down by controlled demolition, and not fire as the government alleges. He uses the scientific method to make his case, and shows step by step, analyzing the data objectively, how the controlled demolition hypothesis fits the data 10 out of 10, whereas the government's "fire collapse at free fall speed" theory is ZERO out of 10 in fitting with the data.

This is a must see for anyone wondering about the truth about 9/11 and willing to question it without harboring a psychological need to believe the government's conspiracy theory.

Here are some key points in this film that the deniers of truth and rationality can NEVER explain away or account for: - Thermite residue and iron micro-spheres have been found in the WTC dust. This is HARD SCIENTIFIC EVIDENCE of artificial explosives and chemicals used.

  • There is no way that a small chunk of the WTC could plummet through


the main portion of it, 80,000 tons of steel, like thin air, at near free fall speed. That is 100 percent impossible. Even a child knows that. It's common sense.

  • Thousands of people from all walks of life heard explosions at the


ground level of the WTC, just before the collapse. Some even heard them BEFORE the planes hit. This is well documented and there are many hours of video proving this. Even mainstream media reporters heard explosions and said it was a bomb. The simple explanation is that explosives were used or detonated, probably under the base of the WTC.

  • Never before or after 9/11, have steel high rises collapsed from


fire. Fire deforms a building gradually, and unevenly. You can't escape that. It does not demolish a skyscraper in seconds. Nor does it pulverize concrete to dust. That is a fact. You could pour kerosene all over the WTC and light it on fire, and the steel STILL wouldn't melt or even weaken. Only a deluded person totally out of touch with reality would deny that. If fire could do that, then the demolition company would be out of business and there would be no need to spend months rigging a building with explosives. Common sense. Even children know this. AE911Truth.org's qualified engineers and welders have tested fire's effect on steel, and found this to be true.

All lines of evidence say the official conspiracy theory and "fire collapse theory" are 100 percent wrong and 100 percent impossible. There's no way around it.

If you'd like to help AE911Truth.org, the producers of this film, please sign their petition and make a donation to their valiant efforts at: http://www.ae911truth.org

PS - I also strongly recommend you watch AE911Truth.org's new 2 hour film "9/11 Explosive Evidence - Experts Speak Out" in which scores of structural engineers and credible experts from many scientific fields, explain why the fire collapse theory of the WTC and Building 7 are false. Together they form an expert consensus and airtight case that is THE CLINCHER that wins this debate. You can watch it on YouTube by searching the title. I hope someone lists this new film on IMDb too.


7 of 8 people found this review helpful.  Was this review helpful to you?

Message Boards

Contribute to This Page