IMDb > "The Defenders" Nevada v. Riley (2010) > Reviews & Ratings - IMDb

Reviews & Ratings for
"The Defenders" Nevada v. Riley (2010)

« Prev | 11 of 18 Episodes | Next »

Filter: Hide Spoilers:
Index 2 reviews in total 

1 out of 1 people found the following review useful:

Episode 11 Rates ***1/2

Author: edwagreen from United States
17 December 2010

*** This review may contain spoilers ***

This episode was far better than the previous one and here is why:

We have an absorbing story of an ex-football player who constantly goes berserk and strikes out at anything near him. The guy is certainly headed for jail until Nick and Pete notice that he goes ballistic against the latter. Something is terribly amiss. I immediately guessed brain tumor and was happy that I was wrong. It seems that from the constant hitting that he took while on the field, his brain was adversely affected. Not bad for a defense and all this is confirmed by an MRI showing brain damage.

The sidebar story of Pete's father showing up and acting like a wild guy with the women was just hopeless. The show seems to suffer from these sidebar stories. They haven't really been any good and should be omitted.

Was the above review useful to you?

1 out of 2 people found the following review useful:

Sinking Fast

Author: lor_ from New York, New York
16 December 2010

I enjoyed the early episodes of this new series, thanks to the winning chemistry of the two lead actors. But writing has gone downhill in a hurry, and what started as entertaining has become obnoxious.

Key problem is the very phony attempt to make Belushi's character, under his brash & even vulgar exterior, a sort of crusader. The classic "The Defenders" series from the '60s was a model of good writing, bringing up and defending liberal & progressive causes week after week. I was a huge fan, and obviously the new (same title, different concept entirely) series couldn't be cast more differently from the memorable Marshall & Reed team. (Surprisingly, the age difference between the two actors is greater on the new show than the old one.) Belushi seems false and uncomfortable when called upon to mount a soapbox. For my money, the comic/actor has aged into an altogether different personality -I would like to see him do a Jackie Gleason TV turn, perhaps bringing back Gleason's classic characters like Reginald van Gleason III.

This particular episode had an absurdly handled up-to-the-minute cause: the permanent damage suffered by the players in pro football. Of course we sympathize with these guys, but the writing was preposterous and the way the segment developed -showing that the guy was ultra-dangerous and could even turn on (& maim if allowed) his counselor played by Jerry O'Connell made no sense at all. This is a case where I found the prosecutor's arguments utterly convincing, and the lame gimmickry of Belushi & O'Connell a joke.

The obligatory subplot concerned the introduction of Jerry's ne'er-do-well dad, played under protest (it seemed) by James Brolin. The current prominence of Brolin's real son, Josh, was an elephant-in-the-room distraction making it difficult to buy Jerry as his son in TV land, but the character was poorly drawn and could very well be a one-shot. A Brolin/Belushi scene involving latter's wedding ring was so stupidly scripted and obviously played that I couldn't believe they not only didn't do it over again, but that it was left in the finished episode. It was among the worst scenes I've seen on TV this year, and that includes several horrendous early-in-Season 8 episodes of "24" involving Katee Sackhoff & her boyfriend which will go down in TV infamy.

Producers and writers of "The Defenders" had better pull their socks up in a hurry and get the show back on track, or it's plug-pulling time. And time to get Belushi as The Great One into development.

Was the above review useful to you?

Add another review

Related Links

Ratings Main details Your user reviews
Your vote history