MOVIEmeter
SEE RANK
Up 2,194 this week

Shut Up Little Man! An Audio Misadventure (2011)

6.4
Your rating:
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 -/10 X  
Ratings: 6.4/10 from 546 users   Metascore: 57/100
Reviews: 11 user | 29 critic | 14 from Metacritic.com

When two friends tape-recorded the fights of their violently noisy neighbors, they accidentally created one of the world's first 'viral' pop-culture sensations.

Director:

Writer:

Watch Trailer
0Check in
0Share...

User Lists

Related lists from IMDb users

a list of 600 titles created 8 months ago
 
a list of 222 titles created 11 months ago
 
a list of 6 titles created 7 months ago
 
a list of 63 titles created 9 months ago
 
a list of 46 titles created 13 Dec 2011
 

Connect with IMDb


Share this Rating

Title: Shut Up Little Man! An Audio Misadventure (2011)

Shut Up Little Man! An Audio Misadventure (2011) on IMDb 6.4/10

Want to share IMDb's rating on your own site? Use the HTML below.

Take The Quiz!

Test your knowledge of Shut Up Little Man! An Audio Misadventure.
1 win & 3 nominations. See more awards »

Videos

Photos

Edit

Cast

Credited cast:
Ivan Brunetti ...
Himself
...
Himself
Mitch Deprey ...
Mitchell D
...
Pete
...
Ray
...
Himself
...
Himself
...
Himself
Edit

Storyline

When two friends tape-recorded the fights of their violently noisy neighbors, they accidentally created one of the world's first 'viral' pop-culture sensations.

Add Full Plot | Add Synopsis


Parents Guide:

 »
Edit

Details

Official Sites:

Country:

Language:

Release Date:

25 August 2011 (USA)  »

Also Known As:

Shut Up Little Man!  »

Box Office

Opening Weekend:

$4,117 (USA) (30 September 2011)

Gross:

$19,654 (USA) (30 September 2011)
 »

Company Credits

Show detailed on  »

Technical Specs

Runtime:

Color:

See  »
Edit

Did You Know?

Trivia

First feature to be made and released from the South Australian Film Corporation's FilmLab initiative. See more »

Connections

References The Odd Couple (1968) See more »

Frequently Asked Questions

This FAQ is empty. Add the first question.

User Reviews

 
Ultimately, A Rationalization
31 March 2012 | by (United States) – See all my reviews

In the end, this movie felt like an excuse to milk the tapes for a little more fame and/or money.

The first 2/3rds nicely chronicle how the whole phenomenon took place. And it truly is fascinating. You get a sense of how strange, serendipitous and organic it must have been to have a personal project turn into a meme.

But the key word is "organic". Other people drove the Pete and Ray story. The partners, correctly, said "go ahead" since, in effect, it wasn't really theirs to control.

It's when they take control that movie inadvertently reveals that, rather than a sweet, hapless pair that fell into something, they've staked their identities on this one thing and they've become kind of self-important assholes.

When Eddie Lee made proclamations about "art" my first thought was - "Really? What other art have you created? Because an artist normally creates more than one piece of art and all you did was tape some guys screaming at each other. Other people picked it up and turned it into something. Duping tapes and giving them to people...well...that's not really art." After that, the pair goes on a quest to do the one thing that art should never do - explain itself. Tracking down Ray, the roommate, felt like a stunt. It was a fishing trip to solve the riddle of whether Pete and Ray were lovers. That's dull and pointless.

Art, imho, allows people to project themselves into and onto what they see. These two, Eddie in particular, seem to want to prove something that doesn't need to be proved. Wrapping up the film with the Pete and Ray dancing sucks everything that's interesting about the relationship out of it.


1 of 1 people found this review helpful.  Was this review helpful to you?

Message Boards

Recent Posts
Was it just me or did anyone feel really sorry for Tony? mcrae_k
Creepy mdbrown-3
Will the real Slim Shady please stand up McEwansExported

Contribute to This Page

Create a character page for:
?