unfortunately this episode displays obsolete divorce nomenclature as a significant plot point. in a California divorce there is no longer a plaintiff and a defendant. there is a petitioner and a respondent. thinking these yokels would be personally if not intimately familiar with that. it makes for good copy but is inaccurate and antiquated. you may ask why i keep belaboring this point. well it is because of some absurd 10 line review minimum. the terminology in divorce actions was changed just to avoid the sort of prejudicial perceptions and comments that are used as a device in this episode. cheap reach into cold history is a poor method to contrive a plot device.
2 of 5 people found this review helpful.
Was this review helpful to you?