Chasing Madoff (2010) Poster

User Reviews

Add a Review
19 Reviews
Sort by:
Could have been a LOT better
whidbeydanielg22 March 2017
The basic story was ripe for an excellent documentary. It was about how a small group of people tried warning others about Madoff. They failed, but not for lack of trying, and good for them for trying.

However, the documentary itself is far too dramatic. After awhile it was tiring to hear the small group tout itself as being extraordinarily brave. The main guy who stuck with it ended up looking as disturbed as Madoff--living in a paranoid fantasy world where his family was in constant danger.

It runs about an hour and a half. It would have been a very good 50-minute documentary. But it drags on and on, often not getting anywhere.

Too bad. It had a real story to tell.

Also missing is any investigative reporting, after the fact, about why the people who were alerted (looking at you SEC, Wall Street Journal) didn't act? We still don't know why from this documentary.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? | Report this
To help you understand....
alcapewell10 December 2016
Read works of Noam Chomsky, Howard Zinn and Gore Vidal. Then, if you comprehend, you will understand the quality and appropriateness of this documentary. I live near Boston, and therefore understand the culture Harry Markopolos grew up under. Why some citizens get it, and some don't is exactly the problem with education in the US. Study linguistics. Read or listen to the book Manufacturing Consent for a good education on what controls your thinking. Ask why did the SEC not act upon this? The specialized class has us all under a tractor beam - if you chose to do nothing. This is not new information in any way. You just may have missed it when it was first published. Thank you!
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? | Report this
Hokey & Over Stuffed Fluff…But the Madoff Message Materializes
LeonLouisRicci25 April 2016
Based on the Book by Harry Markopolos "No One Would Listen: A True Financial Thriller", the Story of an Intense Investigation of Bernie Madoff trying to find out if Fraud was being Perpetrated on the Public by Madoff in a "Ponzi Scheme" or was it all some kind of Super-Genius at Work.

The Book could and should have been Titled…"No One Cared"...because They did Listen but more Importantly didn't care. Probably because Someone, if not Everyone was either told "Not to Care" or because Someone and more probably Everyone was...wait for it...MAKING MONEY.

The Security Exchange Commission (SEC) Higher Ups, and, as We are told, Madoff created an Octopus Monster with Tentacles reaching all over the World and its reach was not only Wide but High, sometimes Sliming its way to the Top of the Global Pyramid.

No Wonder "No One Would Listen", or more Accurately No One Cared. Even Most if Not Some of the Madoff Investors, especially those involved in Finance, knew for a Probability if Not a Certainty that something wasn't "Right/Legal". But the Gravy Boat was Rolling so why Rock it.

The Documentary is a High-Style entry in the many Expanded News Stories and Examinations done since Bernie Madoff turned Himself in (to avoid assassination). In this one the Focus is On Markopolos and Associates reliving "Their" Story. It's Glossy and includes Glitzy Dramatizations and Over the Top Archival Footage to Enhance the Entertainment Value.

Those that want "Just the Facts, thank You Mam", might Find this a bit too Self-Conscious and at times Silly. There are other Products out there that are Straight Documentaries. This one is Far From Straight. It makes its Point with Paraded Out Footage from Gangster Newsreels and even Movies.

Maybe too Fluffy for Some, but this Documentary is made for the Masses and tries to the Extreme to be "A Financial Thriller". It somewhat Succeeds, but is not going to Please Everyone like Madoff Did...Until He Didn't.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? | Report this
Chasing Fame
Vlad_the_Reviewer23 April 2014
Warning: Spoilers
Markopolis was a hero in my book for a brief moment. That ended after I saw multiple interviews with him and this documentary. This documentary is basically a Markopolis worship movie. Throughout we are told how big of a hero he is, that he needs to fear for his and his family safety, that he has a gun and how special he is in general. It's tiring beyond imaginable borders. Frankly, Markopolis' behaviour looks buffoon-ish. He never was in any danger. And he did not chase Madoff because he has a good heart.

It all started because Markopolis was chasing for Madoff's secret because Madoff stole much of the customers from Markopolis' employer. His employer asked if he could find out how Madoff did it.

The victims were mostly of Jewish heritage, much to the dismay of the Jewish community as it gave them a bad name for being greedy and Madoff being a Jew himself offcourse. By now about 80% of the funds have been retrieved and given back to the victims.

Like mentioned before, this documentary is mostly about Markopolis' supposed greatness. We won't learn much about the ins and outs of how things went down. The documentary should have told in what ways the governmental institutions failed. Yet this kind of information is kept to a minimum and at a very low level. There are much better documentaries out there.

I saw an interview where Markopolis claimed that only Wall Street papers were negative about this movie, as it supposedly tried to make Wall Street look bad. But having seen this documentary myself, I now must side with those papers in this very instance.
5 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? | Report this
Chaotic truth
smits5917 April 2014
The story of Bernie Madoff is well known; the biggest Ponzie-scheme ever! Less well known is how Madoff was de-cloaked. Chasing Madoff tells this story, but not in a very well executed way. The speed of the movie is more like a MTV-clip than a documentary. And I found this distracting. Also quit a lot of the time the movie constitutes of people telling how good they themselves were in catching Madoff. With all due respect for the people who brought Madoff to justice; I would have enjoyed it much more if the story was told at a slower pace and if at had been a story about the hunters. All The Presidents Men is an great example what could have been....
2 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? | Report this
Subject is very interesting, subjects are relevant, direction and editing are atrocious
eurograd10 March 2014
This documentary explores very interesting aspects of what went on behind the curtains while the massive Bernie Madoff's scheme developed, expanded and ultimately collapsed.

However, the documentary wastes the potential by using a very weak and wacky personal storyline anchor, which becomes repetitive and ultimately annoying after one of the main subjects starts putting out his paranoia for the n-th time.

The end result is a clumsy piece that bumps from a few high moment between a repetitive cycle of self-pity, delusion and confused thoughts of a man that slide into it after not seeing any results from his push to expose a major fraud in the making.
8 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? | Report this
What a disappointment
Eric (eric-1268)28 July 2013
Warning: Spoilers
Well, what a huge disappointment that was. "A look at how one investigator spent ten years trying to expose Bernie Madoff's massive Ponzi scheme."

Too bad this one investor, Harry Markopolos, turns out to be one of the most uninteresting people alive. I was looking forward to get detailed information on Madoff, but unfortunately I got to see Markopolos parents, school, church, his extreme paranoia about getting killed and loads of other information I didn't care about.

The information in this documentary could have been cut to +/- 30 minutes without all of the useless stuff. It's a shame, because this documentary could have been really great if it would provide more information about Madoff himself.
6 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? | Report this
Searing Indictment of SEC, Federal Gov't, & Wall Street
Larry Silverstein11 March 2013
Warning: Spoilers
This documentary, written and directed by Jeff Prosserman, is an absolutely scathing indictment of the SEC, our Federal Gov't, and Wall Street. I remember when the Madoff fraud came to light, amidst the world financial crisis, seeing Harry Markopolos testifying before Congress, and giving other interviews. I was incredulous at first, that his man had tipped off the SEC about Madoff many years before and that no action was taken. However, as the truth and the facts have emerged, I now believe every last scintilla of what he said.

How is this possible? The SEC, whose primary role is to investigate fraud in the financial industry and make sure the players in the financial world are playing by the rules, did nothing to expose a multi-billion dollar fraud. They couldn't even make a few phone calls, as Markopolos states, which would have easily exposed that their alleged trades were never done.

You see in the film, several members of Congress, grilling present and former SEC execs and auditors, and asking the same question. None of them had any answers. Yet, now years later there have been very few arrests and indictments not only regarding the Madoff case but for any of the fraudsters involved in the world banking crisis. So, one may ask have we really learned our lesson? The documentary is kind of a strange one because it can really be melodramatic as Markopolos recounts all the events that occurred regarding Madoff. He may even seem a little paranoid at times, as he worries about his, and his family's safety, as a prime whistleblower. My personal opinion is that he had reason to worry, as strange beatings, threats, and deaths have occurred to some who put themselves out there like that.

To me, in summary, this is a scary piece of film, which highlights how embedded the elite are in running our financial systems. Is it any wonder that the Occupy Wall Street messages caught on like wildfire for awhile. The 1% almost always run the show at the expense of the rest of us 99%er's
8 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? | Report this
love it or hate it?
Maggie98720 January 2013
There seems to be a lot of polarity about this film. People seem to either love it or hate it. I don't get this. People who make investments are relatively well off. You can't invest with Bernie Madoff in an IRA or a 401(k), so we are talking about people that have money to invest beyond an IRA or a 401(k). We are talking about rich people. People with millions and millions of dollars that they don't know what to do with. These people need to be PROTECTED from the actions of the likes of Bernie Madoff. That's right. Rich people need -the government- to protect them from the being ripped off. Yes, even liberals, or people that you think are liberals, can see that rich people need to be treated fairly.
3 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? | Report this
The schemer
jotix10010 October 2012
Warning: Spoilers
Harry Markopolos, the man at the center of this documentary, had no clue into what he was about to embark, when his friend, Frank Casey, asked him to check the numbers in a firm that was the 'star' of the investment world. Mr. Casey's intention was to be able to comprehend the success of a powerful man in New York, one Bernard Madoff. It only took Harry five minutes to realize he was looking at the largest fraud perpetrated in the financial annals of the world.

The documentary "Chasing Madoff"', conceived by its director, Jeff Prosserman, and based on the book written by Mr. Markopolos, while trying to clarify the way Mr. Madoff was able to fool everyone, is a dull piece of movie-making. The style the director uses does not add anything to the story that has been told and retold after the scandal broke in 2008. Mr. Markopolos and the other principals keep repeating themselves while the main villain of the story, Bernard Madoff is only a passing thought.

Harry Markopolos had reasons to believe his life would be in danger. He became paranoid, expecting his death, or the harming to his family. His reports to the SEC went directly to the waste basket, so he should not have worried unnecessarily. The best thing in the documentary is the appearance of Congressman Gary Ackerman questioning the big shots of the SEC, the people who should have detected the fraud and sat idly by.
9 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? | Report this
Incredible, Incredible, INCREDIBLE!
stellarbiz30 September 2012
As massive as the scheme was, so massive is the greatness of this documentary! Anyone who wondered about what happened will be informed, educated, amazed, and mind-blown! The saddest part was near the end when Markopolos and the other whistle blowers realized that the scheme hurt so many "common" people, not just the big guys. When you analyze things, you realize that the world economy is based on TRUST... in each other in our personal transactions, in businesses, institutions, and government and when that trust is to VILELY violated, the entire system suffers. Rebuilding that trust in the aftermath will take many careful years. But it is both ironic and somewhat self-satisfying to know that ultimately the scheme was blown by the pressures of the market itself. Markopolos and all of us must stand firm in the faith of the FREE AND OPEN marketplace to weed out the evil and corrupt. This documentary is a MUST SEE!
9 out of 16 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? | Report this
The cure for simplistic ideology.
raypaquin14 August 2012
Read the other reviews. There, you will find two schools of thought; those who rate this documentary ***very*** highly and those who rate is ***very*** poorly. What's going on ? This is, I believe, a microcosm of the United States today where simplistic ideology rules Washington. On one hand, you will find those who argue that more regulation is needed and, on the other hand, those who argue that less regulation is the cure because the bureaucrats in Washington are unable to regulate competently. The facts are that if your local firemen are incompetent, the solution is NOT to eliminate fire-fighters, as some right-wingers argue, but to insure that they are competent. The solution is also NOT to increase the number of firemen, as some left-wingers argue. Essentially, this documentary argues not from the viewpoint of Bernie Madoff's evil, but from the viewpoint of the incompetence of Washington bureaucrats. THAT is the truth.
15 out of 21 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? | Report this
Huge waste of time. Spoiler alerts you need to read.
WillVenture4 June 2012
Warning: Spoilers
I think Madoff is terrible and did a terrible thing, but this documentary is just horrible. This documentary is NOT about chasing Madoff; it is 95% Markopolos talking about how he feared for his life, always carried fire arms, checked under his minivan for bombs, while he simultaneously tried to make money replicating Madoff's (fake) investment strategy and held meetings where he tried to steal clients away from Madoff using similar (apparently legitimate) investment strategies. Most of the other 5% is comprised of flash-cuts to dead gangsters, funeral processions, and guns - in a melodramatic yet unbelievable ploy to convince us that his life was at risk (which apparently was all in Markopolis's head and never shown to be even close to true). This doc is totally over-the-top and makes Markopolos look like a paranoid loser who really really really wants people to think he is a bad-ass former soldier and David to Madoff's Goliath - neither of which are true (other than he was in the Army reserves). He comes across as a man on a mission to bring down Madoff not for the benefit of society or Madoff's victims, but to gain notoriety, fame, and hopefully fortune. He states that he was scared for his life and for his family, yet he kept making babies during his entire crusade. Would someone who was really scared for his family seriously keep creating new members to have to protect?? This doc is the equivalent of a third-rate desk jockey during the Iraq War telling everyone five years after its over that he was Rambo and lead a small band of special forces soldiers that brought down Sadam with no help from others. I thought I was going to watch a doc about Madoff's fall from grace; instead I watched 1.5 hours of a paranoid, melodramatic, hypocritical, armchair quarterback trying to convince the world how awesome he is. What a waste of time.
10 out of 21 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? | Report this
Amateur Hour
Jane Flagery4 May 2012
Absolute debauchery with a totally dated perspective. One of the biggest scandals that dictated part of the zeitgeist of the early 2000's and the director saw it through an amateur 1990's lens. Corny, overdone and trying way too hard - a 16 year old with an iphone could've made a better film. Jeff Prosserman's choices in everything from the cliché camera angles, over-dramatized music composition, corny stock footage (obviously used to fill in missing holes) are clear indicators that yet again, we have another overgrown kid playing with daddy's money. I can only imagine the grueling process the EP's & crew had to bear to get this thing made. It's amazing how these movies get made without anybody saying, "Wait, really? We're putting this out there??" and how much money goes down the drain while doing so. Mainly though, I wish Prosserman could give me my wasted 90 minutes back.
15 out of 32 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? | Report this
The most interesting telling of this story yet
Alan Winter29 April 2012
I don't understand the low marks for this film. It's a lively, fascinating telling of the Madoff tale, or rather, the two Madoff tales -- one about what he did and how he got caught, the other about how the people he did it to tried to protect him.

It's refreshing to see everyday people working in finance, and even more impressive to see them exercising values like sacrifice, courage, and the rule of law. Maybe the film is 10 minutes too long, but that's a small price to pay for this story.

If you're looking for an action film, rent 'Let the Bullets Fly.' If you're looking for an entertaining overview of the largest financial fraud in history, and its relevance for the rest of us, this is your documentary.
18 out of 23 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? | Report this
Tedious and annoying
Jason VanMason15 April 2012
There have been many documentary shows about Madoff. It's a fascinating and horrifying story. But this example resembles a low budget episode of a "crooks and grifters" TV reality show. Obviously, video of Madoffs early career is rare. But the producers fill the void with stock shots, clips from old time movies and inserts that are clearly meant to provide something to watch as the narrator drones on. And to keep things interesting they rely on every cinematic bromide that their computer can manage: inserts with the edges out of focus, sepia toned clips to simulate "vintage" material and flicker-frame montages that repeat the same pointless visuals over and over and over. Its a 40 minute TV show inflated to feature length. Frontline, BBC and others have covered this material better. And the video is well laced with sobbing investors, folks rich enough to interest Madoff with their millions, yet foolish and careless enough to have blindly put all their nest eggs in the same basket. They claim over and over that they have "lost everything" when it is well known that the investors did get a substantial portion of their money back. The Frontline Madoff Affair is a much better watch.
14 out of 30 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? | Report this
Terrible disappointment
richmondhill7630 September 2011
It's a shame that this doc doesn't work because the subject matter of this movie is extremely timely, important and interesting. But, ultimately, the tone of this film is so uneven and the talking heads become so redundant that it becomes unbearable to watch by the end. It's basically two hours of people saying "NOBODY LISTENED" over and over and over again.

It doesn't help that the protagonist comes off as an absolute loon, and his ongoing paranoia seems ridiculous. Maybe that's not the filmmakers' fault. But if that isn't their fault, they are to blame for sticking a maudlin, "this guy is a true hero" bit at the end that is laughable to the audience after hearing his paranoid gibberish for the previous half an hour.
15 out of 39 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? | Report this
He Was Right – No One Would Listen
Chris_Pandolfi27 August 2011
Warning: Spoilers
"Chasing Madoff" is a documentary that plays like a tightly wound political thriller. There's no action or major special effects, which is fine because they're not necessary – the facts alone are liable to get your heart pounding in sheer suspense. It presents to us the story of former securities industry executive Harry Markopolos, who, along with a team of trusted investigators, would embark on a ten-year odyssey to expose Bernie Madoff's Ponzi scheme, the largest act of financial fraud in history. As he risked everything following a trail of complicit white-collar henchmen, he found himself at odds with the press, who would mysteriously undermine his efforts to tell the public the truth, and with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), who failed to act despite being repeatedly tipped off. He would eventually go on to author the book "No One Would Listen: A True Financial Thriller."

It began back in 1999, when Markopolos still worked for Rampart Investment Management. One of his company's trading partners was working with Madoff, a hedge fund manager who could consistently deliver net returns of one-to-two percent a month. Hoping to get the trading partner to diversify away from Madoff, Markopolos was asked to design a product very similar his split-strike conversion. But within five minutes of looking at Madoff's revenue stream, Markopolos knew something was drastically wrong; the chart showed a stream that continued to rise at an almost perfect forty-five-degree angle, which would be impossible given how badly Madoff's strategy was structured on paper. Markopolos also knew that, even in the best of conditions, markets are always too volatile to allow for such returns. There were only two possible explanations, neither of which was legal: Either Madoff was front running, or he was the mastermind of a Ponzi scheme.

Several attempts at deconstructing and replicating Madoff's strategy, made possible through information on his trades in stocks and options, proved that his returns could not be simulated. At this point, Markopolos and several colleagues at Rampart took it upon themselves to investigate Madoff. A formal complaint was filed with the SEC, but they took no action whatsoever. After travelling to Europe, where he discovered that fourteen funds were invested with Madoff, Markopolos had gathered enough conclusive data to draft a twenty-one-page memo – "The World's Largest Hedge Fund is a Fraud" – and send it to the SEC. This was in November of 2005, at which point he was consumed by the need to bring Madoff down. His efforts proved threatening to his own safety; many of the funds invested with Madoff were operated offshore, which could only mean ties to the Russian Mafia and drug cartels from Latin America.

At what point is an investigation no longer worth the risk? Writer/producer/director Jeff Prosserman examines Markopolos just as closely as he does the Madoff scandal. We see a very humble military man who has dedicated seventeen years of his life to part-time service in the Maryland Army National Guard and Army Reserve. We see a devoted husband and father. Most importantly, we see a financial expert whose almost obsessive need to blow the whistle on Madoff lead to paranoia. Highly effective dramatic reenactments, starring Markopolos and his family, show the lengths he went to ensure not just his safety, but also the safety of his family. He would check every inch of his car each morning to make sure there were no explosive devices. He became a sniper. He instructed his wife on what to do should anyone ever break into the house, namely stand at the top of the stairs with a gun and keep firing until all the bullets ran out. While walking in the woods, he taught his sons to avoid stepping on twigs; if anyone wanted to hurt them, the snapping noises would give their positions away.

Intertwined with the Madoff case are brief interviews with a few of Madoff's victims, who lost absolutely everything they had. They're not identified by their names, but rather by their case numbers. This was, I believe, an intentional move on Prosserman's part; despite the impersonal labels, which reflect how someone like Madoff would view them, reasonable, compassionate audiences will see them as damaged human beings. Their heartbreaking stories of financial ruin are second only to the tragedy of Thierry de la Villehuchet, a French businessman who, because of his involvement with Madoff, committed suicide in 2008. If you think about, it was actually a rather noble act on his part. When you damage something beyond repair, even inadvertently, the decent thing to do is take responsibility for your actions.

The true villain of this story is the SEC, which missed numerous red flags and ignored all of Markopolos' early tips. Key figures of the organization – most notably Linda Thomsen, its top enforcement official – were not fired from their positions. Instead, they were allowed to resign. As for Madoff, yes, he was ultimately arrested and sentenced to 150 years in prison. But for Markopolos, it's a bittersweet victory. He believes Madoff was caught not because of actual investigative work, but simply because he could no longer carry on under the weight of his own lies. In effect, he gave himself up and jail was the only option he had left. He also believes that Madoff personally kept less than one percent of the $65 million he stole, and that he'll be cheated out of whatever remains by money launderers. "Madoff will wind up in a special prison designed as much to keep the crook's victims out as Madoff in," he said in a "Boston Herald" interview. "He's a guy who can't afford not to be in prison." So you tell me: If by being in prison he's under the protection of the American government, has justice really been served?

-- Chris Pandolfi (
24 out of 33 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? | Report this
Quite possibly the worst....
Joan Wringle26 August 2011
Never have I seen a film misdirected so well. Director Jeff Prosserman's comedy staring buffoon Harry Markopolos draws influence from Tommy Wiseau's THE ROOM. Why was Prosserman's vision not assessed by functioning adults? This film is indicative of everything wrong in documentary filmmaking today. Personally I was sad to have witnessed such a cinematic holocaust. Don't waste your time! Prosserman clearly has no idea what he's doing. If you look at Prosserman's previous work you'll find similar reviews. Emblematic of Canadian cinema, Chasing Madoff fails to meet the sufficient requirements to entertain an audience. If you're into watching films where the director has no clue where he is, what's going on or what he's doing, this film is right up your alley.
20 out of 62 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? | Report this

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews