|Page 3 of 19:||            |
|Index||185 reviews in total|
I was actually embarrassed for the headline actors, Justin Timberlake and Mila Kunis. The material was not good nor were the jokes. Justin Timberlake was bad enough to begin, as usual. Mila Kunis is normally better than this. I guess she was playing down to her material and co-star. Either way the acting was horrible as was the plot and the direction. A negative trifecta. If there were any redeeming factors to the film it was the supporting actors. All of which I felt did an excellent job with the material they had to work. Patricia Clarkson, Woody Harrelson, Richard Jenkins and even Jenna Elfman, respectively. The film was predictable which is OK in this genre. Just a sloppy project in every facet. Save your time and bypass this one.
Friends with Benefits seems like it might be a satire of Nora Ehpron's
feel good films,or Neil Simon's one dimensional types with just TV
cracks as substitutes for any kind of genuine dialogue. Not the case
here. This film makes Ephron's screenplays and directed films, along
with N. Simon's stuff, look like classics. Friends with Benefits has no
acting in it, except for Patricia Clarkson, and she is debased as one
of those old women- mothers who swear and screw around with men etc.
There isn't one line that is funny,there is not a scene between Timberlake and Kunis that has any chemistry to it. He is always seen as potentially gay, and Woody Harrelson's gay character keeps us wondering, if anyone would care to wonder.
Timberlake plays it all as sort of gay and sort of straight, but comes up neuter. I think the reason why there are so many nude shots of him is because you never take his gender seriously, like one of the dwarfs in Snow White, you never fear for Snow White's sexual safety; the dwarfs have nothing that would cause fear. So it is with Timberlake. Even when there is sex between Kunis and Timberlake, it looks like wrestling at summer camp.
The Altzheimer scenes are appalling, along with the gay male model scenes that are deeply homophobic.
This film needed a script, director, producer, and stars, not non-actors, who stomp around the set with no sense of mimesis, mimicking at all.
Avoid this, and watch "The Nanny."
My motivation for see this was that I thought 'No Strings Attached' was
hilarious and I like Milla Kunis. The previews for this film looked
like it would be funny, and though I don't really care for Justin as an
actor, I like him on 'SNL,' so, I thought he would at least be funny.
This seemed to me like it was a rushed project. I got the feeling the
whole time that this was written by some decent writers in the 2 nights
and filmed in 2 weeks. Everything felt rushed, predictable and cliché.
Maybe a better actor could have pulled Justin's lines off better,
giving them some punch...but instead, whenever he and Milla and long
diatribe's of banter, I felt like I was watching an acting scene in a
class, rather than a movie. It also felt like maybe they had as much
time to rehearse the scenes as a cold reading. The only good thing
about the movie was Woody Harrelson. He was great. Milla's mom was
good..., some of the lines were good, but too rushed through to really
come across as good or leave any weight, and Milla and Justin had good
chemistry. The only thing believable about this film was that they
would make good friends. A good couple, is questionable, but they at
least seemed to be having fun together. The movie was also extremely
formula with no twists or surprises. I didn't see the flash mob coming,
at the end, but, really, who cares. I would not call that a good or
emotional scene. It seemed more like this went on in a producer
meeting. "Flash mobs are big right now. We should throw one in there at
least a couple times. The audience loves it when the actors do a group
singing number in a film, and flash mobs are the next big thing!"
EHHHHHH!!!!! Wrong. There was one, of sorts, in 'Enchanted,' but it
worked only because it was a musical and was more of a Broadway number
than a flash mob. I didn't care about anyone in this film. And how can
you when it's paint-by-the-numbers formula without any real depth
whatsoever? Everything in this film was a gimmick to make you "feel"
something, but it was so all so transparent and spoon fed that it
didn't carry any weight.
Justin should stick to singing. He's not a good actor. Being a good sketch actor on 'SNL' does not mean you can read lines. The only reason he was halfway OK, but I wouldn't go as far as good, in "The Social Network' was because his part was small and he wasn't really acting, he just seemed to be reading lines and being himself. Not to mention, he's got a nice body but kind of Cro-Magnon looking. Without singing and dancing I don't really get his appeal...unless, of course, when he's Photoshopped. And him as an action star is even more ridiculous. What happened to the days of guys like Keanau Reeves? I mean, Jeremy Renner, Justin Timberlake, Adrian Brody? Seriously? None of these guys look like they could even take a serious punch, nor do they look lithe and stealth enough to avoid one. Though, I'm getting off track of the romantic comedy massacre, of this film.
It was on every level bad, other than Woody Harrleson, and completely unbelievable, on every level. The fact that Justin, or a 26-yr-old, is some high-paid sought after art director is ridiculous. They might as well have said he was a wealthy astronaut, which would have been just as believable. Topher Grace could pull off the young, over-achieving marketing director in that Dennis Quaid film, because he's a good actor...and they played up the fact that it was unusual for someone so young to be in that position.
Watch 'No Strings Attached,' rather than wasting any time on this film. Two great actors, great script, great chemistry, feel good. This is a film Milla should have turned down 'cause it did nothing for her career, and only cemented for me to avoid Justin in starring roles. He's just not good. The only film I liked him in was 'Southland Tales,' but he didn't say that much, does a musical number, and it was more of a cameo that added a funny element to the film. This was probably one of the worst romantic comedies I've seen in a long time. Two thumbs down.
*** This review may contain spoilers ***
If you had read my comments you know my hatred for most romantic
comedies, as they are the same formula over and over again with
different names and actors. 2011 had a movie staring hot on the rise
Natalie Portman called No Strings Attached. An intelligent romantic
comedy about the realism on relationships, how sometimes there is no
way to get around having feelings for someone in our busy world. We
want that connection with someone and sometimes let it go before we
realize that we may have lost someone special. So almost in taking her
role too seriously, Mila Kunis who starred with Natalie Portman in
Black Swan playing a girl who is almost a little jealous of the lead's
talent, takes on the same like role. Playing the girl a small bit
different by being someone who does believe in love but thinks that
it's something wrong with her on why she can't find the right guy for
her. Can Justin Timberlake prove her wrong? What could have been a very
creative formula in making fun of how romantic comedies have taken over
most women's perceptions of what love should be instead of what's
reality, it turns back into the same tired old formula it's bashing in
the first place.
Jamie has the task of trying to recruit Dylan to interview for a job with GQ magazine, he comes to New York and after interviewing for the position learns from Jamie that he has been given an offer to work for GQ. Not knowing anyone else in the city he and Jamie quickly develop a friendship. One night, while hanging out at Jamie's apartment watching a romantic comedy, they get on the topic of sex and relationships. They come to the conclusion that sex should not come with so many emotional attachments. Both feeling the need for a physical connection they agree to have sex without emotion or commitment involved. After several trysts together Jamie comes to the realization that this isn't really what she wants, and she would like to start dating again and informs Dylan that they need to stop. But after many failed attempts on both parts they are both in a supposed shock when they realize they really like each other.
You name it, the cliché is there: the gay best friend, the misunderstanding, the workaholics, the walking down the street to some cheesy sappy pop song looking into the sky wondering how a love could go so wrong, the talking to an old person making the protagonist realize how they were wrong and must do something so dramatic to win the person back and of course the big make up kiss in front of a big crowd of people who feel the need to applause despite the fact that they don't know what is going on. Despite a lot of flaws the thing I do give credit too is that Mila and Justin do have some great chemistry bouncing back and forth off each other. Although they are such beautiful people and it's hard to believe that they are that hard up for some loving. Would I say this is a terrible romantic comedy? Not necessarily, I didn't feel my time was totally wasted, but I would recommend No Strings Attached over this as that was more realistic and had a better feel to it. But I think this was over all a good way to waste some time if you're looking for light hearted fun as the two leading actors make it worth your while. It's just a tired old formula that I wish could have a different ending for once. But that isn't coming any time soon as Hollywood needs to stick with the safe formula of having everyone live happily ever after and nothing more after that.
*** This review may contain spoilers ***
As with all comedies you will know from the first 5 minutes who will
end up with whom.
This movies is filled with nice features like flash mob action, but basically this movie is slow paced, not worth watching.
I was watching this movie with my girlfriend, after 20 min she asked me If we could please leave the theater. And we did, we went out to watch another movie.
Mila, you were funny in that 70's show, but Justin is bringing the worst out of you.
Justin was even more boring then he was in Bad teacher, As I quote not worth watching
*** This review may contain spoilers ***
It is difficult to believe that talented "Easy A" writer & director Will Gluck had anything to do with this shallow as well as satiric romantic comedy about a loquacious couple who tumble in the sack but shun wearing their feelings on the their respective sleeves. You'd think that these youngsters were the first who preferred sex without sentiment. Each of these commitment-leery lovers has been through the wringer in a previous relationship that left them with nothing but bad vibes and the desire to never succumb so such sadness again. Sexy Mila Kunis plays a single but sexually active corporate headhunter named Jamie who recruits Los Angeles-based website editor Dylan (Justin Timberlake of "The Social Network") to be the new art director opening at GQ magazine. Predictably, not only does Dylan take this dream job, but he also bundles up with Jamie in bed in an R-rated movie that lacks both steam and momentum. You will find about as much meaningful nudity here as you might find in an issue of Maxim magazine. The entire plot revolves around their relationship after coitus and the ups and downs that they endure before Gluck and scenarists Keith Merryman and David A. Newman bring the leads full circle in Grand Central Station in the Big Apple. Just to add some sparkle to the shenanigans we are treated to Patricia Clarkson cast as the liberated mom of our heroine who raves about the 1970s and Woody Harrelson as Tommy an openly gay sports writer. "Saturday Night Live" fans will recognize Andy Samberg breaking up with Mila in an opening gambit while Emma Stone ditches Timberlake. Probably the slickest thing that Gluck pulls off is his surprising cross-cutting between the guys and the gals in this scene. Initially, we assume that Mila and Jamie are breaking up until we see that it is two couples. Richard Jenkins injects some heavy-handed gravitas as Jamie's Alzheimer's addled father who steals every scene in which he appears. Gluck tries his best (or worst) to skewer the conventions of romantic comedies, but he only winds up skewering himself. Mind you, Mila has some nice-looking skin and Justin has a washboard belly to die-for if you're into looking physically fit. Unfortunately, good looks, great chemistry, and rapid-fire dialogue delivery cannot overcome the one cliché after another. Altogether, if you have not seen "When Harry Met Sally," watch "When Harry Met Sally after you see "Friends with Benefits."
Is not.. and maybe is good. Justin Timberlake is like a piece of wood.. and wood express emotions very hardly. Is not.. because "sex is like tennis" so.. its predictable from begging to end. Is not comedy to.. I try very hard to find any funny moments.. was hopeless. OK.. its maybe any interesting story here?.. Which mean.. you can watch this movie and you don't know what happen next? Sorry.. no! Wooden hero meets beautiful girl, go to bed, split up, hero talk with Yoda, they meet again.. end of story. Familiar? To much familiar for me. A few weeks ago I saw "No Strings Attached".. there Natalie Portman can lift and rescue this movie.. (another wooden hero BTW - Ashton Kutsher). Big Mila Kunis eyes can't help here. Its a pity. so.. what you get? you can remember something when you get out from cinema? Not too much I think... nothing maybe.. You forgot this movie before you arrive home. My prediction for Golden Raspberries this year: - worst scenario - worst couple - worst male performer - worst director
This movie was absolutely horrendous. There was not a single positive
aspect to this movie. First of all, it's not funny. Second of all, the
acting is lousy. I understand that this is a romantic comedy and it's
supposed to be a bit light and not so deep...but this was really bad. I
mean, there really wasn't a single truthful moment in this movie from
an acting perspective. I've seen children have more substance that
Justin Timberlake and his female counterpart. Third of all, this movie
was really awkward- like neither of these individuals have had sex in
their life..... Fourth, the plot/story is literally non-existent--> we
are literally forced to watch the first hour of the movie in this sort
of trance-like mirage of weird images of Justin trying to be funny in
bed with this chick....but all the audience could do is cringe in utter
embarrassment at this fiasco.
Fifth, they kept trying to get Justin Timberlake naked--> but is he supposed to have a great body or something? I mean he looks like a highschool kid...what woman is salivating for the body of a highschooler? They should have been doing everything possible to keep his clothes on and not off. The list of flaws could go on for infinite....this movie blows. I give it an F.
The only thing that keeps this movie from being a 1 is Woody Harrelson who's awesome as usual. I.e. he's the only positive to the entire movie.
"What Crap", would have made a much better title for this ridiculously
What is it foul? Do we really need to an explanation from Timberlake on why it's hard to urinate when a man is excited?
The film is replete with vulgarity's like this. It appears that rather than building on the film's few qualities, and it has a few, the producers decided to educate the opposite sex (whichever you happen to be) with crude innuendo on the other. It would appear they were trying to make the film interesting to 13 year old's.
This odd downplay to the audience in general goes hand in hand with the fact the film is simply a rehash of "No Strings Attached".
Mila Kunis, I expected better from you following, "The Black Swan"
Justin Timberlake, I expected nothing from you following, "Yogi Bear".
This felt so predictable and lacked any great acting; it felt like I'd
seen a version of this movie many times before.
I'm also just not a fan of Justin Timberlake as an actor; I don't think he's believable at all. Also love Shaun White but what was he thinking taking that horrific part?! His role was so odd...not funny or necessary; just weird.
The characters want to avoid clichés but the whole movie was one big cliché.
There was nothing overly humorous, new, or unique about this movie so doesn't stand out in terms of romantic comedy titles.
|Page 3 of 19:||            |
|Plot summary||Plot synopsis||Ratings|
|Awards||External reviews||Parents Guide|
|Official site||Plot keywords||Main details|
|Your user reviews||Your vote history|