No Reason (2010) User Reviews

Green's my favorite color.

[ElijahCSkuggs · 5/10 · 24 March 2012]

Ittenbach's latest diabolical mind-bender of the colorful kind may bemuse you as well as shrink your dink.

If I tried explaining the story to you, or even – I'm losing patience just thinking about it – discussing what it all means, I'd probably come across dumber than I sound right now. So, with that said, let's give it a shot! Ya got a girl who's visited by a tentacle bearded demon guy that is trying to teach her the truth of her ways by bringing her to different layers of some type of afterlife realm…or some sh!t like that. Hey ya know, that wasn't that bad of a summary. What's most important is knowing if Olaf's flick was able to deliver while his cast of characters did their thing. The answer is sure.

Pretty early on you get the picture that the story is a take it or leave it type of thing. I personally thought it stunk, but if you dig heady, weirdo German type story-telling then I guess you'll dig it…at least a little bit. But again, we know better. Ittenbach fans know better than to expect an average tale. We hope for one, but we don't expect. What we do expect is blood. So we sit there with our bibs on, waiting for that first splash.

It doesn't take long.

What No Reason does have going for it is that it's possibly one of the goriest films of the past couple years. Besides some lighting techniques that may have cut corners around how realistic the gore should look, the film still delivers on the blood front. There's a sequence, a hellish sequence you would say, where we stroll along through a torture dungeon of sorts that is basically just non-stop atrocities. Some creative stuff is going down too. Graphic is an understatement, as we peep peeing girls, some skin tearing, a bound to be classic penile mutilation, and of course, lots of blood spurting. It's the highlight of the film.

There are other scenes of OTT violence, and our leading lady is one hundred percent naked I'd say 80% of the movie - nice bum, small boobs, camel toe in your face. So as you see, there is enough here to keep your eyes glued to the screen. At a little over 70 minutes the film does feel longer because of Olaf's talky tale of colors, but I'd say it's definitely worth any gorehounds time as well as a must see for fans of Olaf, and, without a doubt, a definite for feminist gorehounds.

An average output for Olaf by my standards, but still, gore is gore, ass is ass, and how much more can you ask for when Ittenbach is in the big boy chair?

Mostly senseless. Don't bother.

[I_Ailurophile · 3/10 · 5 September 2022]

Six minutes wasted right off the bat, more than were needed to serve as contrast for what is to come. One scene of stark violence; two minutes of dubious editing and dialogue; 14 minutes of exposition. Even as some of the preceding moments are woven into the narrative thereafter, it's not until one-third of the runtime has passed that it seems like the movie begins in earnest. The concept sounds promising, and surely grotesque; the execution is distinctly uneven and wanting, sometimes needlessly obscene, and less than convincing. Whatever you think you're going to get out of 'No reason,' there's at best a 50-50 chance that you're right. For my part, I'm at best unsure this was worth my time.

Credit where it's due: the blood and gore looks good, and the effects generally. The violence and otherwise ghastly imagery is emphatically extreme, graphic, explicit, and excessive, including genital mutilation amidst near-constant nudity. Yet the crimson and viscera are also the bread and butter of the film, with any sense of plot being little more than an excuse for the visuals, so by that measure one would certainly hope this element is executed well. To that point, the makeup, prosthetics, and costume design mostly look pretty great, and mostly equally wretched. The exception is the cephalopod being, whose mask especially betrays the pointedly low-budget nature of the production, and the voice effects for whom are downright tawdry. I appreciate the set design and decoration, especially in the more gnarly scenes, and if a little on the nose, the use of lighting is pretty swell.

All this is well and good. On the other hand, the acting generally leaves much to be desired. The editing is wildly overzealous - presumably trying to compensate for weak material - including disjointed sequencing that adjoins poor writing. Individual scenes are mostly fine in theory (and do come off well in the bloodiest of instances); dialogue is laughably bad, and never more so than when there's any attempt at profundity (including the ending). Characters are a hodgepodge of half-baked ideas, as seemingly unfinished in concept as the story. No feature can survive poor writing. There are good ideas here, and the root premise of an ultra-violent journey through one's personal hell is a fantastic idea for a horror film. Yet the plot feels meagerly plastered together, barely attaining cohesiveness, and it's flimsy all the while. Again, it's clear the blood and gore were the top priority, but that's "no reason" for shortchanging the glue that holds a picture together. Olaf Ittenbach needed to spend more time developing his screenplay and less time imagining different ways to spill blood.

If all you want out of a horror film are a few scenes that arguably make it seem like the Cenobites exercise restraint, then you might get a kick out of 'No reason' as long as you fast-forward through about a collective half of the runtime otherwise. If you need more out of your genre flicks than simple, brutal violence, you've altogether come to the wrong place. I had high hopes, and they were dashed: it's a notion I'd like to see explored more earnestly, but this isn't the movie for any major degree of thoughtful storytelling or mindful film-making.

Between forgettable and garbage

[Horst_In_Translation · 2/10 · 28 March 2017]

"No Reason" is (despite the title) a German German-language film from 2010, so this one has its 7th anniversary this year. The writer and director is Olaf Ittenbach and this should already tell you what to expect here, especially if you read the name of Andreas Pape in the cast. It is horror with lots of violence. The lead actress is Irene Holzfurtner and she elevated the material and I must say I am a bit surprised here. But she does not elevate it enough for it to be an even mediocre outcome. There is a definite structure to this movie. The first part is the introduction. The second part is the collection of color sequences. Third part is the flashback to reality. And the final part is the epilogue with the central character being dead. I personally think parts 1 and 3 were somewhat decent and without the epilogue I maybe would have given it even 2 stars out of 5. But I just can't. Not just because of the epilogue, but also because the color sequences are so bad and so pretentious in how they are trying to deliver a deeper meaning and significance, but it's really just sex and gore. Nothing else. Like I said, this is a bit of a shame as the first 15-20 minutes were kinda solid. This is also why I would say that this is probably one of the better Ittenbach movies, but the fact that I still give it only 2 stars shows you how I don't like the "filmmaker" at all. Nonetheless it is pretty shocking that Ittenbach has made films for over 2 decades when this came out and it still so abysmal in quality. So yeah, there are occasional ups here (like the lead actress I mentioned earlier), but all in all I recommend everybody to stay far far away from this film. The best thing is really that it runs for 70 minutes only.

Garbage

[andreasorsoli · 1/10 · 26 May 2019]

Stay away from this movie,please. Everything is bad. GARBAGE

One of the most violent films of 2011....

[nightwatch4773 · 6/10 · 20 November 2011]

This movie wastes no time getting into gear exposing full frontal female nudity and excessive gore. This movie reminded me of some great horror films of 2010 such as The Farmhouse, Blood River and Devil but unfortunately for this German export, it didn't live up to its potential. The problem with this film is that it is too confusing and convoluted for the average gore fan. The acting is tenuous at best and the ending seems a little rushed although i did like the conclusion. Other negatives to this film were the special effects and the audio. Some effects were so bad and obviously fake that it took a bit of the gore authenticity away from the proceedings. The audio sounded like it came from another film at times and was badly recorded into this picture. It's not all doom and gloom for this picture, the pacing is good and moves along at a very crisp pace and for the budget I think the heart of this film was in right place. It also had a grimy '70's grind house feel reminiscent of great 1970's exploitation sleaze such as Malabimba and one of my all time favourite's Alucarda. So for those of you that love grisly gore and nudity running amok...proceed, the rest of you stay far far away.....

Creative, Depraved & Awesome

[bradleybean86 · 9/10 · 15 November 2012]

I spent a considerable amount of time trying to get ahold of this, so I was delighted to finally see the original movie (with eng subs) once I had procured it here in the states!

Olaf Ittenbach makes really cool and crazy over-the-top-not-necessary- but-now-that-you-mention-it-that's-kind-of-awesome type horror movies. He executes special effects with unquestionable brilliance - I dare any of you to create a CGI that has a comparable effect. - And the movies he directs often dispatch a rather generic plot that allows for such gore and action sequences to be thread together. Personally, I really enjoy his style and totally grasp where he's going with it.

This movie in particular shines for multiple reasons. The special effects and Gore in this film are abundant. In addition to that, it actually has a pretty good plot and interesting main character as well (who also happens to be completely nude for almost the entire film.)

It explores things like Drug Addiction, Mood & Mental Disorders, Heaven & Hell, Sensory Perception & Colors, while piecing together the heroine's memory and contrasting that with what ends up being the reality. It is somewhat self-important but it works for this film.

The musical score is EFFECTIVE, creepy, and surprisingly poignant considering the genre of film. While this movie did not reinvent the wheel, It certainly captures the elements necessary to make something resonate as creepy/scary/disturbing. This movie would STILL be very creepy without all the over-the-top violence and blood/gutspilling - However; The fact that it is there makes it even that much more delightful. Buy/Rent It ;)

Irene Holzfurtner makes this movie!

[helltopo · 7/10 · 22 December 2011]

Olaf Ittenbach's first love is plainly producing the most disgusting gore effects possible, so his fans will not be disappointed with 'No Reason'. Especially in the central part of the film the viewer is 'treated' to some of the most grisly effects you'll ever see - limbs are hacked off, flesh is torn, skulls are split and the blood never stops. The trouble is that Olaf and his team obviously spent the bulk of their time & energy on the gore scenes that actually don't add anything to the plot while not putting enough effort into some of the other sets. The majority of the cast give the kind of uninspired performances one associates with this genre, but not the lead actress. Irene Holzfurtner gives an outstanding performance despite having to be completely naked apart from blood & grime for the majority of her screen time. Ittenbach wisely cast the talented Ms Holzfurtner who was in her early forties rather than a younger, more nubile woman and this decision is what puts 'No Reason' above the standard gore offerings.

Excellent Gore But Little More

[AJ_Nel · 7/10 · 8 February 2022]

German underground horror (basically raw or extreme) director Olaf Ittenbach first came onto my radar with Premutos: The Fallen Angel. The gore was excellent but the rest really lack luster. This brings us to No Reason (2010), which was only recently released outside the festival scene). Again the gore was spectacular, and I mean almost on par with Marian Dora, spectacular. The cinematography and editing worked well with the Hellraiser meets Raw atmosphere. Irene Holzfurtner delivered an extremely strong performance. This brings us to the story, which with Ittenbach we do not expect to be there at all. Ironically there is a bit of a story and it is rather cleverly conveyed, mostly through the prologue and references to the book Holzfurtner's character is forced to read. A better script and tighter directing would have made it a really good film.

Enjoyable if nonsensical German splatterfest

[kannibalcorpsegrinder · 8/10 · 11 May 2021]

After being placed in a strange afterlife, a woman finds herself continuously forced to watch the torment of those around her to help determine the true value of a cruel lesson about herself, and the longer she stays in the tormented scenario the more her mind and body break which hinders her quest even further.

This was a generally solid but somewhat trouling genre effort. When this one works, it's due to the solid atmosphere that emerges from the setup that serves to unleash stomach-churning gore at every opportunity. Given the presentation offering up simple excuses for her to encounter the people from her life in a series of intense, brutal and well-choreographed torture sequences offering demonic creatures taking BDSM tools and other nefarious tools to graphically rip victims apart in unrelenting sequences, the film works rather nicely. Mangling parts and splitting open their body to generate spectacular gore-gags with oceans of bloodshed during the scene, these scenes stay in the mind rather nicely with the impressive nature of the setups including the scenes in various lighting arrangements that add an extra layer of psychological torment to the proceedings. This psychological approach carries over rather nicely into the general plotline involving her quest to uncover the truth about her tormented state and constant torture. The addition of the color-coded levels that are supposed to signal the separate points of her psyche that needs to be uncovered is a fantastic aspect introduced here as there's a lot of fun to be had with how this takes on the running storyline involving her surviving the torture to determine the point of the experience and purpose of her life. Regardless of the effectiveness this storyline aspect brings into the film, there's a lot of impressive work here that gives this a rather surprising and unforeseen final half which adds a lot to like with this one. That said, there are a few problems to be had with this one. The main issue is the generally confusing and nonsensical storyline that wraps all this surreal imagery and gore together which doesn't make any sense. Not only is there no excuse for a film like this that barely tops out at an hour to feature useless padding such as the visit from the mailman destroying the bathroom or the shopping trip picking up supplies that don't mean anything to the end result of the film but it tends to take up time that could've been spent spelling out what's going on. There's very little mentioned here about why she's going through this process to begin with since the beginning stages involving her everyday life don't signal this and to then put everything into this coded mystery involving the meaning of various colors and the connection to her own spiritual journey becomes quite confusing and disorienting.

Rated Unrated/NC-17: Continuous Full Male and Female Nudity, Extreme Graphic Violence, Extreme Graphic Language, perverse sexual actions and children-in-jeopardy.

Absolutely flawed, yet deep, weird and gross. Loved it.

[HaroldsOpinion · 8/10 · 15 February 2024]

There are aspects of this film that make it impossible to recommend to literally anyone. The extreme gore alone would turn most off. Add in near pornographic fetish sex and a lead actress that is entirely naked for about seventy percent of the film, and it's very easy to see why anyone would rate this a one or a zero. It's easy to tell at times-despite it being a German language film-that some of the cast are not great actors. I won't spoil any actual plot points, but am marking it for spoilers in case you want to see this one with zero knowlege of the actual content. The idea around color and redemption, the possibility of endless torment being up to the deceased, and the levels of hell you have to endure to achieve enlightenment are very interesting. It also gives a sense of hopelessness and dread that can be difficult to convey without it coming across as silly or pretentious. The gore effects range from very bad to disturbing, bad as in "that looks terrible". So be aware that there is a very good chance that this film was made for the director only. If you're feeling brave, go for it. If you're easily bothered absolutely forget it.