| Page 1 of 24: | [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] |
| Index | 235 reviews in total |
169 out of 243 people found the following review useful:
I did not expect it to be this good., 9 February 2012
![]()
Author:
Nesvrstani from Serbia
I'll be honest. When I saw the trailer, I was madly excited. It looked
fantastic. But then, after a while, I remembered, that the main point
of a trailer is to do just that. Hype the film, while revealing
literally all the main plot scenes and parts. I didn't know if it was
the case with 'Safe House', since, hey, it's Denzel Washington. That
man doesn't just do any role.
I just got back from the movie theater, and am I glad that I was wrong.
The movie is fantastic, electrifying. Do know that I don't just 'get
off' on any action flick. In most cases, I just watch and forget. This
was actually, fantastic. I don't have a single bad word to say about
it, the way it was directed, acted or anything else. Everything was
simply fantastic.
I realize my words sound absurd, and the score looks the same, but it
really is worth it. I didn't see an action movie this well written, and
this well acted in a really, really long time. Of course, by the end of
the movie, any experienced watcher will figure out the ending by
himself, but even though you 'get it', it's still extremely fun to sit
through and see how the pieces connect.
I really hate long reviews, so I'm trying to make this one as short and
sweet as possible. Lastly, have in mind that not one cast member failed
his role. Ryan was fantastic, even better then I could've imagined (a
nice showing of his acting skills after Green Lantern and Change-Up),
and Denzel, what to say that hasn't been already said about that man's
acting. Phenomenal doesn't cut it.
Go and see it. It's much better then anything else thats currently
'showing'.
85 out of 110 people found the following review useful:
This is NOT a safe house., 9 February 2012
Author:
John DeSando (jdesando@columbus.rr.com) from Columbus, Ohio
"I'm not your only enemy tonight." Tobin Frost (Denzel Washington)
In Safe House, Tobin Frost is one cool fugitive, but then he's played
by one of Hollywood's coolest actors: Denzel Washington. Guarding him
is young CIA agent Matt Weston played by the prominent film actor, Ryan
Reynolds. Together they make good acting possible; if only this crime
adventure would let them.
Instead, their moments are mere interludes to the cacophony of guns and
gore, a smorgasbord of thriller clichés planted in neat rows by
director Daniel Espinosa and blossoming glass and guts ad nauseam. As
the cool Frost escapes numerous captures and Weston follows him
(they've discovered the "safe house" is not so safe), I wish they'd sit
and talk for an hour because the older agent has much to tell the
younger about love (Matt has a questioning girlfriend) and survival in
the den of thieves known as espionageglobal that is. Frost has a
computer file with the names of bad cops, some of them friends and
supervisors. So nobody's safe.
Among the vulnerable are seriously good actors like Sam Shephard, Vera
Farmiga, Brendan Gleeson, and Robert Patrick. The shame is they have
parts so formulaic as to obliterate their acting excellence.
Anyway, you get the routine. The only surprise is that this type of
film continues to entertain us even when we know the plot points. In
part that's because we like to see good/bad guys played by the likes of
Denzel work their way through some challenging puzzles and achieve some
success just as we try to do in our daily lives. Also we get to see
multiple car crashes without being in them, a wish we may have
subconsciously when we experience road rage.
I suggest you leave your rational hat at home (most of the plot makes
little sense) and wear your thrill-seeking one because this film will
fulfill all your demands for excitement without touching a nerve in
your left brain.
95 out of 131 people found the following review useful:
Danzel Saves What Really Is A Mess, 10 February 2012
Author:
Harmon from United States
It's an interesting albeit predictable action flick that's nothing special but delivers enough to make it worthwhile. It does feature what has to be the dumbest CIA operatives/handlers ever put on film. What transpires, especially early, will make most viewers say "why in the world didn't they just " but getting past that means enjoying a film where Denzel Washington perfectly menaces and charms his way through every scene. Put just about anyone else in this role and the film would lose a lot. Ryan Reynolds was good enough and the rest of the stellar supporting cast is absolutely wasted. Again, I found it interesting despite it being three repetitive acts of mindless turns highlighting that the government is pure evil and they apparently keeping hiring the same set of mindless goons who race around guns blazing everywhere with little effect or competence whatsoever. Also, the camera work was AWFUL in terms of the overuse of the shaky cam.
72 out of 89 people found the following review useful:
Nothing really new but a good choice of actors, effects and locations, 22 February 2012
![]()
Author:
kluseba from Chicoutimi, Canada
If you have seen conspiracy flicks like "Enemy Of The State", "The
Bourne Identity", "XIII", "Unknown" and so on and so forth, you really
won't be surprised by this movie. The story presents nothing new and is
about the usual stereotypes: the good one turn out to be the bad ones,
the bad ones turn out to be the good ones, the weak ones turn out to be
the strong ones and so one. I think you get what I mean. The movie has
no big surprises after all.
But if this kind of movie is well done, it can still merit a rating of
eight points. I only give six point five and for this site seven points
because of the mediocre camera work that was shaking and irritating at
some points of the movie.
The rest of the film is quite decent. The locations are interesting and
the movie takes place in Cape Town in South Africa and not in Europe or
North America. The fighting and action scenes are very well done and
with the visual and sound effects in cinema, it's a pleasant
entertainment to watch this movie for sure. It's a good flick to change
your mind, to relax and to take a break from your everyday life for
sure. The acting is also rather good with two strong lead actors that
are a very cool Denzel Washington and a sympathetic and determined Ryan
Reynolds.
The only little flaw is that I would have liked to know more about both
characters, especially about their past and what really led them to do
what they actually do in the movie.
The movie simply has not the greatest script to stand out among many
other similar flicks but it's still a good film. I would suggest you to
rather watch the movies I talked about in my introduction or classics
like "I As In Icarus" but if you have seen and liked them all, you will
surely appreciate this work, too.
55 out of 73 people found the following review useful:
Reynolds & Washington a Strong Duo, 11 February 2012
![]()
Author:
Richard Reilly (FFman@comcast.net) from Colorado
It is so very difficult to find new material when you piece together a
governmental conspiracy movie. Safe House is able to do it to a point.
The greatest success of this movie is the usage of modern film
techniques. Too often the bulging budget and ability to edit in effects
makes action/thriller movies extremely unrealistic. Safe House does the
opposite. It takes all of these techniques and uses them to make the
movie raw and real.
The actors were hand-picked perfectly for their roles. Ryan Reynolds is
the actor you have to use when you want to put a likable, relatable
family man in a difficult situation. As a CIA operative caught up in
something far outside his experience, he fits in perfectly. As for
Denzel Washington, there is little that he can't do. For the unique
character of Tobin Frost, there is no better man to fill the role.
Together they form a storyline that merely needs to be able to stand on
its own two feet. The storyline does stand on its own. That being said,
it is the weakest part of the movie. The twists have all been seen
before. This movie doesn't offer new plot points to the old conspiracy
theory movie. It merely adds new characters. The new characters are
great, but it is not enough. In order for the movie to be great, it
needed to give something new to the story.
I must say that the end was beautiful. Without giving anything away, it
was gracefully preformed. It wrapped up the loose ends that too many
other movies simply leave hanging. It adds a whole other dimension to
Ryan Reynolds' character. It will, without a doubt, leave you wanting
more but somehow completely satisfied.
Safe House is worth a trip to the theatre. With thrillers such as this
one, the action is better on the big screen. Between the action and the
actors, you will not be disappointed. Next to Liam Neeson's The Grey,
this is one of the best action movies so far this year. The thing is,
it could have been even better. Too bad.
reillyreviews.wordpress.com
59 out of 87 people found the following review useful:
"Safe House" is a exhilarating action thriller with explosive stunts and sequences., 7 February 2012
![]()
Author:
deanccastano from United States
One of the CIA's most wanted, Tobin Frost (Denzel Washington), is back
on the run after a ten-year disappearance. This alerts the CIA and
sends their team to a gripping chase in Cape Town, South Africa. At a
remote location, the CIA's safe house is guarded by a rookie operative,
Matt Weston (Ryan Reynolds). The house have been empty for years,
involving no guests or action. At the arrival of Frost and the
intelligence, a brutal investigation occurs. Phased by the presence of
a notorious criminal, Weston becomes nervous and confused. In the midst
of questioning, mercenaries invade the house and begins a killing spree
in an effort to kidnap Frost as well. Frost reminds Weston, that as a
house guest, he is to be protected. This sends Weston to a dizzying
panic and eventually escapes along with Frost.
"Safe House" is a exhilarating action thriller with explosive stunts
and sequences. The team behind the film stages multiple exciting scenes
that involve beat down rooftops in the rural areas as well as
heart-stopping car chases along the streets. Frost is an intelligent
man. Being a former intelligence, who's gone rogue, he knows the rules
and procedures. Most of the time, he's fascinated by watching Weston
carry out his duties. Weston is continuously conflicted, looking for
ways to hide Frost. Yet, Frost never makes it easy for him, as he tries
to escape as well. Weston communicates with one of his supervisors,
David Barlow (Brendan Gleeson), to determine their next move. But, the
gunmen are determined to kill Frost, forcing Weston to take matters
into his own hands.
Denzel Washington is an actor full of intensity. He can sit there and
watch Reynolds do his thing and still convey the deepest of his
character's emotions. He gives Frost both a terrifying presence and a
sympathetic feel. Ryan Reynolds, on the other hand, manages to stand
along Washington and give the same intensity. His wits and charisma
works perfectly for his distressed rookie persona. The film succeeds
best because of this tandem, allowing the actors to build a good enough
relationship to carry out the entire film.
"Safe House" is a great action thriller with non-stop action. This is
the first mainstream feature for Daniel Espinosa and he comes forth as
promising due to his skillful camera work with the action scenes. One
of the most impressive is the rooftop chase at night. The editing is
pitch perfect as it allows the audience to feel the danger of the
situation from each point of view. This film could have been bleak and
predictable if the leads were miscast but Washington and Reynolds'
enigma make the film satisfyingly fun and fresh.
deanslisters.tumblr.com
31 out of 41 people found the following review useful:
Predictable but Entertaining, Excellent Performances, 22 February 2012
![]()
Author:
bdgill12 from United States
I'm of the opinion that out of all the movie stars and would-be movie stars in Hollywood, Denzel Washington is one of, if not THE, safest bet. I say this because I don't think I've ever met a person who dislikes the man. In a culture that is built upon strong opinions and holding to said opinions fiercely (this is the backbone of the industry in many ways), it is a remarkable feat to put together a 20+ year career like Denzel has without drawing the ire of someone or some group. Age, race, and gender seem to matter not when it comes to Denzel, whose films almost always find a way to exceed expectations whether they are magnificent (Training Day, American Gangster) or wholly lackluster (John Q, Unstoppable). There is an overriding sense among a high percentage of moviegoers that if Denzel is in, so are they. Safe House, a solid if uninspired action thriller, has proved this theory to be true. Instead of the undercover investigations and shoot outs he expected when he joined the CIA, Matt Weston (Ryan Reynolds) has been relegated to manning a safe house in Cape Town, South Africa. He is bored and he wants some action, a desire that is all too well fulfilled at the outset of the film when former CIA agent-turned-traitor Tobin Frost (Washington) is brought to his house for interrogation. Soon after his arrival, a militant force arrives to take possession of Frost, killing the highly-trained team that brought Frost into the house. With no other option, Weston grabs Frost and makes a bolt for it, barely escaping the unknown villains who killed his comrades. With no other teams in the area, Weston's superior, David Barlow (Brendan Gleeson), tasks him with keeping Frost alive and in custody until he can be collected, a proposition which turns out to be much more difficult and complex than Weston would have ever imagined. With the assailants hot on their trail and Frost crawling deeper and deeper in Weston's head, the young agent must think fast and learn on the run before he becomes another casualty of a dirty battle that Frost has sucked him into. There are a few departures from the main storyline at work within Safe House but these distractions are only there to lengthen the film and add some uninteresting depth. This film lives and dies on the performances of Reynolds and Washington, both of whom come through beautifully. It's been a rough year for Reynolds whose star status has been thrown into serious question with the failures of Green Lantern and The Change-Up. This role, however, is a better fit for him, allowing him to share the load with an established genre veteran instead of being relied upon to carry a major film on his own. I was pleasantly surprised at his ability to give Weston more depth than what you usually get with this sort of film and I thought he hit the right balance between being a half- terrified, inexperienced field agent and being that hardened, "see this thing through to the bitter end" character that Safe House had to have. Washington, meanwhile, is a tour de force, exuding both charisma and menace in just the right amounts. Always a commanding presence on the screen no matter what his role, Washington is at his best when delivering his lines in that quiet, calm, measured manner which he has become famous for and this is a role that calls upon that ability several times. I can't say that this is one of Washington's best portrayals and it's certainly a safer choice than I'd like to see an actor of his caliber make, but it is nonetheless a reminder of exactly why just about everybody digs what this guy has been selling for two decades. Every other element of Safe House plays second fiddle to the work done by the two leads. The action is intense and somewhat gritty; when a shot is fired, you feel it as much as hear it, a characteristic I quite like in a serious action film. The plot itself is rife with generalities and clichés, making the film about as paint-by-numbers as they come. Personally, though, I didn't get caught up in these half-hearted missteps too often. Better choices could certainly be made; the major "twist" could be seen from a mile away and the conclusion was unsatisfactory for me. But given director Daniel Espinosa's relative inexperience behind the camera and the sheer power of Washington's star appeal, these are issues I found easy to overlook as the film progressed. It's nothing new and it's not a film I want to watch a dozen times over but for what it is, Safe House provides an entertaining and appealing experience.
21 out of 23 people found the following review useful:
Conventional but Effective Action-Thriller, 16 June 2012
![]()
Author:
Claudio Carvalho from Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
In Cape Town, South Aftica, the rookie CIA agent Matt Weston (Ryan
Reynolds) is a safe house keeper and is in love with his French
girlfriend Ana Moreau (Nora Arnezeder) that does not know about his
double life.
When the most wanted rogue and former CIA agent Tobin Frost (Denzel
Washington) surrenders to the American Consulate to escape from an
attack of dangerous soldiers of fortune, he is brought to the safe
house to be interrogated by the specialist Daniel Kiefer (Robert
Patrick) and his team. However there is a breach in the safe house and
mercenaries break in the place expecting to capture Tobin Frost and
they kill Daniel and his men. Matt escapes with Tobin and he contacts
the CIA senior management Harlan Whitford (Sam Shepard), David Barlow
(Brendan Gleeson) and Catherine Linklater (Vera Farmiga) that give
instruction to Matt to reach another safe house with the prisoner. But
Tobin warns Matt that there is an informer in the CIA and he shall not
trust in anyone.
"Safe House" is a conventional but effective action-thriller with the
usual shootings, car chases and explosions. But the great cast, with
the charismatic Denzel Washington and Ryan Reynolds; great veteran
actors Brendan Gleeson and Sam Shepard; the always excellent Vera
Farmiga; and the gorgeous and unknown Nora Arnezeder, makes the
difference. The Hollywoodian commercial happy end is unrealistic but
certainly will pleasure a great number of viewers. My vote is seven.
Title (Brazil): "Protegendo o Inimigo" ("Protecting the Enemy")
24 out of 36 people found the following review useful:
Too much of too little., 10 February 2012
![]()
Author:
Quietb-1 from United States
*** This review may contain spoilers ***
From the trailers you know it's not such a safe house. Denzel
Washington doesn't break a sweat. Ryan Reynolds never stops sweating.
Vera Farminga is unconvincing as a high level CIA agent spouting
exposition.
Plenty of redundant shoot outs, car chases and fights. Generic bad guys
kill plenty of we didn't know them good guys. Up close, and in the
actors face, digital photography is far too grainy.
Trendy CIA bashing. Quick pace. Plenty of action but not much new or
interesting in this except perhaps the South Africa locations. Wait for
the DVD.
22 out of 33 people found the following review useful:
Denzel and his rules, mentoring yet another rookie, 13 February 2012
![]()
Author:
www.ramascreen.com from United States
*** This review may contain spoilers ***
-- www.Ramascreen.com --
Here we go again with Denzel mentoring a rookie by sharing some of his
ground rules. SAFE HOUSE is very formulaic, it only makes you think
like it's smart and if it weren't for the intense, unforgiving
gunfights, one of the most exciting I've seen in cinema (Tombstone's
gunfight still takes top honor) SAFE HOUSE probably wouldn't have much
going to help me recommend it to you
Training Day, Unstoppable, and now SAFE HOUSE, you'd pair up Denzel as
a seasoned, experienced character with a rookie or a newbie who
eventually steps up to the plate. Denzel is back as Mr. know it all,
Mr. one step ahead of you, and he'd proudly preach it too whether or
not you'd want to hear it. Ryan Reynolds plays the next Pine or the
next Hawke, and just like those other guys, Reynolds' character is
fully equipped with the knowledge and is highly skilled but now,
situation has shifted to where it forces him to put his own skills to
the test. The rookie is always motivated to prove himself worthy and
the unlikely mentor, who's used to working alone and has all kinds of
ethos, is always entertained by the idea of having a protégé. By the
way, why can't Swedish director Daniel Espinosa find his own tone, his
own style? Why does he have to make the film look as if it was helmed
by Denzel's go-to director, Tony Scott?! It even has that A-D-D feel to
it.
I don't necessarily think David Guggenheim's script is all that clever,
it's not terrible, but it's nowhere near impressive. Don't get me
wrong, the concept is fantastic, a CIA house being breached and you
don't know who's responsible and who else may be on it, the line
between bad guys and good guys get blurred, those are necessary
elements for a pulse pounding thriller. But those of us hardcore fans
of thrillers, may it be political or whodunit crime, would easily
notice that all that Guggenheim did was put all the CIA smart
vocabularies and slang into Tobin Frost's lips (Denzel) and then have
the CIA repeats the same thing in their own little playroom and then
Guggenheim would throw a series of massive chaos in between. It doesn't
take a genius to figure out the bad guy either because you'd always go
with the one who seems to be the most supportive, the one who wants to
see the protagonists find safety, just so that they may get to them in
time and retrieve whatever it is that they withhold, so SAFE HOUSE is
exciting but it's hardly smart and it's certainly nothing new.
-- www.Ramascreen.com --
| Page 1 of 24: | [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] |
| Plot summary | Plot synopsis | Ratings |
| Awards | External reviews | Parents Guide |
| Official site | Plot keywords | Main details |
| Your user reviews | Your vote history |