Critic Reviews

72

Metascore

Based on 10 critic reviews provided by Metacritic.com
91
At once an unsentimental portrait of the ambitious singer who thought himself bound for glory, and an affecting elegy for a time when song was a form of revolution.
83
Many of the interviews in the film - conducted with everyone from family members to Christopher Hitchens and Tom Hayden - look to be 10, even 20, years old. Together they concoct a complex portrait of an ultimately unknowable man.
80
Briskly constructed and rich in Ochs' music and period notables, Kenneth Bowser's film will be a must for the artist's fans, but its fresh take on an overexamined decade should also appeal to Kennedy-era completists.
80
Kenneth Bowser's terrific documentary is a poignant portrait of an uncompromising artist.
80
Beautiful and melodic as well as pointedly political.
70
Though hewing to a too-conventional structure, Bowser's film is densely researched enough to yield insights not just into its overlooked subject, but also into his overly analyzed era.
70
The New York Times
The story told by Mr. Bowser's film is complicated and tragic.
60
Time Out New York
It's a well-constructed and long-overdue tribute, yet Fortune refrains from delving into larger questions that surround Ochs's work. Did the singer's unwavering dedication to agitpop leave him stranded in the '60s? And does Ochs's diminished legacy among today's essentially apolitical neofolkies amount to a second tragedy?
60
Though Bowser uses old footage when possible, the absence of his subject -- who died tragically in 1976 -- is keenly felt.
50
Not only is a good look at a man who carved a small but important niche into the folk world but a good record of the turbulent 1960s and what motivated its protesters.

More Critic Reviews

See all external reviews for Phil Ochs: There But for Fortune (2010) »

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Reviews | User Ratings | External Reviews | Message Board