Doctor Who (2005– )
7.1/10
2,873
8 user 9 critic

The Vampires of Venice 

The Doctor and Amy cross swords in more ways than one with a horde of blood-sucking vampires in 16th century Venice.

Director:

Writer:

Reviews

Watch Now

$0.00 with Prime Video

WATCH NOW
ON DISC

Videos

Photos

Edit

Cast

Episode complete credited cast:
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
Vampire Girl (as Sonila Vieshta)
...
Michael Percival ...
Inspector
Simon Gregor ...
Steward
Edit

Storyline

Amy's fiancé Rory is having his stag night just before their wedding and none other than the Doctor who pops through the cake. He's soon aboard the Tardis where they travel to 16th century Venice where the Doctor is intrigued by Lady Rosanna Calvieri who runs a prestigious school for girls. Guido is Venetian who is now trying to get his daughter Isabella out of there when they all realize the school is a nest of vampires. The Doctor thinks they're made it too easy for them to learn about their vampirism and thinks they are hiding something far more sinister. Written by garykmcd

Plot Summary | Add Synopsis


Certificate:

See all certifications »

Parents Guide:

 »
Edit

Details

Official Sites:

Country:

Language:

Release Date:

8 May 2010 (UK)  »

Filming Locations:

 »

Company Credits

Production Co:

,  »
Show detailed on  »

Technical Specs

Runtime:

Sound Mix:

Color:

Aspect Ratio:

16:9 HD
See  »
Edit

Did You Know?

Trivia

Steven Moffat chose Toby Whithouse to write this episode based on his work on Being Human (2008). See more »

Goofs

Although the Doctor never tells Rosanna his name when they first meet in her throne room, she still calls him by name - "Doctor". See more »

Quotes

Rory Williams: You owe Casanova a chicken?
See more »

Connections

References SpongeBob SquarePants (1999) See more »

Soundtracks

Doctor Who Theme
(uncredited)
Written by Ron Grainer
Arranged by Murray Gold
Performed by BBC National Orchestra of Wales
See more »

Frequently Asked Questions

This FAQ is empty. Add the first question.

User Reviews

 
Better, but there are still timing issues. . .
8 May 2010 | by (Canada) – See all my reviews

This was a fun episode, but once again the new creative minds behind Matt Smith's Doctor were swollen on enthusiasm and good ideas, but starved on time. It's a real shame, because there is so much genuine good energy in this new series, but the hour time-slot just isn't a big enough canvas, and as a result, the finished product once again felt rushed.

Moffat should stick to two-parters. The previous Stone Angels two-episode story was wonderful; the pacing fit the amount of material. But Vampires, while not as horribly crammed as "The Beast Below", still suffered, particularly in the last quarter.

I want to point out that just because there is a lot of good intention and obvious skill in these new episodes, it should NOT be taken as a free pass. Episodes 2 and 3 of this current season of DW were so bad it actually hurt to watch them. They could have been brilliant, but instead they were disasters of which the creators should be ashamed.

Vampires was nearly good enough, worth a 7 out of 10, but it would have been an easy 9 had it been stretched out for another fifty minutes.

I shudder to imagine what this episode must have played like on American TV where an extra five minutes was cut out to make room for more advertising!


15 of 44 people found this review helpful.  Was this review helpful to you?

Message Boards

Recent Posts
I wonder if they named the new Companion Bill as a homage to... neBBen438834
The Paternoster Gang gagemichaeljohn
Peter Kay as Craig Sonic_whovian
Best and worst episode. lucylight-68075
Triangle Movie.. anyone? mydecipheredcode
"Dr. Who" The_Weeping_Prophet
Discuss The Vampires of Venice (2010) on the IMDb message boards »

Contribute to This Page

Create a character page for:
?