Lucy is a university student who is working a number of jobs. She volunteers at a research lab, works at a coffee shop, and as a photocopy clerk in an office. She responds to an advertisement and embarks on an erotic freelance job in which she is required to sleep in bed alongside paying customers. Written by
An interesting choice. Prostitution amidst university students. Rich
old men who spend their money on flesh. Modern 'dettachment'...
separating the body from the heart, the soul, the mind. Most of the
critics of this film seem to dwell on complaining that "our world is
not like that! All the people here are horrible...!!!" Of course they
are missing the point. We are watching crude realities, but also
dreams, symbols, Freudian/Jungian fetishes... A woman is directing.
Jane Campion is producing. This is also a 'clue' that MAYBE there is
more to this film than meets the eye... Behind the veneer are MANY
hidden truths.( Behind the Twin Towers, behind the choice of a black
president after a guy like Bush jr.) Separation from the truth. We are
all 'anaesthetised'... so Lisa is NOT so strange, after all. Money
rules. Maybe we are victims of our society, of our times. We are
'dead', as T.S. Eliot wrote some years ago. Of course the world is full
of wonderful, hearty, passionate and generous people. But this film
aims elsewhere, and I myself feel grateful to its director,
scriptwriter (and , why not, actress) for taking the plunge, and
re-floating Pasolini's 'Salò' in a more digestible (maybe more
intelligent?) guise. Kubrick? His last movie may still reveal something
in the future (ALL his films age very well), but he was an elderly man,
and this young director seems to have the upper-hand in as much as
hitting the nail on the head with the 'ésprit-du-temps', the
'Zeitgeist' or, more plainly,(and painfully), the new age our youth are
forced to grow up in. Somewhat puzzled at first, I gave this film a
chance...let it 'breathe', in my conscience and intellect. I'm glad I
did. It contains more than one morsel of food for thought.
27 of 44 people found this review helpful.
Was this review helpful to you?