This documentary is not only fascinating but, for me, this very topic raises many further questions, ones which, as it happens, apparently are not new at all & have been periodically raised for nearly a century, albeit ignored every single time. Worse yet, many pioneer doctors who HAVE raised this same question about cancer as infectious, as contagious, as fungal, as bacterial AND as viral, all were hounded & persecuted by the people in charge. How can they NOT already know this disease is transmissible? It is a matter of record that one doctor got an identical sarcoma after he accidentally injected himself with a biopsy needle containing the sarcoma cells of a cancer patient. More proof? If one has had NO chemical treatment for cancer, why is it still the rule that no one with cancer can be permitted to donate blood? The very idea of the establishment being aware that cancer seems to be potentially catching seriously begs the question of the claims for any efficacy of the standard pharmaceutical orthodoxy of the same old same old Big Three,- meaning the unchanged since inception protocol of chemotherapy, radiation, & surgery. Just rethink the implications here: Imagine cancer as an infection, granted a very serious infection, but therefore potentially as a condition which is quite curable. What POSSIBLE excuse would there be any longer for extreme toxins as a treatment at that point? OOOPS! There would go THAT multi trillion dollar a year non cure industry!
See also
Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews
