1 user 1 critic

Ukroshchenie stroptivykh (2009)


(as Igor Kalenov)


(as Igor Kalenov),


Add Image Add an image

Do you have any images for this title?



Cast overview, first billed only:
Igor Lifanov ...
Yuliya Galkina ...
Katya Kolycheva
Andrey Noskov ...
Vitaliy Murzin
Andrey Fedortsov ...
Mikhail Bogdasarov ...
Zoya Buryak ...
Glavnyy po nayke
Boris Grachevskiy ...
Boris Grachevskiy
Aleksandr Tyutryumov
Arkadiy Koval
Gali Abaydulov
Nodar Dzhanelidze ...
(as Nadar Dzhanelidze)
Aleksandr Rusinov
Katarina Pudar


Add Full Plot | Add Synopsis





Official Sites:



Release Date:

29 October 2009 (Russia)  »

Also Known As:

The Taming of the Shrews  »

Company Credits

Production Co:

,  »
Show more on  »

Technical Specs



See  »

Did You Know?


Version of ShakespeaRe-Told: The Taming of the Shrew (2005) See more »

Frequently Asked Questions

This FAQ is empty. Add the first question.

User Reviews

Expectations have justified
16 November 2009 | by See all my reviews

Expected a good comedy My expectations have justified. Have justified with interest, it not simply good, but a magnificent comedy. Has gone on this film to a cinema with the friends. Have laughed perfectly. Time did not consider, but the smile did not leave me and my friends in a current of all session. It was very cheerful. The plot, in my opinion, is thought over well. Certainly, there are nuances, but from a film they have not affected a general impression. I liked the scenario, successfully picked up actors whom the roles have perfectly played. Succession of events a bit predicted, but fairly decorated with good, kind jokes. Really, I have looked a film on one breath, equally worried about all heroes, expected the good, light termination of a film. The light termination is, but it is a little притемнённое that businessman Murzik remained one. As to flight of a bee, it no more than to what not adhered scene inserted into a film simply so, for a change. I consider it is not necessary to do a point of issue from this.

Here I would like to allocate the basic heroes, actors, to give them characteristics: Anna Semenovich, played blonde Marina, girl Fedi, frankly mows first half of film under the foolish. At first I not especially understood, for what it so conducts herself, but then when it has opened Fede that behaves so because heard that men like foolish girls more, I have understood all. It has appeared the film critic. At them with Fedej, fortunately, on a film all has ended well because he very much loved cinema. Anna Semenovich has served its purpose with high self-return, its heroine was interesting any more by the beauty, and true I, is artificial in the covered image of the foolish blonde. It has perfectly served its purpose. I can without exaggeration, tell to it "Gallantly".

Igor Lifanov, huntsman Mihalych, strange enough person at first. But on plot process, it appears very formed person whom becoming the huntsman, has decided to disappear from the city problems. Its character too very amusing first, but equally also is interesting by the change. Михалыч becomes more liberated. As acknowledgement it is served by that in the end of a film, Katya who has thrown businessman Murzika, remained with it. As far as I understand, both of them the friend the friend were pleasant, that at first will not tell.

Julia Galkin, model Ekaterina Kolycheva, too the character which should be noticed. Its unusual, whimsical character from the beginning even irritated me. But then, having changed, as well as all other protagonists of a film, even began to cause interest to the person. She has learnt to milk a cow, and also without problems to get eggs which got to it with great difficulties earlier. As it seems to me, it has found the happiness in the name of huntsman Mihalycha.

Andrey Fedortsov, Fedja, Marina's guy, did not understand it in the beginning. After their straight talk, they could not come off from each other, it was about what to talk — about cinema which was pleasant both Fede, and Marina. On a plot at all of them has ended well, even it is possible to tell remarkably. It would be desirable to be glad for them. But I will return to the description of character Fedortsova. Its character is attractive that after fair quantity of misunderstanding with Marina, all the same reaches mutual understanding with it, finding thus, the happiness.

Andrey Noskov, the businessman of "Murzik". Too rather interesting hero of a film of which frankly became a pity to me. It has not found the happiness — it remained one. That has not turned out to reach at it to what mutual understanding with Katya. It, of course, the sad fact, unique unpleasant in this comedy. But after all all cannot be always good at all. It once again underlines originality of the scenario on which this film has been shot. Itself Socks has served its purpose too very well.

Also I wish to note Igor Kalyonova's big director's work, the talented director which besides the straight line, director's work, became one of script writers and producers of this film.

After viewing of a film it would be desirable to thank all those people whom I have listed also which have not entered into my transfer, but worked over this fine and kind film, for the given huge pleasure which I have received after viewing of their creation. The film has turned out very ridiculous and kind. It would be desirable that such films was more and more.

1 of 5 people found this review helpful.  Was this review helpful to you? | Report this
Review this title | See one user review »

Contribute to This Page