IMDb > The Chicago 8 (2011) > Reviews & Ratings - IMDb

Reviews & Ratings for
The Chicago 8 More at IMDbPro »

Filter: Hide Spoilers:
Index 5 reviews in total 

4 out of 5 people found the following review useful:

Highly problematic but tolerable

6/10
Author: Rodrigo Amaro (rodrigo882008@hotmail.com) from São Paulo, Brazil
15 April 2013

Good call but I'm gonna wait for Spielberg's side of the story, planned for ages and with a stellar-cast to be released in who knows when. He's the one who has the mind, patience, the people and the money to make something truly unforgettable and award winning. Meanwhile we have this which is quite troubled. Too fast, too unbelievable despite the use of the actual trial transcripts, messy time and time again and poorly made. Not having the funds necessary doesn't mean simplistic takes on such a thought-provoking real life story.

It's not all wrong, it just seems to be in that way. From the awkward presentation to the editing mess and going with some average to bad performances, "The Chicago 8" diminishes the impact of the events that took place in between 1968 and 1970, going from the riots at the Democratic National Convention which led to Nixon's green light the prosecutions from the allegedly inciters (young activists opposed to the Vietnam war) in 1969, more problematic than the protests, delayed and agitated time and time again due to the conflictive nature of the eight men accused against a biased and authoritarian judge (played by a histrionic Philip Baker Hall).

The director's big and failed idea is to be and present more than it can eat, bite and chew. It shifts from being a clichéd panorama of the 1960's with its sex, drugs and rock n'roll ideas to the serious drama concerning one of the most infamous cases of the American judicial system, and several comedic moments, everything altogether. Like a scratched 78 rpm vinyl, this goes almost nowhere with its repetitive scheme: trial, mess in the court, the defendants get beaten up, judge gets out of order, the prosecution always gets favorable motions from the man, the defense doesn't get same treatment and the judgment doesn't go on. Slap. Again. Slap. Again. Minor variation of the events. Again. It goes in circles for too long without explaining some facts - like why Bobby Seale (Orlando Jones) was arrested and the other 7 kept free to plan their defense better. Those who don't know the story will be completely lost. Not to mention it's too one dimensional, doesn't expose the other side of the quarrel, the government reactions and reasons for keep this circus going on. It might be covered with the truth but it doesn't pass the image of being authentic, credible. I don't know which was more unbelievable or was the biggest travesty of all: the movie or the real trial.

Major reason to enjoy this: the acting coming from the young stars, specially Danny Masterson (playing Jerry Rubin), Thomas Ian Nicholas (best in scene playing Abby Hoffman), Jones plays a good Bobby Seale but not as good as Courtney B. Vance in "Panther" and a quite remarkable Gary Cole playing the Chicago 8 lawyer. The young actors were dedicated, relatable and truly inspiring sometimes, eclipsing heavyweights like Baker Hall and Steven Culp. It's a shame they don't have much of a elaborated text to work with which reduced their roles to cheesy lines, some dull moments and one or two great lines of dialog.

I liked this movie but felt that there's something missing. It's such a powerful and interesting case that doesn't get translated to the screen with the same verve. 6/10

Was the above review useful to you?

2 out of 2 people found the following review useful:

Bad film making

6/10
Author: SnoopyStyle
23 October 2013

I don't know how true this movie is to the events of the trial. I do know that this is badly made by Pinchas Perry. The trial may be significant and the events important. But that just means that this subject should be done by someone much better skilled. Although the story is compelling enough to watch. By no means did I finish the film for its artistry.

In a rare instant, Philip Baker Hall overacts as an angry frustrated judge. Even if they're operating from the actual transcripts, I doubt that the judge would be raving like a rabid dog. And even if he was a rabid dog, it plays like overacting on the screen. It's a rare moment when I dislike PBH's acting. This movie is that rare moment.

The whole thing is a diatribe against the government prosecution. But it rarely gives any credence to the other side. If anything, the jury is treated like idiots who just want to go home. If they ease up, they could actually create compelling characters.

The trial has all the best scenes. Most everything else is weak. It should enlighten the audience to the times, but it does little more than stereotypes and stock news footage. The film should restrict itself to the trial until they could figure out how to make a movie.

And the split screen style is a big fail. It puts a big sign pointing to how the director has no idea how to cut a movie to maximize tension. It's a gimmick that doesn't fit and makes no sense here.

The last third lost it energizer bunny, Bobby Seale. The energy is noticeably diminished, and the movie desperately wants to have a scene with Bobby Seale in that section. Instead of a compelling climax, it fizzles in a haze of political preaching.

I'm barely recommending this only for people to learn something and hopefully do their own research on that era.

Was the above review useful to you?

0 out of 1 people found the following review useful:

Unwatchable

1/10
Author: ChristianDiorScientist from Ontario
20 November 2013

The triumvirate of directing, writing, and acting was completely out of whack in this film and the bulk of the blame goes to the director. Despite the poorly written script, the actors manage to pull off some believability, but the overall film is otherwise an epic fail of bad directing, editing, and historical detailing.

The movie tries to take on too much and fails on all counts of telling anyone's side of the story. The most impressive part of the film is how a young director managed to get so many capable actors and find the money to green light this project.

I think the biggest surprise is how the costuming was so badly done. 1969 has to be one of the easiest time periods to recreate since there is a ton of the clothes from the period still available, it's cheap and easy to find, and there are loads of images to study. The slap dash costuming is just a symptom of the very poor effort put into this film.

Was the above review useful to you?

1 out of 3 people found the following review useful:

Fantastic depiction of a decisive and glorious moment in time...

10/10
Author: Son of Cathode from New England
7 March 2014

The Chicago 8 is a marvelous and exciting evocation of the vivid, often violent clash of cultures which defined America in the mid-1960s. The war in Vietnam, now widely seen as a territory & resource grab by the imperialist American war machine, was the tipping point for many intelligent people with compassion: this latest exercise in genocide-for-profit was just too much for some to idly accept, and they responded. Sadly, they encountered an extraordinarily corrupt and prejudiced court system, which ruthlessly targeted and punished any free-thinking citizen who questioned the bloodthirsty antics of the military-industrial complex and it's government hand-maiden.

The infamous trial – and its astute evocation in the film - acted as lightning rod for all of the accrued and overlapping socio-political dichotomies in U.S. culture at the time: old vs. young, white vs. black, Wasp vs. Jew, hawk vs. dove, square vs. hippie, conservative vs. liberal, etc. These warring dichotomies are conveyed well here, via the characters, the script, plus the excellent use of split-screen, which always pits one of more battling factions against each other in stark relief. The film is rife with amazing portrayals of colorful bigger-than-life characters, with those of Allen Ginsberg and Phil Ochs two stand-outs. The only thing I would wish for is more Mayim Bialik, the coolest Yippie Jewess ever depicted on-screen.

The Chicago 8 vividly depicts a glorious moment in time, when (some) young people had vision, passion and courage - not like the apolitical video-game, corporate-zombie, war-monger goof-balls which pass for youth today. In fact, it seems the only "epic fail" here is that of the dullard audience, who can't see artistic excellence staring them in the face. Pearls before swine, I say. Read the other reviews of this film to see how far the movie-going audience has sunken in the past twenty years; the most hilarious one even wishes for the world's wealthiest hack - Steven Spielberg - to remake the story himself! Good god, these people actually plead for slick corporate crap over heartfelt indie filmmaking - case closed!

Was the above review useful to you?

0 out of 2 people found the following review useful:

What a great movie! A must-see for anyone interested in civil liberties or US history

10/10
Author: Paul Nash from Toronto, ON
5 October 2013

What a great movie! Filmed in a style that echoes the times, it re-enacts a seminal court case (one that many have never heard of). This was not only an important event for my generation, but also has echoes in the current US.

If you have never heard of the "Chicago 8", you need to see this movie all the more.

Well acted and directed (though some of the multi-angle shots may be off putting). We're the script not taken from the court transcript, it might be considered a bit over-the-top, but it is delivered with panache and flair. Great direction and production.

Offers a useful antidote to sludge like "zero dark thirty"

Was the above review useful to you?


Add another review


Related Links

Plot summary Ratings Awards
Official site Main details Your user reviews
Your vote history