MOVIEmeter
SEE RANK
Up 15,114 this week

Kakraki (2009)

6.7
Your rating:
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 -/10 X  
Ratings: 6.7/10 from 129 users  
Reviews: 1 user | 1 critic

Add a Plot

Director:

Writer:

0Check in
0Share...

User Lists

Related lists from IMDb users

a list of 131 titles
created 14 Oct 2011
 
a list of 18 titles
created 20 Mar 2013
 
a list of 332 titles
created 4 months ago
 

Related Items

Search for "Kakraki" on Amazon.com

Connect with IMDb


Share this Rating

Title: Kakraki (2009)

Kakraki (2009) on IMDb 6.7/10

Want to share IMDb's rating on your own site? Use the HTML below.

Take The Quiz!

Test your knowledge of Kakraki.
Edit

Cast

Credited cast:
...
Mikhal Mikhalych
...
Elena Ivanovna
Olga Sun ...
Nastya
Sergey Koltakov ...
Vasilyev
Sergey Gazarov ...
Neighbor
Rest of cast listed alphabetically:
Aleksandr Bashirov ...
Krutikov
Vladimir Chuprikov ...
Driver Sergei
Tatyana Kravchenko
Dmitri Labush ...
Misha
Elena Safonova ...
Elena Vladimirovna
Aleksandr Samoylenko ...
Sergiyenko
Vladimir Skvortsov ...
Petrusha
Edit

Storyline

Add Full Plot | Add Synopsis

Genres:

Comedy | Drama

Edit

Details

Country:

Language:

Release Date:

15 October 2009 (Russia)  »

Also Known As:

Crawfishlike  »

Company Credits

Show detailed on  »

Technical Specs

Runtime:

Color:

See  »

Frequently Asked Questions

This FAQ is empty. Add the first question.

User Reviews

The Sad Side of Gogol
18 March 2011 | by (St.Julians) – See all my reviews

This movie hardly constitutes a cinematic masterpiece. Nonetheless as far as its script is concerned it seems to convey a pretty important message and do so in quite adequate a way.

The movie's protagonist is "il conformista". Throughout his entire life he has been complying to the requirements of his surroundings which bear all the indications of our modern globalized society, that is one which had long ago ceased to be comprised of citizens or simply human beings - they became consumers. Though this character clearly understands that it might be not exactly the right thing to do, he seems to be lacking an impetus that could push him to attempt to act in accordance with the way he feels. But then love comes along and provides a missing ingredient. Now he wants to actually change something.

Unfortunately, the protagonist's gust doesn't happen to be backed by his inner preparedness to start to apply to the process of existence any more exertion than he used to while he was conveniently choosing the path of least resistance. No support from outside can be expected either, because all this glossy ''animal farm'' which makes his surroundings are deeply engaged in rat race and very far from being exalted at the sight of his attempt to transform back into a human being. So his intention cannot be realized through such a spontaneous "rebellion" and thus is nothing more than just an unattainable illusion.

And as soon as he commits something that this system, which surrounds him, used to allow him to do while he was part of it and acted out of considerations that made his actions enhance this system, but out of other ones now - which, in fact, jeopardize this system's very foundations, he becomes its enemy and gets instantaneously destroyed by it. He had no life prior to this moment - and he perfectly understood that he was only imitating his existence - but had a dream. When now his castle in the sky encounters an absurd reality - that's why Gogol is repeatedly referenced here - and turns in his perception into the above-mentioned illusion, when it becomes clear that there will be no living his dream (I guess that would be the metaphorical meaning of the girl's "betrayal"), then he is left with absolutely nothing and can only disappear. Which the hero does.

Some time ago Paul Verhoeven made a seemingly unpretentious sci-fi action flick called "Total Recall". But according to the director himself his movie was supposed to pose no small questions. For instance

  • is it still possible in our modern world to successfully confront the


power of blind greed or is it nothing more than just a paranoid illusion nowadays? This movie asks broader ones: is it still possible to remain humans in a completely dehumanized society which made a quest for money and comfort at all costs its sole objective, and where everything, including life itself, is merely "consumed"? And can such a society be sustained at all? Back in 1990 Verhoeven provided his, trickily disguised by the movie's ostensible happy one, open ending - which gave some hope. Sadly, but judging by this movie's finale its author seems already to consider his questions simply rhetorical ones.


0 of 0 people found this review helpful.  Was this review helpful to you?

Message Boards

Discuss Kakraki (2009) on the IMDb message boards »

Contribute to This Page

Create a character page for:
?