Hyde Park on Hudson (2012) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
116 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
7/10
Beautiful but Half Baked
angiequidim7 December 2012
By Marie Cinquino www.thatsmye.com

On the surface, Hyde Park on Hudson is about Franklin D. Roosevelt (Bill Murray) and one of his mistresses, his far removed cousin Margaret Suckley (Laura Linney), who is our narrator. We are to assume that the New Deal is underway, and FDR is under much stress awaiting the visit of the King and Queen of England;it is the first time British Royalty have traveled to the United States to meet with American politicians. Margaret's company has been requested to help the President deal with his tension and to give him an excuse to get out of his office and relax. However, as the movie progresses, Margaret's presence and character becomes increasingly less important and interesting. Richard Nelson's writing feels unorganized, and quickly the relationship between FDR and King George VI (Samuel West) seems to become the focal point. As the characters develop and the drama unfolds, it becomes clear the only real constant theme here is the shedding of false ideas about others and the self.

I thought seeing Bill Murray as FDR would be distracting, but he was believable and lovable. The relationship he creates with King George VI was a display of the best writing and acting in the whole film. The two stay up late talking, sharing with one another what they feel is expected of them by their families, their countries, and themselves. They wind up drinking and comparing their physical imperfections, polio and stuttering. It seems to be a profound moment in which they become comfortable with one another, themselves, and the unity between their countries. From this point on, all of the relationships become more real and approachable. The King and Queen endure a sleepless night lighting one another's cigarettes, the President is shown to be an average man in many ways (although brilliant), and Margret's fantastic ideas about her place in the presidents life are boiled down to a much more realistic perspective.

Although some relationships between characters are enjoyable, the writing that takes us there is shaky. Margaret is introduced so strongly, and we are convinced she will play an important role, but she seems to disappear as soon as another plot point comes along. Her character seemed more of a cheap vessel to create momentum than an actual developed character. She becomes less interesting than every other character, and I end up wishing to see more of Eleanor Roosevelt (Olivia Williams) and the Queen (Olivia Colman). While the writing often feels loosely knit, the camera work is never disappointing. The scenery is beautiful and simple. It reflects these characters that are learning about themselves. It is bare bones and lovely.

Hyde Park on Hudson had its moments. I liked seeing King George VI eat hotdogs, the Queen smoke cigarettes, and FDR go swimming in a turn of the century bathing suit. However this film could have been so much better. It felt like Nelson forgot about his own plot. The gaps he left were huge and left me wondering why there were so many lose ends. The script needs to be beefed up and full cooked. There's still pink in this meat.
40 out of 55 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Bill Murray Carries His Latest Effort
LoveYourMovies25 December 2012
Bill Murray is a comedy LEGEND and an American favorite. Everyone just about has a favorite Bill Murray moment or movie. Whats not to like he has a style that is truly his own and a swagger that draws you despite not being the type that craves the labels. While always being a good actor it's only in the last 15 or so years that people have stood up and taken notice that he can act beyond his comedic roots. With a few roles several years ago that showed this such as Where The Buffalo Roam in which he portrayed Hunter S. Thompson and 1984's The Razor's Edge he primarily stuck with his comedic roots, and why not it had served him so well for so long. in 1998 he made Rushmore with visionary director Wes Anderson and suddenly he wasn't Carl Spackler or Dr. Peter Venkman anymore, he was an actor.

In 2004 he was honored with his first Academy Award nomination for his outstanding performance in Lost In Translation for which he was visibly disappointed that he was the recipient. 9 years later he just may be poised for his second Oscar nomination for his unbelievable portrayal of former president Franklin D. Roosevelt. A most unlikely choice on the film maker behalf, but one that will prove to be a proud choice. The film is Hyde Park On Hudson with whom he co-stars along side the always great Laura Linney.

The story is one of an affair the president had with an extremely distant cousin that carried on for years when he would retreat to Hyde Park, NY of which he was quite fond of doing much of his work from there. During the early stages of the affair a monumental occasion occurred when the new king of England became the first king to visit American soil in history. King George VI affectionately known as Bertie, who was recently portrayed by Academy Award winner Colin Firth in The Kings Speech, was very new to his position and felt it best to visit the US and the president to keep up relations. Over a weekend in Hyde Park the king and president formed a very special relationship that proved vital as WWII would shortly break out a few weeks later.

What is most intriguing was that you had to fine men in positions of great power that at the same time had great flaws, Bertie with his stutter and Roosevelt with his partial paralysis. The film has a fine moment when the two converse late one night and the president clearly seems to instill a great confidence in the king when they both realize many similarities in each other.

Over the same weekend the president's affair with his cousin, Daisy quickly becomes threatened and almost comes to a complete halt.

The film is a fine story and well told but it's not without rhythmic issues and has several slow moments. It is without question carried on the shoulders of Murray's performance. It's not a story that has you drawn in within seconds and has some difficulty keeping you there. It is though a good movie that deserves to be soon for Murray alone.

Murray shows the often unknown and unseen humorous side the president Roosevelt and does it with great perfection. His portrayal is one of the great performances of a historical figure in recent years. The one flaw in his award chances may be he happens to be against another fine actor playing an iconic president in Daniel Day-Lewis in Lincoln. It's a story every years where a deserving actor comes away empty handed because someone just happens to be on another level.

Murray's day will come at some point. His commitment to taking great roles and being someone different every time only proves that. Unfortunately we will have to wait a little longer. Loveyourmovies.com
20 out of 27 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
A pleasant period film, but devoid of conflict
Movie_Muse_Reviews15 January 2013
"Hyde Park on Hudson" might forever be known as that other film in 2012 featuring a U.S. president — if anyone remembers it at all. Both films are entirely different portrayals, namely in the scope of both the stories they tell and the span of time in which they take place, but only one of them is giddy over being a period piece, and it's not "Lincoln."

Taking in place in 1939 prior the U.S. committing to what would become World War II, "Hudson" is a film mostly content with being pretty, excited by putting actors in period clothes who pretend to be world leaders. None of these performances are bad, (quite the opposite in fact) but the little piece of history they're reenacting lacks any bit of import.

Bill Murray as Franklin Roosevelt isn't even the center of the film. Instead it's our narrator, Daisy (Laura Linney), FDR's distant cousin, whose diary and memoirs Richard Nelson used to craft the screenplay. She relays a story of romance, but one that's modest and presumed, occurring up to and during the arrival of King George VI and Queen Elizabeth from England to Hyde Park on Hudson, home of FDR's mother and his home away from Washington.

The film invests a lot in presenting FDR in such a casual manner, but this notion of candid access is hardly thrilling, either because the man has been dead for almost 70 years, or because it barely shows him in the context of being president — just a man who people treat with great respect and admiration who is surrounded by a lot of people all the time. Any American who studied the president in school knows about his polio and how he was able to keep the country oblivious to it with cooperation from the press, so that's hardly a hook either.

Murray is certainly an unusual but inspired choice. Playing a light-hearted and relaxed FDR makes sense for him, though if tested it would be wrong to doubt his capability to command attention in the role. The film doesn't seem too interested in digging into his psyche, just peeling back the curtain enough to show a man who longed for the affections of women and whose outlook and world view was different from other people in positions of power during his time.

Linney is such a wasted talent as the meek and naive Daisy. Although she narrates throughout, she disappears in stretches, even after the script establishes very clearly that this is her story. She doesn't factor into the conflict until late, and that's if you can consider it conflict. Normally, choosing not to embellish the details of an alleged affair in melodramatic Hollywood fashion would be worthy of much commendation, but the details of their relationship are so vague and the process by which Daisy comes to have feelings for FDR and vice-versa so ambiguous that you feel nothing toward either of them.

The arrival of King George VI (Samuel West) and Queen Elizabeth (Olivia Colman) in Hyde Park provides the film a pair of interesting characters and ultimately something to happen in what would otherwise be a purposeless portrait of a president and his sometimes-lover cousin. George has just assumed power after his brother abdicated the throne and they come to America desperate to forge a partnership between England and the U.S.

Therein could be the conflict at the heart of "Hudson," but the film maintains its light and often jocular tone instead, despite a footnote suggesting the events depicted were crucial to the special relationship between the countries. In essence, much stock is put into the symbol of King George biting into a hot dog.

"Hyde Park on Hudson" is a pleasant film, but it presumes to be interesting on the basis that it depicts famous political figures and exposes a beloved president's unflattering personal life. Maybe that's an exaggerated assumption of the film's intent, but it doesn't tell a story of any kind as far as plot structure goes. It's a great advertisement for a film audiences would prefer to see about who FDR really was, but in and of itself, it fails to offer any acute insight.

~Steven C

Thanks for reading! Visit moviemusereviews.com for more
24 out of 35 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Certain Flaws With Story but Performances Carry Film
Michael_Elliott15 January 2013
Hyde Park on Hudson (2012)

*** (out of 4)

With the King and Queen coming to America for the first time, FDR (Bill Murray) asks his fifth cousin (Laura Linney) to spend some time with him and soon the two become quite close in many ways. HYDE PARK ON HUDSON seems to be getting mostly mixed reviews and that's easy to see why. I think most people will agree that the performances are terrific but it seems like most people, myself included, are caught up with the story or lack of one if you will. What story that is here seems to be all over the place as the film never seems to fully know what it's about. Is it about the relationship between FDR and his cousin? Is it about all the dirty stuff FDR was doing? Is it just a slice-of-pie comedy? Is the main focus the upcoming war? Or is the main focus on whether or not the King will actually eat a hot dog? All of this stuff takes place here and as I said, none of it really gets the spotlight. The film remains very entertaining thanks in large part to the performances but one can't help but wonder what this film would have been like with a stronger, more focused story. With that said, Murray turns in another wonderful performance and I think the best thing that I can say is that when you watch the film you feel as if you're watching the real FDR. Not for a single second do you just see Murray and think of him as an actor doing a performance. Linney doesn't appear to be getting the credit she deserves but her quiet character contains some strong emotion thanks to the actress. Samuel West, Olivia Colman, Olivia Williams and Elizabeth Wilson are also extremely strong in their roles. Director Roger Michell perfectly nails the time as the look of the film is quite compelling and authentic. Another major plus is some great song selection scattered throughout the picture. HYDE PARK ON HUDSON isn't the grand slam many people were expecting but there's still enough here to make it worth viewing.
18 out of 24 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Tentative smiles of a summer night...
moonspinner5524 January 2016
In 1939, Margaret "Daisy" Suckley, fifth cousin to current US President Franklin D. Roosevelt, is summoned to visit FDR at his country estate in Hyde Park, NY. He initiates a sexual relationship with her--we're told he thrives on the adoring eyes of young women--which surprisingly does not complicate his state of affairs, the fact he's married, or that his mother is a constant factor in his life. Bill Murray plays Roosevelt with wry humor and an unpretentious lift of the chin; crippled at this point by polio, yet unselfconscious about using crutches or by being carried around by an assistant, this Commander in Chief is a steady, low-keyed man so lacking in drama he's almost easy to miss in a crowd. Written by Richard Nelson, ostensibly based upon Suckley's diaries (discovered posthumously), "Hyde Park on Hudson" is austere and tasteful, if pointless. The Roosevelts' lack of a grand showing when King George VI and Queen Elizabeth visit is faintly amusing (the Royals are initially perplexed or put-off by the mild reception, but come to love FDR for his unadorned hospitality). Lara Linney as Daisy has to grapple with her feelings for a man whose time (and intimacy) must be shared, and occasionally she's too much of a sad anchor on the narrative; still, Linney's underplaying is in tune with director Roger Michell's handling, and she manages to carve out a genuine character without a lot to work with. The film has lovely passages, but is so thin it has to use Daisy's sense of betrayal for narrative tension (which is useless since nothing much is done to satisfy her--or us). Samuel West is wonderful as the stammering King (who livens up an otherwise disastrous formal dinner) and Olivia Williams is a fine Eleanor. **1/2 from ****
4 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Rather bland but diverting; may as well have had Murray and Linney reading aloud from the diary.
george.schmidt16 December 2012
Warning: Spoilers
HYDE PARK ON HUDSON (2012) **1/2 Bill Murray, Laura Linney, Samuel West, Olivia Colman, Elizabeth Marvel, Olivia Williams, Elizabeth Wilson. Rather bland but diverting enough account of the affair of FDR (gamely played by Murray) and his distant cousin Margaret Stuckley (Linney very low-key and perhaps miscast) whose arrival to his enclave during the 1939 visit of the King and Queen of England (West and Colman) is the soft center that holds the picture on high in this otherwise negligible, forgettable historical biopic. While Roger Michell gives his actors plenty of room to work there's a listlessness to the tone and Richard Nelson's pedestrian script may as well have had Murray and Linney reading aloud from the diary.
6 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Mediocre costume drama that wanted to be so much more.
twilliams767 January 2013
Hyde Park on Hudson is a film that wishes to be seriously esteemed and respected as a minor historical film account of a momentous occasion; but it never gives its audience a serious reason to do so. It isn't a bad movie, it just never becomes the good one that it wants to be.

It (primarily) recounts the events of a weekend in June 1939 in upstate New York when the sitting -- this wasn't typed as a pun -- US president Franklin D. Roosevelt (Bill Murray -- Rushmore, Lost in Translation) welcomes the British King and Queen to his country estate. It was notable because a reigning British monarch had never visited America before and England was on the verge of war with Germany. Also in abundance at the estate -- meddling women ... be it mother, wife, secretary or mistress.

Laura Linney (Primal Fear, Kinsey) plays Daisy -- a distant cousin to FDR -- who is sent-for to help with FDR's wandering mind and calm him. Over time (the film spans more than a weekend), they become rather close and form another type of kinship. The story is told through Daisy which means we hear lots of narration and are given many snippets of time passing before the weekend (to see them develop a relationship -- which an audience never really does) until the monarchs arrive and it becomes ALL about the weekend.

There are plenty of decent moments in Hyde Park on Hudson including Murray as FDR and some wonderful shots of beautiful country landscapes. The film looks nice and the period detail will win some over; but the film fails to ever make a connection with Daisy. As the central character, the audience is given no real reason to want to follow her ... why is she really even here? I don't want to call her bland but the film gives us no reason to believe otherwise and absolutely no real reason as to why her and FDR forged their bond.

I appreciated the depictions of the King and Queen (this is the stuttering king Colin Firth won an Oscar for playing a few years ago and Olivia Colman is quite good as the uncomfortable queen) and their struggles with being in America such as their trying to fathom the "rage" about hot dogs.

Sadly, most of the rest of the film is empty -- like the Hyde Park estate would be when FDR returned to Washington. This should have been so much more ...
28 out of 48 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Sweet film
karl_consiglio27 June 2013
A rather sweet film. Not Bill Murray as we expect him. And yet I couldn't imagine anyone more suitable. Much ado about nothing really and men know that. Women worry too much. Two great flawed personalities as we all are. They have a drink. A smoke. A hot dog. Share a joke. While the women hassle about as usual. A lot of terrible things could have been avoided had there been more pleasant weekends like this. The presence of the American Indians made quite an impression. Because they got screwed more than the female Americans in this film at the end of the day. Funny to see a British King still telling his wife not to compare him to his brother while an American President is having his wife and lovers coming to terms with the fact that he has other lovers. Those pictures on the wall depicting the British as monkeys, as the characters in the film suggested, were indeed rather symbolically true at the end of the day although the Americans were supposedly supposed to be the less sophisticated.
3 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
What is the purpose?
FlushingCaps4 December 2013
Warning: Spoilers
Hyde Park on Hudson attempts to tell two stories concerning Franklin Roosevelt's visits to Hyde Park, where he shared a house with his mother, and had a separate cottage set up for visits with lady friends, and where he had as overnight guests in 1939, England's King George and Elizabeth, the Queen Consort.

Bill Murray does a fine job presenting a Roosevelt that was witty and clever, yet scheming and manipulative as well. Laura Linney as Daisy seems to be the real star, narrating and telling about her relationship with the President, who is a distant cousin. The film begins with her narrating how she was asked, out of the blue, to come see him—she lived nearby, and how he started showing her his stamp collection, then took her for car rides in his specially designed car that had hand controls for everything so FDR could drive himself.

They roar through the countryside. We see flowers and hills and, with the title being Hyde Park on Hudson, we look in vain for the Hudson River. It isn't there because the entire movie was filmed in England. I learn from other IMDb sources that the Roosevelt homes portrayed look nothing like the real life buildings either. That's O.K., Bill Murray didn't look too much like FDR anyhow.

After seeing a hint that Daisy's relationship was perhaps turning physical with the president, the storyline leaves this to focus on the visit, four years after Daisy started meeting with her cousin, of the royal couple of the United Kingdom.

In real life, they met the president in Washington and journeyed with him to Hyde Park, where they stayed overnight and tried to get him to commit to helping Britain in the coming war. Of course, the president committed to nothing, and Europe was at war for well over 2 years before we joined. One wonders, had our presidential elections been in 1938 and 1942, if Roosevelt would have gotten us involved shortly after the 1939 invasion of Poland. His reelection of 1940 was surely the main reason why he wasn't about to get us into a war right before that happened.

In the film, the royal couple provide many of the small laughs, as they discuss differences in American and English customs, particularly the planned menu of hot dogs at the picnic. Elizabeth seemed so aghast at this delicacy, you would think she believe they were actually made of dog meat. They see FDR with another of his mistresses, outside the house from their upstairs window, and they just smile and wave.

At the "picnic" we see Murray carried across the grounds to his table, which is, more or less, on the porch, not the grass. My trouble here was that this was in full view of well over a hundred people at tables spread all across the lawn. I know he was carried to places at times, but my understanding was that whenever there were people around who weren't in his inner circle, he arranged to avoid having them see that he needed to be carried like a small boy.

Because he had learned Daisy was offended at not being invited to the big dinner the night before, he made sure to invite her to sit right beside him at the picnic. The film even shows Daisy putting mustard on the king's hot dog. I have learned that in real life, she couldn't have put the mustard on for the king because she was sitting two tables away from them.

The film definitely picked up when the royal guests arrive. Before that, we had the tedious scenes of FDR showing his stamps to Daisy and chatting about nothing as he drove her around. I thought the first 25 minutes or so were quite boring.

But since the scenes with the royal couple were not at all close to reality, and nothing was really accomplished other than the vague renewal of friendship between the two nations, I cannot see why this film was made.

From various sources, the portrayal of King George and Elizabeth was not very close to their personalities in any way. The king was just 13 years younger than our president, yet FDR kept treating him as though he were old enough to be his father. It seemed like a ploy to make it seem like it was our president whose wise counsel enabled King George to be bold enough to achieve all that he did in his reign as king.

The entire Daisy story was an utter bore. Apparently the diaries she left behind, published as a book and studied by historians, do not claim any kind of sexual relationship with FDR, as is suggested by the film. Her character in the film is totally uninteresting. We learn nothing about her life away from her visits with the president, other than that she lives with an aunt and takes care of her. Her big dramatic scene comes when she learns that the president has, at least one, other mistress. We are given to feel sorry for her because she feels hurt to learn that the married man with whom she is having an affair, has another woman he's seeing? Critics claim the movie's two stories made it unfocused. I agree. We saw no political maneuvering of FDR, no dealing with his work while at Hyde Park. We got no glimpses of his plans for reelection, or what he thought needed to happen for us to become involved in the war. If we weren't to learn about real historical events, and weren't really seeing characters portrayed realistically, what was the point?
8 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
One great scene
richard-178715 January 2013
In general, this movie was a disappointment for me. After reading reviews, I expected something much more interesting. The story of FDR's relationship with his distant cousin did not hold me. (And no, I don't care to watch someone jack off the president of the United States.) Bill Murray made FDR very human, and I appreciated that - though I have no idea how historic that was.

For me, the one great scene was the one after dinner between FDR and King George, when George lets ago in anger because of his stutter and FDR looks at him with a straight face and says, "Yes, and damn my polio." Suddenly there is a bond between the two men, both of whom had their crosses to bear, and from there on to the end of that scene, I was completely caught up.

Would that the rest of the movie had been that good. For me, it wasn't. The acting was all fine, but the script simply didn't hold my interest.
3 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Wow. I was bored
gaelmarconi1225 May 2013
I really wanted to see this film and rented it to watch at home.

Story is slow and when you're expecting something to happen, it doesn't.

Totally disappointed in this movie. I always enjoyed Laura Linny and Bill Murray and this film had a sort of Altman feel to it but it just dragged.

I found myself hitting the fast forward button in some scenes.

Additionally, I knew FDR was a philanderer but this story really depicts him as a multiple woman Lothario. Lost even more respect for FDR.

Olivia Williams does a good job portraying Elenor. I guess Elenor wasn't the best host in her time.

Good cast but the story and direction is a downer.
12 out of 20 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Wonderful Performance By Bill Murray
georgep5326 December 2012
I don't get all the negativity directed at this film. I thought it was charming and witty. History is rarely so much fun.

The story is simple enough. On the eve of World War II King George VI and his wife journey to the US to see President Roosevelt at his family's Hyde Park retreat hoping to secure American support against Nazi Germany. The FDR we see here isn't the Great Depression/war leader he's a weary man battling polio and trying to find solace in relationships with a distant cousin among others.

Bill Murray gives an amazing performance humanizing the 32nd president an avid stamp collector who during this period when another European war appeared inevitable was more likely to find himself seeking peaceful coexistence between his dominating mother and estranged wife, Eleanor. Laura Linney is Margaret Suckley an unassuming, humble cousin who becomes a regular visitor to the retreat at the time of the royal visit. Samuel West and Olivia Colman are a convincing King and Queen making the first visit in history to the US by a British monarch. I found "Hyde Park On the Hudson" a delightful little film and the 95 minutes flew by leaving me wishing for more.
57 out of 64 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Funny movie
lolo-h3 May 2013
This film has a crazy story , but I think that the story was not true.Because president Roosevelt ,who is played by Bill Murray , has an affair with his cousin,and it crazy .

The actors who play the KIng and the Queen are good actors .

In this movie there are plenty of unexpected events and very humorous ones,

like the moment when king George VI eats a hot- dog.And also there are very strong moment ,like the moment when president Roosevelt and the king speak about their problem.

I found that "Hyde park on Hudson" is a beautiful and crazy movie . I've spend a good moment.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Slow with a severe lack of plot, but beautifully shot with superb characterization.
TinyDanseur2721 June 2013
Warning: Spoilers
I had high hopes for Hyde Park on Hudson. I love bio-flicks, especially when British royalty are involved. I was somewhat disappointed with this film though. Despite its short run time of an hour and thirty minutes, it maintained an incredibly slow pace. I kept wondering when something exciting or dramatic would happen, but for the majority of the movie it was just meaningful looks, unexcited dialogue, and artistic shots of the landscape or details of the house.

I was not expecting the depiction of FDR as a serial adulterer. Perhaps I need to brush up on my U.S. history, but my view of FDR as this humble savior of our country during a time of extreme hardship was dashed to pieces. What replaced it was this view that he was a rather self-centered man, neglectful of his marriage and insensitive to how his actions affected those around him. I suppose the reality is that he lies somewhere in between those two extremes. Never-the-less, Hyde Park on Hudson threw me for a loop.

I suppose what the movie lacked in plot it made up for in character development. I felt that the movie was excellently cast. Each actor played their role with both sophistication and overt characterization. Particularly enjoyable for me were the performances by Olivia Williams as the brassy Eleanor Roosevelt, Samuel West as a very likable George VI, and Olivia Colman as Elizabeth, his wife.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
might just as well have been titled "What happens at Hyde Park Stays at Hyde Park."
The_Film_Cricket7 December 2012
Hyde Park on Hudson might just as well have been titled "What happens at Hyde Park Stays at Hyde Park." We'd be glad if it did because, based on this movie, nothing of any real interest really happened there despite the presence of FDR, Eleanor, and The King and Queen of England. Here we have four of the most fascinating people of the 20th century in the same place at a time when storm clouds of Nazi aggression were about to burst and the screenplay focuses on FDR's infidelity and the Queen's concern over a picnic where she will be forced to eat hot dogs.

The movie takes place in the summer of 1939, when Franklin Roosevelt (Bill Murray) was spending some time at his country estate at Hyde Park. The movie deals with two events that took place that summer. First was FDR's intimate relationship with Margaret "Daisy" Stuckley (Laura Linney), his sixth cousin, who would become his mistress. The details of their relationship take place in long shots and quiet passages of dialogue that seem muted as if they simply don't have anything to say to one another. The heat in their attraction comes from their mutual admiration over – get this – his stamp collection. How he used this as an aphrodisiac to attract women is a question the movie doesn't really know how to answer, all you can deduce is that intimacy that grows out of admiration over stamps is about as exciting as it sounds.

The other story deals with a visit to Hyde Park by King George VI (Samuel West) and Queen Elizabeth (Olivia Coleman). No British monarch had ever visited America before. They are the pillars of England at a moment when Hitler is about to steamroll over much of Europe, and his Majesty has come west to speak with The President about an alliance that would overthrow the Fuehrer. Yet the movie leaves that important issue around the edges of the movie. Except for one effective scene between The President and The King, in which they both understand that they have physical ailments that they are trying to hide (one is disabled by polio, and the other has a stuttering problem), the movie has no real interest in their relationship. It is understood that America came to Britain's aid and the story of the king and queen is mostly concentrated on their puzzlement with brutish American customs, not just the aforementioned hot dogs, but the picnic and the Native American dancers that will be performing therein.

The story of the king and queen doesn't work because it doesn't move beyond their initial shock over American customs. The story of FDR's infidelity doesn't work because we simply don't care. Part of the problem is Daisy herself. She is our point of view in the film but she's such a blank slate that we have no foothold in her story. Laura Linney is a fine actress but she stands at a distance from FDR, admiring him but hardly saying a word except in narration. That narration, by the way, is so lazy, quiet and tired that it comes off like a particularly dull audio book. Roosevelt's relationship with Eleanor is nearly non-existence. It is known that after The President's relationship with is secretary two decades earlier, she had chosen to be his wife in name only, but where is the tension between them. Olivia Williams occupies the role of Eleanor not as a supporting character but almost as a fixture of the set.

To be fair, the performance by Bill Murray isn't bad. He is an unusual choice for this role and it is good to see him take such a risk, but you never feel that you're in the presence of the 32nd President. Murray is a good actor and he captures some of FDR's wit but he doesn't have the towering presence that made him such an American icon. This is a tiny movie, a meager effort that looks great but doesn't really go anywhere. You don't learn anything and there is no sense that you are getting a behind-the-curtain look at anything but really pretty pictures.

** (of four)
44 out of 70 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
A good movie but not what I expected. Murray is good but this is more love story then I expected. Worth seeing. I say B
cosmo_tiger11 February 2013
"In a time not so very long ago when the world still allowed itself secrets, Frankiln Roosevelt was mine." In 1939 Franklin Roosevelt (Murray) was president and his home away from home is Hyde Park, New York. While he is there he looks for company and finds it in his distant cousin Daisy (Linney). Trying to mend relations with England he invites King George VI to Hyde Park for a meeting. This is the true story of that visit. As many of you know I am a huge history buff and political history mostly. I was looking forward to this movie for those reasons and also for Bill Murray. This was a good movie but not really what I expected at all. The movie does deal with the visit but it's mostly a love story between FDR and Daisy. Bill Murray does do a very good job in this but I think the most interesting character was King George. This is a movie worth seeing but be prepared for more of a love story then a historical one. Overall, good but not what I expected. I give it a B.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Better Than It Appears
JackCerf16 August 2015
You have to get past two things in this movie. First, although the historians say that the movie took too much dramatic license, the intimacies of FDR's relationship with his distant cousin Daisy Suckely don't really matter. Second, the movie is predominantly about FDR's relationship with the women closest to him -- his highly political wife, Eleanor, his loyal, adoring secretary, Missy LeHand, his adoring and domineering mother, and the safe, quiet, likewise adoring Daisy. Bill Murray, as FDR, floats through a sea of estrogen, sometimes doing an effortless backstroke, sometimes barely keeping his head above the storm waves. Except for two tete a tete meetings with the young King George VI, there is not one scene in which the President of the United States is shown saying anything of substance to another man. That's not surprising, because the principal source for the story is the letters and journal that Daisy kept secret until after her death at age 99. With one major exception, it's all her point of view.

The reason to watch is Bill Murray's marvelous FDR. He looks nothing like the man, of course, but he perfectly captures the FDR manner of insouciance, amiability and insincerity masking unshakable determination. Its a technical performance on a level with Cate Blanchett's impersonation of Katherine Hepburn in The Aviator.

The high point is the two private meetings between FDR and George VI, which Daisy could have known of only at second hand from FDR, if at all. The young king is shown as not only uncertain of himself but somewhat overwhelmed by his queen, who is herself insecure but with a much stronger will. The tone, set by Murray's FDR, is of the two men finally getting some peace and quiet away from female demands and importunities. He uses his mobility, or rather his lack of it, to make a point about will and determination to a younger man suffering from his own disability. I know this is historical fiction, but if this isn't the way it was, it's nice to think so.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
21st Century Tabloid Biopic Misses Badly
kassandrasduplex9 January 2013
If you don't mind seeing the American president whose March of Dimes led to the eradication of polio, who led the country successfully through the Great Depression (no revolution occurred) gave countless Americans decent secure old age retirement with the Social Security pension, and along the way happened to help conquer Nazi fascism and Japanese imperialism, portrayed as a chain-smoking alcoholic predatory lecherous sexual creep, who , by the way, receives a hand-job from his cousin Margaret Suckley (pronounced like book-lee) very early in the film, then you'll enjoy this hit piece from a Yale Man author, Richard Nelson. Never mind FDR was paralyzed from the waist down and likely could not manage an erection. Never mind the fact that Daisy Suckley's own first source diary and letters never mentions a hand-job or any kind of sexual relationship with the President, we are treated to entire fabrications of dialog and actions, in what can charitably be described as a character assassination of FDR. The only questions this viewer came away with after walking out 60 minutes into the film were, why would such a talented man as Bill MJurray lend his name to this trash, and why does the popular mainstream media seem these days absolutely unable to give FDR his credit and due? This hit piece is something Dinesh D'Souza could have cranked out. We know one fact about FDR's sexual life, he had an admitted affair with Lucy Mercer Rutherford which began long before his presidency and polio, and which friendship lasted to his death. We have absolutely no proof FDR had any sexual relations with any other woman, aside from his wife and Mercer Rutherford, and how sad that we live in an age where the memory of this president has been reduced to such garbage. A film about how FDR vanquished the paralyzing effects of polio to go on to the presidency, or his troubled yet politically tremendous relationship with Eleanor, or the inner workings behind the creation of Social Security, these could have been momentous stories, which the talented Bill Murray could have pulled off better than most. The question remains, "Why this character assassination, why now?"
12 out of 24 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Presidential endeavours
Prismark1011 December 2013
Hyde Park on Hudson is actually a light frothy film but never delivers in its intent and purpose. It's whimsical but lacking in core and even heart.

Laura Linney is Daisy; a distant cousin to FDR who is sent to help with FDR's wandering mind and calm him.

Daisy accompanies on his drives to the country and keeps him company before FDR takes more carnal pleasures from her and she is willing to give it.

Although Daisy narrates the story, she is not the prime focus and it becomes clear that FDR has dallied with other ladies.

The film then changes track and deals with the events of the first Royal visit to the USA of King George V1 and Queen Elizabeth whose main purpose was to gather support for the impending war in Europe.

There seems to be apprehension and discomfort from both sides as to how to behave and the welcome they will get. FDR's mother is supportive of the Royal family, his wife seems to be distant and FDR kind of caught in the middle.

There is a culture clash with the King and Queen bemused with the looming picnic and the serving of Hot Dogs which is kind of the metaphor of this film. Why the King never asked anyone what Hot Dogs were or whether they were going to eat literal dogs highlights the films failings.

The performances of Bill Murray as FDR and Laura Linney is good but it sidelined some of the more interesting characters that we would like to see more from such as Eleanor Roosevelt.

A film that does not always make its intentions clear just like FDR and Daisy.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Hide from Hyde
Quietb-17 December 2012
Warning: Spoilers
Bill Murray adds a certain charm as FDR and will get Golden Globe attention.

Some good moments, but at 96 minutes it's too long and redundant. Scenes drag like the King and Queen of England debating the insulting cartoons on the wall of their room and the meaning of Hot Dogs. When one crash of dishes is effective, try two. Then there are things we would like more of like FDR bonding with Bertie, rather then hear about it as he tells the queen. Much of the important action is told and not shown.

It's Laura Linny's movie from point of view and voice over. In one great moment she expresses her true feelings, (but it doesn't really happen).

The movie looks good with excellent cinematography, Art Direction and Set Design.

FDR is portrayed as an unlikable alcoholic womanizer. You don't care about him or the woman that surround him. With so many Holiday movie options, pass on this one.
12 out of 25 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Enjoyable
johnmcc15014 February 2013
It felt about two hours shorter than "Lincoln" and on these grounds alone deserves a higher rating though "Lincoln" got its 7 from me for acting. The film, although bracketed by some history before and a little more after, it is mainly about a fairly small incident, the visit to the USA of the parents of the present Queen. At times it was almost "The King's Speech 2" and so it was more about them than FDR. You had to compare Samuel West with Colin Firth (not quite as convincing) and Olivia Colman with Helena Bonham-Carter (too toothy). Some of the royal scenes didn't quite work, eg the regal waves at a farm worker. Apparently hundreds of people lined the highway between New York and Hyde Park to see the King and Queen go by. I am also sure than QE would not have compared KG unfavourably with his brother and would not have reprimanded him over his stammer. Perhaps its attempts at comedy mixed its objectives. I can't remember seeing any dates, and this would have helped. The royal visit was June 1939 and so war really was imminent and the visit essential for the British. Having said that, it was an enjoyable though slight film.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Empty project
christophe9230027 April 2013
Hyde Park On Hudson relies on two story lines that absolutely don't work, namely Roosevelt's secret life oozing naivety in its development, and the meeting between him and King George VI (the stutterer from The King's Speech) that doesn't live up to the expectations.

The scenario navigates between these two lines without looking to deepen one or the other, which entails a flagrant superficiality. The dialogues are boring and totally insipid, the constant voice-over from start to finish is unbearable and only brings heaviness, and more generally the cinematography as a whole is wobbly and hesitant.

There is not much positive to this movie, even Bill Murray seems unconvinced and does the bare minimum. How producers believed in such an empty and uninteresting project is beyond reason.
4 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Franklin Delano Murray.
dfranzen7031 December 2012
Hyde Park on Hudson is no mixed bag, as some may have you think. Bill Murray turns in a perfectly mannered, whimsical performance as FDR and is very ably supported by an award-worthy cast that includes Laura Linney and Olivia Williams. It's funny, yes, but it's not a laugh riot, nor is it meant to be. It's a postcard look at a lost time, the first visit of an English monarch to a sitting U.S. president, dappled with a touch of uncertain, unlikely, and illicit romance.

It's a few years before The Big One, WWII, but there's a storm a-brewing in Europe. Everyone knows it, but relations between the U.S. and England have been strained, something about revolting and then fighting in the War of 1812. Ancient history to some but not all, it would seem. At any rate, King George VI and Queen Consort Elizabeth (Samuel West and Olivia Coleman, respectively) travel to America to visit Roosevelt with the intention of securing his support for the upcoming war. But rather than host them in stuffy Washington, DC, FDR (contrary to the real visit) invites his royal guests to his home away from home, Springwood, a stately manor in upstate New York. It happens to be on the Hudson River, or near it, in case the title has tripped you up.

Now, FDR was quite an unusual president. He was the last to serve more than two terms, as the Constitution was amended later. Also, he had polio, which he had contracted as a child. The funny thing is this - people went to great lengths to pretend nothing was wrong with Roosevelt's legs whatsoever. The Emperor had no clothes. Even the press were complicit, gamely waiting for the president to be lowered into the back of a convertible before taking their pictures and asking their questions. Can you imagine that today? The slightest limp by a leader seems to imply a lack of leadership in the minds of some.

And so it was at the time, only not. The nation turned its eyes to Roosevelt as a resolute, optimistic leader, a man who could help them finally rid themselves of that awful Depression, and so they gladly ignore whatever shortcomings he may have. The king of England, meanwhile, is in a similar situation. He is the same George depicted in The King's Speech - you know, the one about the king who stuttered? FDR, who is much older, is not as self conscious about his malady as he used to be, whereas poor George is practically frozen by his own. Now, recall that the king and queen are visiting to gain the support of America; FDR already knows this. He could easily just issue a statement to the effect that the USA would help England in any way it could, but he chooses to host royalty instead. He wishes to meet the man beneath the crown, and he wishes to size him up.

Enter into the fray a quite-distant cousin of FDR, a Daisy Stuckley (Linney), who narrates the story. Daisy is introduced to the president, and somehow they find a connection. Daisy, like the arriving king, is also unsure of herself, a bit of an ugly duckling among the glamor of the president's residence. They find in each other a kindred spirit. Franklin is more or less estranged from his saintly wife Eleanor at this point (they live in separate houses in New York!), and although he cannot walk, he does enjoy him some female company.

But what is this story really about, anyway? It depends on your own perspective. Some will see this as a docudrama reflecting the meeting of two leaders (and their wives); some will see it as a comedy, an intelligent, subtle comedy with a barely smirking Bill Murray. Others still will find romance in almost every scene, no matter who the players, no matter where the setting.

Murray deserves an Oscar nomination here, and perhaps the Academy will make up for their Lost in Translation snub. Linney does as well; her Daisy never undergoes a sudden transformation into a woman with a real backbone. She seems sad much of the time, working in the White House with tightened lips. Her life appears joyless; that is, until she has some alone time with Franklin, whence a window to a sunnier day slowly opens.

Hyde Park on Hudson is a gorgeous movie with a splendid, bemused, and convincing performance by Bill Murray as our 32nd president and endearing, exhilarating role for Laura Linney. Each should be richly rewarded come award time.
73 out of 87 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Powerful men always surrounded by sensational women.
mark.waltz24 December 2020
Warning: Spoilers
For FDR, it was more than just his wife Eleanor. There was his mother, and there was a special friend named Daisy. For King George VI, there was a regal, somewhat shy, but intelligent queen. When they get together at the home of the elder Mrs. Roosevelt, the two men ponder the fate of their governments as a war involving many countries looms, and the women all go their separate ways with the first lady and the first mother not quite friends and Daisy, the special friend, forced off to the side with Queen consort Elizabeth out of her element among American bluntness yet completely graceful when confronted by it.

A sensational ensemble lead by Bill Murray as FDR fleshes out all of these real life people who had a say in the destiny of freedom only 80 years ago. Laura Linney is something special as Daisy, slowly becoming the confidante to the president as a result of his loveless marriage where the wife (Olivia Williams) kept busy in other ways to distract herself from the unhappiness there as well as the presence of mother-in-law (Elizabeth Wilson), every inch the power broker of the family like Rose Kennedy would be of hers. Linney feels the guilt of being the other women and sadly stands on the sidelines, but there's no way she's leaving that position.

In contrast to the Americans, there's King George, aka Bertie (Samuel West), already documented in "The King's Speech", happy with the devoted Elizabeth (Olivia Coleman, who really resembles the queen's then 13 year old daughter as she would look as a young adult), and both feel out of place with the lack of formalities in American society. Elizabeth even questions the name Hyde Park as being the name of a park in London, while George expresses his insecurities over leading due to his stutter. FDR really knows how to speak to him, and it's two allies coming together when the world really needed allies.

This not only deals with the differences in two uppercrust societies but ideals shared in common with two different countries where the results are very crucial, and how women on the sidelines were often more involved than the public realized. The mixture of history, romance and light comedy (West exploding about the possibility of the King of England eating a hotdog) really works here, and there are plenty of pathos. I love the greenery of the location shoot (England ironically, not the northern Hudson Valley) and the quiet way the story is developed. This truly is a special film and one Murray will be highly remembered and regarded for.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Hyde Park On Hudson: Hide From This Film
rtp42427 September 2013
Warning: Spoilers
In 1939,Franklin Delano Roosevelt (Bill Murray) prepares to host the British King George (Samuel West) and his wife Elizabeth (Olivia Colman) to Hyde Park for a mini summit about the state of the world in wartime. Edward wants the US to help England and join the war, FDR has many isolationists that he must convince in America, before he can get involved in WW II. FDR invites his fifth cousin Daisy (Laura Linney) to join him in Hyde Park, and soon they are constant companions. Is there more to their relationship than meets the eye? Does Edward convince FDR that entering WWII is a worthwhile pursuit?

I did not like Hyde Park on Hudson at all. This movie only seems intent on defaming FDR, as a serial philanderer, and feckless husband who has to deal not only with an overbearing wife, but also an overbearing mother as well. Roosevelt happens to be a political hero of mine for many reasons. He won WWII as Commander in Chief, got the economy out of the Great Depression, and did all this while suffering from polio, which he had to hide from the press and public. Social Security, a cornerstone of Roosevelt's New Deal, is still with us today. Like him or not, he fundamentally changed America, and he doesn't deserve that tabloid hatchet job that this movie turns out to be. Whatever they do to FDR, they treat Eleanor even worse. The movie makers treat Mrs. Roosevelt with disdain because she wanted to be inclusive of people who had been left out of the political process, and because she is a strong-minded independent woman with opinions of her own. She should be lauded for her outspokenness and inclusiveness, not condemned for it. The trailer made it seem like the movie would be a light-hearted comedic film about a meeting between the king and President, it was anything but, the characters are anything but likable and the movie on the whole left me with a bad taste in my mouth.

The acting is horrendous. I like Bill Murray, in both his dramatic and comedic roles, but Roosevelt had an upstate New York patriarchal voice, and whatever Murray was trying to do with his voice, it didn't work, and proved to be more of a distraction than anything else. Olivia Williams, who plays Eleanor is a Brit, and her accent seeped through her delivery a couple of times. So there was the battle of the accents, Murray trying to put one on, Williams trying to take one off, it was troublesome. Samuel West brings some much needed levity to the proceedings, but really overemphasizes the stuttering. See The King's Speech if you want to see the definitive movie about King George. Olivia Colman plays Elizabeth as a relentless nag, and that gets old fast. Laura Linney plays Daisy as a doormat, a wet dishrag that doesn't inspire much interest.

The direction yields a few interesting shots of FDR and Daisy in the countryside, among the wildflowers, but overall the pacing is slow and ponderous.

Hyde Park On Hudson: The only thing you have to fear is…watching this film.

For more reviews with nothing to hide, visit my blog, reviewswithatude.wordpress.com.
8 out of 16 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed