| Page 1 of 11: | [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] |
| Index | 108 reviews in total |
65 out of 88 people found the following review useful:
A decent thriller that was advertised wrong, 9 November 2011
![]()
Author:
Nysa11 from United States
The previews and commercials for Dream House led one to believe it was a horror film, it is not, not at all. I think that is where a lot of the disappointment is coming from. It is a pretty good thriller, once you get used to the fact that that is what you are watching. The storyline, basically that horrible things have happened and we the audience have to figure it out along with the main character, is not the tired thriller standard, or at least the details are different enough to not seem tired. It's actually intriguing and the answer to the mystery is not obvious miles out, even if the climax sort of is. The acting is really quite good too. People who like mystery thrillers should enjoy the film, fans of scary movies will mostly not like it.
127 out of 223 people found the following review useful:
Daniel Craig and Rachel Weisz have a great chemistry together, too bad they wasted their efforts on this movie., 4 July 2011
![]()
Author:
grandbucket
Generic and predicable thriller made somewhat bearable by the
undeniable chemistry and acting chops between Daniel Craig and Rachel
Weisz, even though both actors involved deserved better than what they
were giving with the material. Daniel Craig and Rachel Weisz work very
well together on screen ( and supposedly in real life as well) but they
should have waited for a better film to showcase their chemistry and
acting chops then this film, which not only does not respect their
efforts in trying to bring humanity and credibility to a badly written
script but does not even try to at least capitalize on their efforts in
bringing more to the movie. Instead, the movie goes into several
different unnecessary directions that goes no where and drags this film
down. Naomi Watts is good as well but i just did not think much about
her character and found her an unnecessary, forced inclusion to the
story that ruins the film by making it even more predictable than it
already is. The film also feels like it was two separate movies before
it became one. Its a ghost story then it moves into a mystery with out
it making much sense, not to mention the fact of how predicable the
whole structure is. Let's just say that you have in fact seen this
story before.
Its alright for what it is but it could have been much more, especially
with two great actors (Weisz and Craig) having great acting chemistry
on screen.
50 out of 86 people found the following review useful:
The shame is not in the copycat techniques but rather in the failure to exploit the stolen ideas to the fullest extent., 30 September 2011
Author:
GoneWithTheTwins from www.GoneWithTheTwins.com
Dream House had plenty of potential with its story, despite the fact
that it's completely derivative of two other movies. Revealing those
films would spoil the surprise, as they are both popular and
well-received by audiences and critics alike. The shame is not in the
copycat techniques but rather in the failure to exploit the stolen
ideas to the fullest extent. Dream House fuses the plots cleverly, but
fizzles when the first big reveal can be guessed 45 minutes in (if not
sooner) and is then purposely betrayed at the one hour mark so that
audiences can ponder and digest the not-so-shocking revelation.
Will Atenton (Daniel Craig) has finally decided to quit his job as an
editor at GPH Publishers to spend more time with his wife Libby (Rachel
Weisz) and kids (Taylor and Claire Geare) and to start writing a book.
He moves to a large house in rural Fairfield County, which holds a dark
history. In his new home, undisclosed by his realtor, a father brutally
murdered his wife and kids. Will eventually learns that the unhinged
man, Peter Ward, spent five years in a psychiatric ward and was then
released to a halfway house nearby.
Will's children aren't too fond of the considerable dwelling,
especially when they see a mysterious man watching them through the
window. Fresh footprints in the snow support their sighting, and Will
is repeatedly awoken by bumps in the night. The neighbor across from
him, Ann Patterson (Naomi Watts), knows something of Ward's
incarceration, but refuses to divulge information. Everyone in the town
seems rather tight-lipped about the deadly incident, and Will takes it
upon himself to get to the bottom of it. When someone continues to
harass his family by stalking the house, he visits Ward's institution
to uncover some startling evidence.
An accomplished, celebrated cast of characters gives Dream House a
higher quality (than its B-movie origins) and greater promise. Some
will say they're wasted on this script, but it's not as dismal as that.
Unfortunately, it's the kind of storyline that needs polishing, a few
more solid thrills, and smarter twists or at least more intelligent
psychological zigzags. The serene music compliments the sense of
foreboding that steadily creeps into the picture, along with the savvy
use of mirrors, reflections, general mise en scene, and shuddersome
environment (namely the hallway and basement). Most of it is gimmicky
but effective. But as with any mystery, the solution is the most
crucial aspect it's the one element that proves most memorable and
determines whether or not the film will be recognized as unique. If a
whodunit concedes a letdown, even its high points are unlikely to be
forgiven.
- The Massie Twins (GoneWithTheTwins.com)
29 out of 46 people found the following review useful:
A bit confused but good after all, 19 October 2011
![]()
Author:
valadas from Portugal
This begins to look like the story of a successful publisher that decides to quit his job and retire to the house of his dreams to live there peacefully with his wife and children. But the story gets complicated while it develops itself and the dream house soon becomes a nightmare one after husband and wife know that terrible murders had taken place there five years before and strange events still related to it are still happening there and scaring them. But from then on the story loses itself in a lot of loose ends making it very confusing although most of them get tied up in the end in a somewhat fanciful outcome. After a certain time we understand that the story mixes up reality and imagination or even dream. The end of the movie may be considered an open ending, happy or unhappy according to the viewer's interpretation of the surprising final scene. The acting is good, the thrilling scenes are good enough and the plot confusion doesn't spoil the movie whole after all.
35 out of 58 people found the following review useful:
Once again, "Studio Heads" ruin the Artist's Work, 2 October 2011
![]()
Author:
intoArt-n-Film from United States
I went to see this film with great expectations as I'm a great fan of
Sheridan's body of work and also happen to enjoy Psychological
Suspense/Horror films (NOT slasher film trash). So I was really quite
disappointed with this effort by a team that seemed to have so much
potential.
But now it all makes sense to learn that the final effort was yanked
away from Sheridan; which has resulted in a homogenized and generic
thriller made up of (and the result of) idiotic random
behind-the-scenes "creative decision making" by Test Audiences(?) and
less-than-passionate-about-the-story/genre Studio Heads whose primary
involvement was solely in getting a "Horror/Thriller" into theaters by
October in order to cash in on the Halloween audience.
Seeing this happen again and again, I doubt they will ever learn. This
is the only industry in the world where one (as a Producer) can "fail
upward" just because you got something (anything) produced (in the
can).
As a final note: There was a fantastic Spec Script floating around a
couple of years ago with nearly the same title... "The Dream House." It
was somewhat similar, as it involved an Architect & his family who
rehab & remodel an abandoned mansion by a lake; but THAT script was a
truly terrifying Horror/Ghost Story along the same lines as Shirley
Jackson & Robert Wise's quintessential B&W Horror Classic "The
Haunting."
With this Dream House turning out to be such a dud and a nightmare,
hopefully that spec script will resurface in the near future to make up
for this failed effort.
47 out of 83 people found the following review useful:
This Sheridan Thriller is for the Thinking Viewer, 25 September 2011
Author:
changmoh from Malaysia
Editor and author Will Atenton (Daniel Craig) quits a high power job in
Manhattan to relocate with his wife, Libby (Rachel Weisz), and two
girls to a quaint New England town. However, as they settle into their
new life, they discover that their house was the murder scene of a
mother and her two children. Will tries to befriend his neighbour Ann
Patterson (Naomi Watts) and find out from her what happened but she is
not too eager to talk.
Meanwhile, Will's younger daughter starts seeing someone lurking
outside the window at night. As Will pieces together the haunting
puzzle, he must find out who murdered the family in his dream house
before the culprit returns to kill again.
"Dream House" is not a suspense thriller that will jolt you with sudden
loud music and cheap scares. Instead, it plays games with your mind,
keeping you guessing about what's happening and making you sort out the
plot yourself. Now, if you like your thrillers done this way, then go
for it. If not, this one is going to be a nightmare...
Director Jim Sheridan's plot build-up is almost by-the-book and he
makes no apology for it. The opening scenes show Will as a devoted
father and loving husband. At first, his daughter's visions of a
shadowy figure are dismissed quietly, but when Will gets physical
evidence of someone lurking around, our curiosity heightens. Sheridan,
who gave us "My Left Foot" and "In The Name of The Father", is not
delivering this thriller to his audience in a platter. He just dishes
out the cards and lets his audience sort them out - at least until the
closing sequences.
At first, it feels rather weird to see beefcake Craig as a domesticated
guy. However, there is a good chemistry between he and Weisz who also
lends a loving and tender touch to the proceedings. The kids, played by
Claire and Taylor Geare, are also convincing and adorable. It would
have been great to see more of Naomi Watts but her role is rather
limited - and she acquits herself professionally. Fans of Rachel G.
Fox, the Scarvo girl in TV's Desperate Housewives, will find her in a
cameo as Ann's daughter Chloe. All in all, a thriller for the thinking
viewer.
22 out of 34 people found the following review useful:
Good Mystery that Deserved a Better Screenplay, 4 March 2012
![]()
Author:
Claudio Carvalho from Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
In New York, the successful editor Will Atenton (Daniel Craig) quits
his job in the GPH Publishers to move to the suburb New Ashford and
dedicate more time to his beloved wife Libby (Rachel Weisz) and his
daughters Trish (Taylor Geare) and DeeDee (Claire Geare) and to start
writing a novel.
The family is frightened by a stranger watching them through the window
and Will decides to investigate and finds teenagers in a satanic cult
in his basement. Sooner he discovers that the family man Peter Ward
killed his wife and his two daughters in that house five years ago.
Will goes to the police but the officers do not give attention to him.
He also learns that Peter Ward spent five years in the Greenhaven
Psychiatric Hospital but was recently discharged.
Will tries to get more information about the murder with his neighbor
on the other side of the street, the divorced Ann Patterson (Naomi
Watts), but she refuses to give any information to him. Will decides to
go to Greenhaven to get information about Peter Ward and he discloses a
dark secret about the former intern that will affect his life in his
dream house.
"Dream House" is a good mystery that deserved a better screenplay. The
story has a great potential and a surprising plot point but does not
develop well important characters and situations after the revelation
of the mystery. Usually this type of twist happens in the end, like in
"The Others", or "Ghost", or "Identity", or "The Sixty Sense". In
"Dream House', the mystery is disclosed too early and the last twist is
very weak and predictable. But anyway I liked this film.
Daniel Craig is one of my favorite contemporary actors and Rachel Weisz
is impressively gorgeous. Naomi Watts is effective, as usual, and the
relationship of Ann with her husband deserved a better development. My
vote is seven.
Title (Brazil): "A Casa dos Sonhos" ("The Dream House")
Note: On 31 March 2012, I saw this film again on Blu-Ray.
14 out of 19 people found the following review useful:
The ending says it all, 6 October 2011
![]()
Author:
richard trombley from United States
*** This review may contain spoilers ***
What if, as in "Jacob's Ladder" and "Siesta", the ending changes everything. In "Jacob's Ladder" we learn at the last moment that what we have been watching has been the thoughts of a dying man. We learn in "Siesta" at the last moment that Claire was murdered, and what we have been watching is her remembering the events of the last few days. In "Dream House" we learn that Will has just returned from a stay in the country where he wrote the book "Dream House". If this is true, what we have been viewing would appear to be the creative process that goes through the writers mind as he is writing his novel. The film, to be sure, has not been constructed as well as it could have been, but viewing it again with the ending in mind may help.
20 out of 32 people found the following review useful:
A Nutshell Review: Dream House, 13 October 2011
Author:
DICK STEEL from Singapore
For those in tune with tabloid fodder, this is the film that brought
Daniel Craig and Rachel Weisz together, and this closeness got
translated on screen as they play husband and wife with two beautiful
children who have uprooted themselves from the bustle of the city and
settled for a quiet suburban area. From the poster alone you may think
you're in a for one heck of a creepy supernatural horror film given the
creepy looking kids blending in with the wallpaper of the titular
house, but this was one great misnomer, coupled with the fact that
director Jim Sheridan and his leading cast have boycotted what was the
final cut of the film when it was wrestled from the director's control,
so as with all troubled productions, the final film bore the brunt of
that falling out, and it tells.
If you are really keen to watch the movie anyhow, then do yourself a
favour and skip the trailer. You have to, because this poorly made
trailer committed two grave mistakes in imagining things not in the
film such as its relentless focus and edit in making one think it's a
horror film complete with boo scares at every turn, and worse, revealed
a crucial plot point of the story, which made it extremely plodding for
those waiting for that particular reveal to show itself so that the
film can then continue on for them. Granted there were a little bit
more twists and turns in store for the final act, though now they
become an exercise of futility just waiting to happen, and didn't come
off as much of a surprise anyway since the bulk of the game was already
out of the bag.
Daniel Craig plays Will Atenton, an aspiring writer who leaves his day
job in order to relocate with his family to spend more quality time
with them, as well as to work on his greatest novel. And what more can
a man ask for with a perfect wife Libby (Rachel Weisz), perfect
children Trish and Dee Dee (Taylor Geare and Claire Geare respectively)
and a perfect, beautiful house to live in. And the narrative really
took a lot of pain to paint this picture of the perfect life, that is
until a shadowy figure started appearing in the front lawn, with
inexplicable situations like a car trying to run Will down starting to
increase in number and frequency, leaving Will no choice but to do a
little bit of personal sleuthing that led to the discovery of just who
he really was, with the narrative then switching gears to discover
whether Will was insane, or wrongly accused.
Like many shows that featured spirits in them, Dream House follows the
mold of having a whodunnit mystery placed into its story, for the
viewer to be actively engaged during the sifting through of red
herrings, and the protagonist either having to encounter spirits that
inevitably assist him in his quest for truth, or impede him by scaring
everyone away. Or at least that was the intent and the potential. What
happened was a sad state of affairs with a very ordinary narrative void
of any scares promised, and came off as more of a mystery, not even a
thriller, that took its time to unfold. And with the small number of
characters, you'll be able to guess in a jiffy just who the guilty
party is. You can probably see shades of Jim Sheridan's intent for a
montage of sequences that probably got included by way of being already
shot, but alas, that vision he had was not to be.
Which is a pity, since this film boasted a strong cast of Craig, Weisz
and severely underutilized actors in Elias Koteas who had so much
promise to be so much more menacing, and in Naomi Campbell who stars as
Will's neighbour who seemed to be ever so interested in Will's state of
affairs and may hold they key to the secret he is looking for.
Ultimately it is not that bad a film, if one can consider a pretty
average fare with ruined twists done in by its own promotional reel,
which held so much prospect in being a psychological mind-bender under
a proper director's hands, rather than to become a by product of what
could have been no thanks to politicking.
31 out of 56 people found the following review useful:
Ward. Peter Ward., 5 October 2011
![]()
Author:
David Ferguson (fergusontx@gmail.com) from Dallas, Texas
Greetings again from the darkness. The horror/thriller idealist in me
just never gives up. With three legit movie stars and a director who is
responsible for one of my favorite movies, I thought this might just be
the genre's rare gem. Instead, it's watchable, kinda fun, and mostly
predictable.
Much of the predictability comes from the trailer, which inexplicably
spoils the key twist in the film. Because of the trailer, I actually
expected an additional twist to contradict the give-away. Instead, it
plays out pretty much as expected, saved only by the efforts of Daniel
Craig and Rachel Weisz (now married in real life). Word is that the
producer of the film, wrestled control away from director Jim Sheridan
(In America, My Left Foot) and edited the film into it's mostly banal
finished state. Such a shame.
Basic story is that a NYC white collar professional quits his job and
moves his wife and two girls to their dream house in a quaint little
community. Problem is, no one told them that a few years back a mom and
her two daughters were murdered, supposedly by the husband who then
spent years in a mental institution. With the help of a neighbor (Naomi
Watts), Craig starts assembling the pieces of the murder mystery and
his new home. On top of that, Elias Koteas is tracking his every move
and watching the house.
The frustration with this one lies in untapped potential. So much more
could have been done with Koteas, Watts and Marton Csokas who plays
Watts' intense ex-husband. For two days after watching this movie, I
kept coming up with new twists and turns that could have made the movie
more suspenseful and entertaining. It's clear that Craig and Weisz are
unhappy with the final product as they have been noticeably absent on
the talk show circuit.
It's not the worst suspense thriller you'll ever see, but there are
better haunted house films on the market.
| Page 1 of 11: | [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] |
| Plot summary | Plot synopsis | Ratings |
| Awards | External reviews | Parents Guide |
| Official site | Plot keywords | Main details |
| Your user reviews | Your vote history |