21 user 92 critic

Film socialisme (2010)

Not Rated | | Drama | 19 May 2010 (France)
A symphony in three movements. Things such as a Mediterranean cruise, numerous conversations, in numerous languages, between the passengers, almost all of whom are on holiday... Our Europe.... See full summary »



(additional material) (as H. Arendt), (additional material) (as W. Benjamin) | 9 more credits »

Watch Now

From $2.99 (SD) on Amazon Video

4 wins & 1 nomination. See more awards »
Learn more

People who liked this also liked... 

Drama | Fantasy
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 5.9/10 X  

The idea is simple: A married woman and a single man meet. They love, they argue, fists fly. A dog strays between town and country. The seasons pass. The man and woman meet again. The dog ... See full summary »

Director: Jean-Luc Godard
Stars: Héloïse Godet, Kamel Abdelli, Richard Chevallier
Notre musique (2004)
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 7/10 X  

Divided into three "kingdoms" -- Enfer (Hell), Purgatoire (Purgatory) and Paradis (Paradise) -- Notre Musique is an indictment of modern times.

Director: Jean-Luc Godard
Stars: Sarah Adler, Nade Dieu, Rony Kramer
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 6.5/10 X  

In part one there is talk of a project on the subject of love, with the example of three couples, one young, one mature and the other elderly. At this point the author comes into contact ... See full summary »

Director: Jean-Luc Godard
Stars: Bruno Putzulu, Cécile Camp, Jean Davy
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 6.3/10 X  

13 European directors explore the theme of Sarajevo and what this city represents in European history over the past hundred years, and what Sarajevo incarnates today in Europe. From ... See full summary »

Directors: Leonardo di Costanzo, Jean-Luc Godard, and 11 more credits »
Stars: Bogdan Ninkovic, Fedja Stamenkovic, Andrej Ivancic
La chinoise (1967)
Comedy | Drama
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 7.3/10 X  

A small group of French students are studying Mao, trying to find out their position in the world and how to change the world to a Maoistic community using terrorism.

Director: Jean-Luc Godard
Stars: Anne Wiazemsky, Jean-Pierre Léaud, Juliet Berto
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 7.2/10 X  

Characterized by deconstructivism and philosophical references and by briefly exposing the good, bad, and ugly periods of the country's history, this post-modern film portrays the abstract ... See full summary »

Director: Jean-Luc Godard
Stars: Eddie Constantine, Hanns Zischler, Claudia Michelsen
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 7.5/10 X  

Godard looks into the Bosnia conflict in the early 1990's.

Director: Jean-Luc Godard
Stars: Jean-Luc Godard
Hail Mary (1985)
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 6.7/10 X  

In this modern retelling of the Virgin birth, Mary is a student who plays basketball and works at her father's petrol station; Joseph is an earnest dropout who drives a cab. The angel ... See full summary »

Director: Jean-Luc Godard
Stars: Myriem Roussel, Thierry Rode, Philippe Lacoste
Comedy | Drama | War
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 6.6/10 X  

Jean-Luc Godard's densely packed rumination on the need to create order and beauty in a world ruled by chaos is divided into four distinct but tangentially related stories, including the ... See full summary »

Director: Jean-Luc Godard
Stars: Madeleine Assas, Ghalia Lacroix, Bérangère Allaux
King Lear (1987)
Comedy | Drama | Sci-Fi
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 5.7/10 X  

Everything returns to normal after Chernobyl. That is, everything but art. Most of the great works are lost, and it is up to people like William Shakespear Junior the Fifth to restore the ... See full summary »

Director: Jean-Luc Godard
Stars: Woody Allen, Freddy Buache, Leos Carax
Comedy | Drama | War
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 7/10 X  

During a war in an imaginary country, unscrupulous soldiers recruit poor farmers with promises of an easy and happy life. Two of these farmers write to their wives of their exploits.

Director: Jean-Luc Godard
Stars: Patrice Moullet, Marino Masé, Geneviève Galéa
Détective (1985)
Comedy | Crime | Drama
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 6.2/10 X  

In a palace of Paris. Two detectives are investigating a two-year-old murder. Emile and Francoise Chenal are putting pressure on Jim Fox Warner, a boxing manager, who owes them a huge ... See full summary »

Director: Jean-Luc Godard
Stars: Laurent Terzieff, Aurelle Doazan, Jean-Pierre Léaud


Cast overview, first billed only:
Jean-Marc Stehlé ...
Otto Goldberg (segment "Des choses comme ça") (as J. M. Stehlé)
Agatha Couture ...
Alissa (segment "Des choses comme ça") (as A. Couture)
Mathias Domahidy ...
Mathias (segment "Des choses comme ça") (as M. Domahidy)
Quentin Grosset ...
Ludovic (segment "Des choses comme ça") (as Q. Grosset)
Olga Riazanova ...
Olga - Russian secret agent (segment "Des choses comme ça") (as O. Riazanova)
Maurice Sarfati ...
(segment "Des choses comme ça") (as M. Sarfati)
Herself - Singer (segment "Des choses comme ça") (as P. Smith)
Lenny Kaye ...
Himself - Guitarist (segment "Des choses comme ça") (as L. Kaye)
Bernard Maris ...
Himself - Economist (segment "Des choses comme ça") (as B. Maris)
Marie-Christine Bergier ...
Frieda von Salomon (segment "Des choses comme ça") (as M.-C. Bergier)
Nadège Beausson-Diagne ...
Constance (segment "Des choses comme ça") (as N. Beausson)
Bob Maloubier ...
Himself - French secret agent (segment "Des choses comme ça") (as R. Maloubier)
Dominique Devals ...
(segment "Des choses comme ça") (as D. Devals)
Alain Badiou ...
Himself - Lecturer (segment "Des choses comme ça") (as A. Badiou)
Elias Sanbar ...
Himself - Haifan Historian (segment "Des choses comme ça") (as E. Sanbar)


A symphony in three movements. Things such as a Mediterranean cruise, numerous conversations, in numerous languages, between the passengers, almost all of whom are on holiday... Our Europe. At night, a sister and her younger brother have summoned their parents to appear before the court of their childhood. The children demand serious explanations of the themes of Liberty, Equality and Fraternity. Our humanities. Visits to six sites of true or false myths: Egypt, Palestine, Odessa, Hellas, Naples and Barcelona. Written by Anonymous

Plot Summary | Add Synopsis


La liberté coûte cher (Freedom is expensive) See more »




Not Rated | See all certifications »





| | | | |

Release Date:

19 May 2010 (France)  »

Also Known As:

Film socialisme  »

Box Office

Opening Weekend:

$4,526 (USA) (3 June 2011)


$31,733 (USA) (30 September 2011)

Company Credits

Show detailed on  »

Technical Specs


Sound Mix:

(as Dolby)|


Aspect Ratio:

1.78 : 1
See  »

Did You Know?


The cruise liner used in the film is the ill-fated Costa Concordia, which was shipwrecked so tragically on Friday 13th January 2012 off the coast of Italy. See more »


Edited from Alexander the Great (1956) See more »

Frequently Asked Questions

This FAQ is empty. Add the first question.

User Reviews

No comment
26 November 2010 | by (IN) – See all my reviews

As a longtime Godard fan (especially his later works, like "Every Man For Himself" and "King Lear"), the wait for his latest film was excruciating; it had been 6 long years since the brilliant "Notre Musique" confounded and shocked me with its eye-popping imagery, jarring editing, and poetic dialogue. Something I've noticed about Godard is that he always strives for more and is always willing to take his ideas and methods and approach further and further. I was expecting a pure information overload with "Film Socialisme", and I was not let down. There is a lot going on in this picture, and it's going to take many, many watches for me to understand everything, to piece together all the information. No matter -- Godard's works have always been densely-layered and offer rewards for those willing to keep watching.

Such is the case here; Godard seems to be be in Histoire(s) du cinéma mode here, since this film -- for the most part -- resembles his work with that brilliant "film essay" series, as well as calling to mind films like Numero Deux and Comment Ca Va? Godard, for the first time, shot this entire film on digital, and the results are fascinating, sometimes even... funny. During one part, the crappy digital camera he had been shooting with appears to have been failing -- or at least, there was some failure when transferred to the computer for editing -- as parts skip ahead, and backwards; there are artifacts on the screen, audible and visual glitches, obscuring moments of a character's speech. This wasn't my DVD -- this was definitely part of the film. Other parts of the (early parts of) movie seem to have been filmed on really crappy webcams, then the footage was oversaturated... the results are quite jarring, especially when some of the "crap" footage is put next to some of the most beautiful digital filmography I've ever seen. There are audio messups, video glitches; recording synch sound on a boat in itself is absurd, as you mainly hear wind, people screaming in the distant, the engine of the ship; in sequences filming a party, you basically can't hear anything but fart sounds, a loud distorted booming and crashing. So, Godard seems to be using new technology against itself, in a way. He plays with jump cuts (which he popularized 50 years ago and has rarely used since), stop-motion (filming a camera being reassembled), dramatic pausing, silence, glitching, and slow motion. The first 40 minutes are all kinda like this; voices from who-knows-where delivering lines that were important to Godard, as image after image is shown in very quick bursts; some images were jaw-droppingly beautiful, some were distorted beyond comprehension -- all were striking. Godard is first and foremost an artist, and rest assured that the first 40 minutes are highly artistic. Not a dull moment in what can only be described as a postmodern documentary. Has Godard been watching the Current Channel? Has he been surfing Youtube? There definitely seems to be a lot of influence from outside sources in this part of the film, maybe even some of video art manipulating master Ryan Trecartin...

Then, the next part of the film -- a good 30-40 minutes -- is extremely "Godardian". It should be very familiar to people who have seen any of Godard's recent films. There's not a lot of image or sound manipulation here; just lots of long, quiet takes of characters discussing life... usually filmed in front of strikingly beautiful backdrops. This section calls to mind every film he's made in the last 30 years, Some people call this "alienating", but his style is so brilliantly personal, I can't help but be fascinated. The direction in this section is topnotch, of course...

...and it leads to the final 30 minutes, which is mostly a film essay, with dialogue over top of mostly stock footage (scenes from other films).

So, it's an overwhelming experience, but I never felt it was 'tiring'; I could've watched another hour or two of this stuff, definitely. Therein lies its brilliance. While, indeed, its difficult to sum up in a few words, its not difficult to understand why its so compelling; this is one giant ball of images, sounds, quotes, hitting us so fast that we can barely keep up. I'm not qualified to put forth everything this film meant to me, after just one watch, but I do know I will be watching this film 100 more times in the future, because it's just so captivating.

Forgot to mention... LOLcats are on this, as well as a lama who lives in a garage.

A truly brilliant experience that a lot of people will find "difficult" or "challenging", but to be completely honest, this is one of Godard's most easy-to-get-into films in a long time; by adopting the elliptical "youtube editing" and by going into "Sensory overload" mode (at least, for a lot of its length), Godard has actually managed to make a film that even an A.D.D.-addled teenage could probably enjoy... all the while, commenting on aspects such AS sensory overload, technology, language, and how impersonal and cold everyone in 2010 is. Characters speak but don't "converse". Talk, talk, talk... but no one listens. No one responds. In many ways, this is a style Godard has always utilized, but this is his best display of it; this might be the ultimate Godard film.

PS: I originally had a LOT more written on each section, but I had to keep removing chunks of it to get it to the 1000 word limit. I suspect anybody who tries to review this film will probably face the same challenge; there is just simply too much to say about this film. Truly the best film of the past 10 years.

30 of 51 people found this review helpful.  Was this review helpful to you?

Contribute to This Page

Create a character page for: