In an apartment building where neighbors, friends, and family are living in close quarters, three male protagonists encounter three phases of manhood in Turkish society. Directors Reha ... See full summary »
A small, poor village leaning over high rocky mountains, facing the immense sea, flanked by olive yards. Villagers are simple and diligent people who struggle to cope with a harsh nature. ... See full summary »
It's the 1930s. The Republic Day Ball is in progress in Zonguldak, a coal mining town in Turkey. Among the invited guests are the newcomers to this small and boring town: Halit, an engineer... See full summary »
Isa is beaten up after being accused of stealing $50. When his landlord demands the back rent, Isa gets angry and shoots him. The police round up the tenants, but are not suspicious of him.... See full summary »
Celal, lives an unhappy family life with his wife Sevilay and his child in a small town. Celal and his brother Cemal, running an electrician shop which doesn't go well. They are in debt. ... See full summary »
Musa, who works as a bookkeeper in the customs office, believes in the emptiness and absurdity of life. He doesn't struggle to change his life; he lets himself flow along with events ... See full summary »
Zeki Demirkubuz plays the lead character Ahmet who wants to make a film about Dostoyevsky's 'Crime and Punishment'. He falls into a deep depression, loses interest in the film and life, ... See full summary »
I really liked the movie. This is the second movie of a trilogy. The first in the series was "Cenneti Beklerken" and the third one is "Golgeler ve Suretler (Shadows and Faces)". These three movies have very different settings and story lines, but a common theme in all is the issue of morally good vs. bad action. "Is it an individual's moral stance that makes an act good or bad?" " What is the morally good act in a complicated situation?" are the kinds of questions that one asks while watching these movies. Another common element in these three movies is that Dervis Zaim has engaged with one form of Ottoman traditional art in each of them. In the first one, it was miniature. In the third one it's the traditional shadow play (Karagoz and Hacivat), and in this second one, Nokta (Dot), it is the Ottoman art of Calligraphy. Indeed, in "Nokta" (Dot), it is the way Zaim has engaged with the art of Calligraphy that has impressed me most. Reading a little bit about Caligraphy after watching the movie, I have realized how he used it to improve/push the limits of/experiment new forms in cinema. For example, he used Tuz Golu (Salt Lake) like an empty sheet and his camera like a pen and ink, as if he was writing calligraphy. Just like a calligrapher, who'd not lift his hand and his pen until he is finished, Zaim never moved his camera to another setting than Tuz Golu. This exchange between the two art forms (calligraphy and cinema) is impressive. Similarly, the parallels between the dot that was never put in the calligraphy written in the 16th century (the story told in the movie) and the death of Ahmed making him a dot on the lake and a dot that ends his suffering just made the movie a journey to the joys of discovering new details. I feel like one needs to watch it over and over again, each time paying attention to different details hidden in the interaction between the form and the content of the movie.
0 of 0 people found this review helpful.
Was this review helpful to you?