|Page 5 of 42:||              |
|Index||417 reviews in total|
Summary: The premise is the worst I ever heard of, the plot is lame,
and the film ended really poorly. You didn't get sucked into the world
of the film, the special effects and action are not cool. There was bad
acting. At this point there is nothing worth seeing about the film
besides Damon acting well and a typical love story, but this was
supposed to be a thriller. This movie would be a waste of drugs if you
thought they could aid in making it watchable. This movie isn't
romantic enough to make your girl swoon at any point. You will never
say "That was awesome", you may laugh at the stupidity of the film or
simply say "I don't care about this $#*+"
Here's why this film will disappoint you for watching it:
Ending: Cop-out and includes an infuriatingly cheesy life philosophy. This ending alone would ruin even a good film.
Big Bad Guy: Will not scare you. Doesn't do much.
Special Effects: Doors open to different places than they should. This is the big special effect in the movie, it is not noteworthy and not a reason this film is worth seeing. Other special effects are not interesting and few and far between.
Poor acting: If you weren't a main character, you got typical confident bad guy lines. These lines were delivered very flat and made the characters forgettable.
Bad guy's kryptonite: Dumb enough to embarrass you for watching. I won't spoil the film, but there are two and both of them should have been left out because they never mattered. They seemed to be added as an afterthought or got bungled in production and are some artifact of a more thought out plot device.
Plot Hole: Hard not to make this a spoiler....they were larger holes than are usually acceptable, not even being picky here 1.) Something all knowing didn't know something very obvious 2.) If you invited me to your house and I decided to light all the furniture on fire, would your response be "When you're done using that lighter, could you help me put out these fires?"
In short - give me my 2 hours back! There were countless books written
and movies shot about destiny and our ability to control it, but never
before have I seen such a simplistic, idiot-proof, insulting to the
intelligence, take on this topic.
Damon delivers one of his most bland performances to date, and is not helped by a lackluster script and a boring, linear storyline. This half-hearted effort couldn't have made it as an episode of the twilight zone, let alone a feature length movie.
A movie can be intelligent, interesting, involving, fun, entertaining, actually it can be almost anything... Problem is, this movie is nothing. Just a waste of digital space and 2 hours of my life. (Or may be the bureau wanted me to see it in the first place.)
2/10. If it was any worse, I'd have walked out.
Do we control our destiny, or do unseen forces manipulate us? Matt
Damon stars in the thriller The Adjustment Bureau as a man who glimpses
the future Fate has planned for him and realizes he wants something
else. To get it, he must pursue the only woman he's ever loved across,
under and through the streets of modern-day New York. On the brink of
winning a seat in the U.S. Senate, ambitious politician David Norris
(Damon) meets beautiful contemporary ballet dancer Elise Sellas (Emily
Blunt)--a woman like none he's ever known. But just as he realizes he's
falling for her, mysterious men conspire to keep the two apart. David
learns he is up against the agents of Fate itself--the men of The
Adjustment Bureau--who will do everything in their considerable power
to prevent David and Elise from being together. In the face of
overwhelming odds, he must either let her go and accept a predetermined
path...or risk everything to defy Fate and be with her. The Adjustment
Bureau is written for the screen and directed by George Nolfi (writer
of Ocean's Twelve, co-writer of The Bourne Ultimatum). It is based on a
short story by Philip K. Dick ("Total Recall," "Minority Report" and
This is a very lovely movie must watch for all people !
David Norris(Matt Damon) a man running for senate, but is quickly
losing votes, due to an embarrassing incident. And just when he is
ready to settle on defeat, he meets Elise(Emily Blunt), a dancer he
befriends, and encourages him to keep running. David is smitten by her,
and another chance meeting with Elise again, starts to make David think
she could be the one for him. But some mysterious figures capture
David, they tell him, that they are controllers of fate, and say he
can't see Elise again. But will David obey or defy them?
Matt Damon and Emily Blunt are perfectly put together, as the forbidden lovers, they are so convincing, you instantly buy it. The rest of the cast are also good, so is Terrance Stamp. A well put together suspenseful supernatural love story. It's right up there with Inception.
*** This review may contain spoilers ***
"There's much to be said for challenging fate instead of ducking behind
it." Diana Trilling
Fate, determinism, chance, existential choice, and love-- all need adjustment, and the sci-fi The Adjustment Bureau is right for you if you love those abstractions and miss Twilight Zone and X Files. Matt Damon gives a strong under-acted performance as a New York senatorial candidate dogged by the Adjustment Bureau under the direction of a "chairman" who writes the life plan for specially targeted humans. His minions adjust as is necessary to the god-like's plans with as few "ripples" as possible.
Based on Philip K. Dick's short story, The Adjustment Team, it's an imaginative screenplay that takes itself not too seriously but risks being underdeveloped. What distinguishes Damon's David and his dancer-love Elise (Emily Blunt) is their determination to fulfill their serious love despite the Bureau's plans contrary to the consummation. The on-screen chemistry between Blunt and Damon is so pleasing that I am tempted to call this film a romance rather than a sci-fi thriller.
Actually, what makes me so favorable is the nicely-acted romance, which asks questions about whether to choose love or public service, love or professional success. For the existentialist, these are vexing alternatives squarely in the realm of personal choice, not a bureau's design.
Therein rests the philosophical core of the film: Can mankind be trusted with free will given how badly they have screwed up over the last 2000 years or so? The Bureau's notable success at intervention during the 16th through 19th centuries promises that it needs to make itself felt again, especially as the path of a future USA president must be controlled.
Although I am tempted to cite the absurdities of the plot and the philosophical inconsistencies, I will refrain in favor of a pleasantly provocative tale that tries more than most other films at this time to engage our minds. The parallel to Inception is not far-fetched; the manipulation is just different. But in the end the humans must take control of their fates, and in both films they do.\
Although it's not Blade Runner or Minority Report (both Dick stories), I applaud a film that dares to remind us of our determination to forge productive lives. Egyptians today are living proof of the power of free will.
"If I'm not supposed to be with her, why do I feel like this?" Dave Norris about Elise and the Bureau's plan to keep them apart.
While the agents (angels?) are powerful enough to erase minds and alter
anyone's circumstances, they nonetheless *must* keep their magic hats
on. They also constantly consult what appears to be mildly-advanced
I can't imagine why Matt Damon agreed to this project. Was anyone involved in this production familiar with the adage, "Show, don't tell." There is on-going and seemingly never-ending exposition, which only succeeds in exposing the silliness of the plot. Further, there are the rules that Damon's character is not to break, but when he does so anyway, his punishments are about as harsh as those Hogan received from Colonel Klink.
Meanwhile, the love story is weak (just as the actors' chemistry). Unconvincing, they declare they've found "true love," when they've only spent a handful of brief moments together. Hey, at least their "meet cute" was especially accidental.
Overall, it's an overly long and fairly lame film. You just might want to skip this one.
A new member of the official Hollywood script-pickers club. Not even Ben Affleck would touch this one. The ideas for new movies are becoming increasingly bizarre. Inception, The Tourist and now this oddment. Let's stick to remakes, or even movies that aren't exact remakes but are really (for example, Goonies becomes Super 8). Some people believe that you need to go to a cinema and view these pieces of work on the silver screen. Unfortunately, you have to pay for that and since George Lucas's hi-jacking of Star Wars I am reluctant to trust the straight to general cinema releases as a mark of quality. In fact, the limited release movies are often much more creative and original. I give this movie 2 stars but only for the ridiculous hats, the true stars of the show.
*** This review may contain spoilers ***
I guess the Film leaves you mostly unsatisfied and not in the good way.
I watched it at a Sneak Preview tonight, hadn't seen any trailers and
knew nothing about the story so far. After the first couple of scenes i
really thought, man thats some nice ideas there on the screen book.
Sadly enough i started to get more disappointed scene after scene.
A couple of things really really annoyed me during the movie like "hey we're the bad guys you can't beat us - just so you know our only weakness is water" i mean that is just to easy for such a production don't you think?
And even though the film played with the ironic of the adjusters being that weak, i never really felt some sort of danger for the love story. I mean once Damon and blunt start using the doors it starts getting pathetic and can't be taken serious in any way anymore. I mean the love scene at the statue of liberty? Zero effort by the director.
I mean i expected something like this to happen in the end. But it was way more awful than i thought. Really?? Cmon! That was cheap. Believe in Love, make your own destiny? I really had the feeling nobody had any interest to make the original good concept into a good shaped movie.
Nevertheless i liked the Character Norris and the scenes between him and the adjusters had something to me. Overall still a little sad that they did not made some more complex out of the idea.
Just my opinion - and taste is different
I struggled to get a handle on this sci-fi romance. Is it the meeting
of Damon & Blunt's cleft chins? Perhaps, in a reversal of the
postmodern revisiting of the 1960s in Mad Men this is Roger Sterling
(John Slattery)'s tinkering with the future?
No, really, it's just another tepid Philip K Dick adaptation. At its time of release (this week) it's fashionable to say its Bourne (the Damon bit) meets Inception (the magic realism bit). However it bears resemblance to others too - Vanilla Sky (noumenal New York), Minority Report (more Dick), The Thomas Crown Affair (hats), The Matrix (predetermination) and even Eternal Sunshine Of The Spotless Mind (sci- fi romance) to name a few (oh, go on then - Orson Welles' The Trial is also in there).
Like many mongrel films it ends up being less than the sum of its parts. Though Damon has charisma and John Slattery injects some realist ennui into his deus in machina role, damp, compliant phone-ins from Emily Blunt and Terence Stamp shackle the show. The shortcomings of the cast are entirely of a part with the production - the film doesn't know what it wants to be. It tries to be all of the above, jumping from a scene of *fun* through a door marked *thrills* and then on to another door marked *romance* without backing itself up. Diverting 5/10
This is probably the worst movie i've seen in a while. There's a bunch
of flaws that's I'll be discussing but the worst one is the
unconvincing concept of the men with hats that never had any
credibility at any point.
While watching I couldn't help but to be reminded of The Matrix (a film that DOES convince us with it's bizarre concept) because of the 'agents'. We're never given any backstory on these men with their hats who happen to control everything around them. Who are these people? Where did they get this power and how? We just have to assume that they have a book in which they see everything that goes on. Their hats allow them to open doors and teleport from place to place (similair again to the matrix but without the hats). The turning of the doorknobs to the left or right is also very important, but why?Why the hats? How does that make sense? Is there a device in the hats that allows them to do so? Is it magic? Never is any explanation given and it makes us ask all these questions because this is all happening in OUR world. To compare it to the Matrix again (where a lot of strange thing happen as well); in the Matrix the strange things that happen, happen in the Virtual world so it's much easier to assume that everything can happen there, because it's a VIRTUAL world. That's not the case in this film.
The second major flaw I noticed (which could be personal preference) is the unconvincing romance. The whole 'we we're meant to be together, it's fate' type of thing is unoriginal and predictable because you know what will happen at the end.
There were also plenty of corny and preachy dialogues which I could point out to you if I had a copy of the script, but it's not worth the effort. In essence this is a cheap B-movie produced with a Hollywood budget. This film is a bad execution of a known concept (previously seen in films like The Matrix, Enemy of the State) combined with a typical Hollywood romance.
|Page 5 of 42:||              |
|Plot summary||Plot synopsis||Ratings|
|Awards||External reviews||Parents Guide|
|Official site||Plot keywords||Main details|
|Your user reviews||Your vote history|