|
Deuce of Spades (2010)When a hotrod girl finds a mysterious letter dating back to the fifties hidden in her roadster, she is left with nothing but questions... She sets out to find the answers and retrace her ... See full summary » Director:Faith GrangerWriter:Faith Granger |
| Watch Trailer 0Share... |
User Lists
Related lists from IMDb users
Share this Rating
Title: Deuce of Spades (2010)
Want to share IMDb's rating on your own site? Use the HTML below.
Edit
Cast
| Cast overview, first billed only: | |||
 |
Timothy Luke | ... | |
|
|
Faith Granger | ... |
Faith
|
| Alexandra Holder | ... | ||
| Jordan Warren | ... | ||
|
|
Kyle Clifford | ... | |
| Kristin Findley | ... | ||
|
|
Carol-Lynn Campbell | ... | |
| Gary Miller-Youst | ... | ||
|
|
Alanna Stites | ... | |
| Frank O'Leary | ... | ||
| Peggy Sue Honeyman-Scott | ... |
Jeanne Callaway
|
|
| Wes Kemp | ... |
James Callaway
|
|
|
|
Nathan Ramirez | ... | |
| Jack E. Curenton | ... |
Tommy Miller - present day
(as Jack Curenton)
|
|
|
|
Terry Starling | ... |
Helen Thompson
|
Edit
Plot Summary
|
Add Synopsis
Storyline
When a hotrod girl finds a mysterious letter dating back to the fifties hidden in her roadster, she is left with nothing but questions... She sets out to find the answers and retrace her deuce's troubled past. Who is Johnny Callaway? But will learning the truth make a difference and can a broken man ever get a second chance at a happiness long forgotten? Fast hotrods, cool cats, gravity defying swing dancing and rockin' retro music all serve as a colorful backdrop to this heartfelt, inspiring story. Discover an underground scene where counter culture is in, old school is cool and nostalgia forever reigns. Written by Faith Granger
Taglines:
Do you believe in second chances?Genres:
DramaParents Guide:
Add content advisory for parents »
Edit
See more »
See full technical specs »
Details
Country:
USALanguage:
EnglishRelease Date:
2010 (USA) See more »Filming Locations:
San Fernando Valley, Los Angeles, California, USABox Office
Budget:
$250,000 (estimated)Company Credits
Show detailed
company contact information
on
IMDbPro »
If you'll read the other reviews, you'll notice that every single one of them gives the movie the maximum rating, gushes on about how great it is, etc. It is extremely clear that these aren't reviews by random people who "just happened" to rent the movie or see it online or whatever, they are obviously people who somehow know the filmmaker, are members of hotrod groups to whom this film has already been marketed, etc. It's obvious that the film's owner/creator/whatever has solicited these comments and reviews under the mistaken impression that they will somehow influence others, which is a mistake. I just watched it online, it was certainly good for a first effort, but Jackie Grainger still has a ways to go when it comes to perfecting her craft. This is a noble first time effort, but it doesn't, contrary to the "sincere and unsolicited reviews", deserve a spot in the "top films of all time" et al. The acting is, in spots, terrible and at more than two hours, it was about 30 minutes longer than I felt it should have been (a common mistake made by first-timers who cut their own work).