In Fairytale of Kathmandu director, Neasa Ní Chianáin follows her hero, an Irish gay poet, to Nepal, where he spends 4 months every year. He calls it his spiritual home and inspiration for ... See full summary »

Watch Now

$0.00 with Prime Video

2 wins & 2 nominations. See more awards »


In Fairytale of Kathmandu director, Neasa Ní Chianáin follows her hero, an Irish gay poet, to Nepal, where he spends 4 months every year. He calls it his spiritual home and inspiration for his writing. He has relationships with many Nepalese boys there. He pays their school fees, buys them clothes. Director Neasa Ní Chianáin talks to the appreciative boys that Ó Searcaigh befriends, and starts to question her hero's motives in this challenging film on loss of innocence and personal morals. Written by David Rane

Plot Summary | Add Synopsis

Plot Keywords:

poet | nepal | irish | innocence | youth | See All (10) »


Not every fairytale has a happy ever after





Official Sites:




| |

Release Date:

22 November 2007 (Netherlands)  »

Filming Locations:


Box Office


£220,000 (estimated)

Company Credits

Show detailed on  »

Technical Specs

Sound Mix:



Aspect Ratio:

1.85 : 1
See  »

Frequently Asked Questions

This FAQ is empty. Add the first question.

User Reviews

Yes, but...
30 May 2009 | by (France) – See all my reviews

An interesting film in many ways... At the beginning the film-maker is in awe of the Irish gay poet who she is following about and doing a documentary on. However, when she follows him to Nepal where he goes for 4 months every year..little by little she begins to realize that he has an ever-growing coterie of young men (around 17 years old on average) who he is befriending, buying all kinds of things for - and then inviting up to his hotel room to spend the night. In the end, the film-maker confronts him directly... after having interviewed some of the boys he bedded. By the end of the film there is a bad taste left in your mouth.

And yet... I know someone in Paris who cruises after young straight Arab and Indian youth (he's of Indian origins himself). And he gets them - so many of them and with such ease... and the guys keep coming back for more. It is usually HE who puts an end to things as he gets bored and wants someone new.

The major difference between the Irish poet in Nepal and the people this guy in Paris gets, is that the Paris guy only gives them a pack of cigarettes or some beer - and not necessarily all the time, either. If they ask for money, he gives them maximum 5 Euros, whereas the Irish poet is giving his guys astonishing sums of money (the equivalent of three months' wages in Nepal), or buying them 150 Euro bikes etc.

So - when the film-maker corners some of these kids, and they begin to complain that they didn't really want the sex, I'm not totally convinced. When asked directly, they seem to feel that they are expected to be indignant...and so they are! Yet the kids in Paris keep coming back for more without the major financial incentives that the Nepalese kids are getting. Hey, how many 17 year old males are gonna complain about frequent and easy sex? They don't seem to mind that it is a guy instead of a girl...especially if they are being the "active" partner.

So the question is... is this film-maker manipulating her audience as much as the poet seems to be manipulating the guys he picks up? The film-maker "doesn't want to moralize", but can't help mentioning that the boys are 17 and he is 50. Would she feel better if he were only 25?

One of the boys the poet picked up many years ago has been helped through school by him, and also has a jewelry shop for tourists that was completely bought by the poet. He considers the poet as his second father (his real father is dead)... and states very plainly that he loves him, and sees nothing wrong with giving back to the poet his affection and his body; he is now married (an arranged marriage) and has a child, but still feels completely linked to the poet. He states that his relationship with the poet totally changed his life - that without him he would have ended up as a poor farmer or a worker in a sweat-shop. His life is infinitely better for having known the poet... and all of this is certainly true. So in the end, who has really been harmed here, apart from the film-maker whose disappointment and standard Western value-system makes her shy away from accepting these relationships as anything except negative? As I said - an interesting film in many the hands of another film-maker, it might well have come to entirely different conclusions...

9 of 14 people found this review helpful.  Was this review helpful to you?

Message Boards

Discuss Fairytale of Kathmandu (2007) on the IMDb message boards »

Contribute to This Page