MOVIEmeter
SEE RANK
Down 39,282 this week

High Anxieties: The Mathematics of Chaos (2008)

TV Movie  -   -  14 October 2008 (UK)
8.2
Your rating:
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 -/10 X  
Ratings: 8.2/10 from 26 users  
Reviews: 1 user

A discussion of the mathematics of chaos that tries to tie it to climate change and fluctuating financial markets.

0Check in
0Share...

User Lists

Related lists from IMDb users

a list of 374 titles
created 21 Oct 2011
 
a list of 37 titles
created 05 Feb 2013
 
a list of 9 titles
created 01 Jun 2013
 

Connect with IMDb


Share this Rating

Title: High Anxieties: The Mathematics of Chaos (TV Movie 2008)

High Anxieties: The Mathematics of Chaos (TV Movie 2008) on IMDb 8.2/10

Want to share IMDb's rating on your own site? Use the HTML below.

Take The Quiz!

Test your knowledge of High Anxieties: The Mathematics of Chaos.
Edit

Cast

Credited cast:
James Lovelock ...
Himself
David Malone ...
Himself - Presenter
Edit

Storyline

A discussion of the mathematics of chaos that tries to tie it to climate change and fluctuating financial markets.

Plot Summary | Add Synopsis

Edit

Details

Country:

Language:

Release Date:

14 October 2008 (UK)  »

Also Known As:

Ta mathimatika tou haous  »

Company Credits

Show detailed on  »

Technical Specs

Runtime:

Color:

See  »

Frequently Asked Questions

This FAQ is empty. Add the first question.

User Reviews

 
Chaos? Could have fooled me
12 January 2012 | by (Canada) – See all my reviews

This is not a documentary about chaos.

Rather, it's a brief history of the 20th century, with some vague gesturings toward some math. It's presented as though discovering the math of chaos somehow drove billions of individual people to feel happy or sad about the world. I doubt that citizens of the 20th century knew anything about the math of chaos, or even cared if they did. As for us, we're not really told ANYTHING about the math of chaos, beyond the fact that it might be chaotic.

In terms of the history, we're told how Newtonian predictability gave way to chaos, but then we tamed it a bit, and then George W Bush happened. Or something.

At the film's conclusion, we're told that we shouldn't worry so much about global warming because there's nothing we can do about it anyway. This is AFTER they spent an hour telling us that we simply cannot know things like that, and that actions as small as the flapping of butterfly wings can have large outcomes. Using this sleight of hand, they encourage us not to try, because apparently the risk of short-term job loss is more important than the risk of throwing most or all of humanity back to the stone age, or into extinction. It also completely ignores the fact that most steps being taken to address global warming would need to happen anyway, because there's not an infinite supply of material to dig out of the ground.

I rate this as high as 6 because it does at least tell you the names of some people who discovered some things about the math of chaos. But if you have access to Wikipedia, don't waste your time on this.


0 of 3 people found this review helpful.  Was this review helpful to you?

Message Boards

Recent Posts
the one review so far happybillmoore

Contribute to This Page