Arundhati
- 2009
- 2h 11m
IMDb RATING
7.4/10
3.7K
YOUR RATING
A brave queen battles an evil mystic. Three generations later, he comes back to haunt the queen's descendants.A brave queen battles an evil mystic. Three generations later, he comes back to haunt the queen's descendants.A brave queen battles an evil mystic. Three generations later, he comes back to haunt the queen's descendants.
- Director
- Writers
- Stars
- Awards
- 7 wins & 9 nominations total
Aachi Manorama
- Chandramma
- (as Manorama)
- Director
- Writers
- All cast & crew
- Production, box office & more at IMDbPro
Featured reviews
Don't get me wrong - "Arundhati" is a good movie and a definite one-time watch material. It is based on similar lines of "Chandramukhi" and perhaps a yardstick. The plot unfolds at various points ensuring the audience is engaged at all times. Arundhati draws laurels on two aspects - the technical and the performances. Being a horror movie it effectively manages to scare the living daylights at many places. There is lots of blood, gore and unspeakable, so faint-hearted stay away.
∆ Anuskha Shetty:: Manages to don both the roles of Arundhati/ Jejamma with ease.
∆ Sonu Sood:: The devil reincarnate character is borough to life with his awesome performance. Anushkha & Sonu are the two pillar which the movie rests upon.
∆ Sayaji Shinde:: Convincing performance as usual (and as usual, he is loud!).
∆ The actor who played Rahul:: Your role is shorter than special appearance. Go on and blow your trumpet in your neighbourhood about your blink-and-miss appearance!
However to play devil's advocate - its a 1980's Ramsay Bros storyline. Old wine in new bottle - thanks to the clever narrative, good performances and use of new technology. In fact CGI's are an overkill. In addition, there are quite a lot of creative liberties in the narrative. Had the screenplay been tightened up, it would certainly been a flawless "Chandramuki".
Kodi Ramakrishna is making an sincere attempt to keep his boat sailing in the changing times.
∆ Anuskha Shetty:: Manages to don both the roles of Arundhati/ Jejamma with ease.
∆ Sonu Sood:: The devil reincarnate character is borough to life with his awesome performance. Anushkha & Sonu are the two pillar which the movie rests upon.
∆ Sayaji Shinde:: Convincing performance as usual (and as usual, he is loud!).
∆ The actor who played Rahul:: Your role is shorter than special appearance. Go on and blow your trumpet in your neighbourhood about your blink-and-miss appearance!
However to play devil's advocate - its a 1980's Ramsay Bros storyline. Old wine in new bottle - thanks to the clever narrative, good performances and use of new technology. In fact CGI's are an overkill. In addition, there are quite a lot of creative liberties in the narrative. Had the screenplay been tightened up, it would certainly been a flawless "Chandramuki".
Kodi Ramakrishna is making an sincere attempt to keep his boat sailing in the changing times.
The producer of the movie made this movie around 10 years back; he didn't any movie after that. What a great lover of movies. He made movies only if he love the story.
I see it as a grand and heroic horror film!
It could be a strongly unforgettable horror film for many, but I watch it recently (yes I'm so late for this I apologize).
The story, casts, and crews deserve all possible recognition. The second time I watch it, I just realized that it's not only about 'good defeats bad', but also about how Jejamma sacrificed herself. What a sweet entry scene of hers and what a strong ending she did. Anushka makes her top performance earlier back then.
Along with fine script, make-up, and props, its' good editing make the filmis satisfying to be watched.
Pasupathi was the creepiest. Allow me to be "too much", but his characterization is still relatable in today's condition - human's obsession is creepier and more dangerous than ghosts. Sonu Sood is a gem and a potential on-screen villain that people love anytime.
It could be a strongly unforgettable horror film for many, but I watch it recently (yes I'm so late for this I apologize).
The story, casts, and crews deserve all possible recognition. The second time I watch it, I just realized that it's not only about 'good defeats bad', but also about how Jejamma sacrificed herself. What a sweet entry scene of hers and what a strong ending she did. Anushka makes her top performance earlier back then.
Along with fine script, make-up, and props, its' good editing make the filmis satisfying to be watched.
Pasupathi was the creepiest. Allow me to be "too much", but his characterization is still relatable in today's condition - human's obsession is creepier and more dangerous than ghosts. Sonu Sood is a gem and a potential on-screen villain that people love anytime.
I was impressed with the initial half of the movie which shows the villain getting his comeuppance...I felt this part was done pretty nicely even though the CGI used was lousy...
However the latter part of the movie started out bad and it was all downhill thereafter...it was as if different people had worked on different parts of the script...or else as if the scriptwriters and director were suddenly in a hurry to bring the movie to an end and sacrificed logic (& everything else)...
I can understand that certain amount of suspension of belief is necessary while watching a movie which deals with occult, reincarnation, spirits etc...but when logic flies completely out of the window and you are left with a "what the hell" feeling, there is something seriously wrong with the movie...I have read the earlier reviews which heap praise on the movie and I realise that Indian movies have a long, long way to go before they can be compared to international standards...the backbone of any movie, the plot, is so shoddy here that it would have been torn to shreds by international movie critics...
On a more positive note, the acting was pretty good, some parts of the story was fascinating & interesting and had the writer / director not been in a hurry to wrap it up, it would have been a truly awesome film...
However the latter part of the movie started out bad and it was all downhill thereafter...it was as if different people had worked on different parts of the script...or else as if the scriptwriters and director were suddenly in a hurry to bring the movie to an end and sacrificed logic (& everything else)...
I can understand that certain amount of suspension of belief is necessary while watching a movie which deals with occult, reincarnation, spirits etc...but when logic flies completely out of the window and you are left with a "what the hell" feeling, there is something seriously wrong with the movie...I have read the earlier reviews which heap praise on the movie and I realise that Indian movies have a long, long way to go before they can be compared to international standards...the backbone of any movie, the plot, is so shoddy here that it would have been torn to shreds by international movie critics...
On a more positive note, the acting was pretty good, some parts of the story was fascinating & interesting and had the writer / director not been in a hurry to wrap it up, it would have been a truly awesome film...
Compared to when this movie first came out in the year 2009, I do think that it's quite the gem.
This movie features a female lead without all of the romance. Looking at the priorities of the main lead was quite refreshing (compared to some movies where the female lead tends to rely quite a bit on the male lead).
The plot and acting of all the characters is probably one of the best. It was one of those rare times where the villain impressed me as much as the main character.
The VFX and graphics weren't as impressive but the plot and characters should be more than enough for that to be overlooked.
I would recommend watching this if you want to find an intriguing supernatural story with a fantastic female lead and villain.
This movie features a female lead without all of the romance. Looking at the priorities of the main lead was quite refreshing (compared to some movies where the female lead tends to rely quite a bit on the male lead).
The plot and acting of all the characters is probably one of the best. It was one of those rare times where the villain impressed me as much as the main character.
The VFX and graphics weren't as impressive but the plot and characters should be more than enough for that to be overlooked.
I would recommend watching this if you want to find an intriguing supernatural story with a fantastic female lead and villain.
Storyline
Did you know
- TriviaLakshmi Manchu was the initial choice to play Arundhati but could not do the project due to prior commitments.
- GoofsIn the scene where the car gets locked on railway tracks, after Anushka jumps out of the car you can see blood on her cheeks and mouth and in the immediate next shot after a few seconds you don't see blood on her face and her face looks normal.
- ConnectionsReferences House of Flying Daggers (2004)
- How long is Arundhati?Powered by Alexa
Details
Box office
- Budget
- ₹160,000,000 (estimated)
- Gross worldwide
- $4,623,138
- Runtime2 hours 11 minutes
- Color
Contribute to this page
Suggest an edit or add missing content
