Watch Now

From $2.99 (SD) on Amazon Video

ON DISC
A doctor hires an escort to seduce her husband, whom she suspects of cheating, though unforeseen events put the marriage in danger.

Director:

Writers:

(screenplay), (motion picture "Nathalie")
Reviews
Popularity
3,128 ( 317)
2 wins & 5 nominations. See more awards »

Videos

Photos

Edit

Cast

Cast overview, first billed only:
...
...
...
...
...
...
...
Receptionist
...
Bimsy
...
Alicia (as Laura De Carteret)
...
Eliza
...
Trina (as Tiffany Knight)
...
...
Waitress
Kathryn Kriitmaa ...
Waitress 2
Arlene Duncan ...
Party Guest
Edit

Storyline

Catherine and David, she a doctor, he a professor, are at first glance the perfect couple. Happily married with a talented teenage son, they appear to have an idyllic life. But when David misses a flight and his surprise birthday party, Catherine's long simmering suspicions rise to the surface. Suspecting infidelity, she decides to hire an escort to seduce her husband and test his loyalty. Catherine finds herself 'directing' Chloe's encounters with David, and Chloe's end of the bargain is to report back, the descriptions becoming increasingly graphic as the meetings multiply. Written by Anonymous

Plot Summary | Plot Synopsis

Taglines:

If the one you love was lying to you, how far would you go to find out the truth?


Motion Picture Rating (MPAA)

Rated R for strong sexual content including graphic dialogue, nudity and language | See all certifications »

Parents Guide:

 »
Edit

Details

Country:

| |

Language:

Release Date:

26 March 2010 (USA)  »

Also Known As:

O Preço da Traição  »

Filming Locations:

 »

Box Office

Budget:

$11,000,000 (estimated)

Opening Weekend:

£135,540 (UK) (5 March 2010)

Gross:

$3,074,838 (USA) (9 July 2010)
 »

Company Credits

Show detailed on  »

Technical Specs

Runtime:

Sound Mix:

Color:

Aspect Ratio:

1.85 : 1
See  »
Edit

Did You Know?

Trivia

This marks one of the very few times that Atom Egoyan did not cast his wife 'Arsinee Khanjian' in a role. See more »

Goofs

Throughout the film, Catherine receives text messages from Chloe. The dates that appear on her cell phone do not progress. One date towards the start of the film reads "March 27th," and another towards the end of the film reads "March 25th," despite that meaning time is moving backwards. See more »

Quotes

Catherine Stewart: This business transaction, which is what this was, is over!
See more »

Crazy Credits

Daniel Pellerin (with thanks for 25 years of great work, from Atom) See more »


Soundtracks

Your Rocky Spine
Written by Tony Dekker (as T. Dekker)
Performed by Great Lake Swimmers
Courtesy of Nettwerk Productions / (weewerk)
(c) 2007, T. Dekker, Harbour Songs Publishing Inc., SOCAN
See more »

Frequently Asked Questions

See more (Spoiler Alert!) »

User Reviews

 
Interesting, but not very memorable
12 August 2010 | by (Argentina) – See all my reviews

I confess that I usually find the erotic thrillers to be tedious and pretty laughable.However, there is a more "artistic" category I would call as "psico-sexual drama"; into the category, I would include films such as Closer; Eyes Wide Shut; Lust, Caution; and Crash (1996).That division is merely subjective, but I think it obeys to the obvious difference in the filmmakers' intention; let's say that while the erotic thriller simply relies on a soap-opera screenplay of passion and intrigue in order to justify the nudity from the cast, the "psico-sexual drama" is more interested in the causes of that passion and the consequences the characters suffer when they are unable to rationally control it.The film Chloe dangerously gets near the most sordid extreme from the balance, but the excellent performances and Atom Egoyan's sober direction are what rescue it.

The screenplay from Chloe is not very original, and the "surprise" revelation from the final minutes is predictable.However, the film is interesting, specially thanks to the intense work from the three main actors: the great Julianne Moore expresses the deepest emotions from her character with minimum effort and maximum impact; Liam Neeson also brings a credible and very detailed work; and Amanda Seyfried displays the big histrionic talent she could not show in crappy romantic films like Letters to Juliet and Dear John.

And besides of the performances, Egoyan drives the movie at a good rhythm and he could bring a good atmosphere to it.And I think that his work, along with the perfect performances, make Chloe to be worthy of a recommendation, despite the various fails from the screenplay and the fact of not being highly memorable.I do not think this one is among Egoyan's best films (which are, from what I have seen from his filmography and my humble point of view, Ararat and The Sweet Hereafter), but I think it is an interesting addition to his career.


16 of 26 people found this review helpful.  Was this review helpful to you?

Message Boards

Recent Posts
Fan Site jcgoodwin2
Twist ending BrianNIL25
I think Chloe wasn't lying about the husband affair. isefmert29
The "how do you do this?" monologue Wilde_child
Breakaway Window/Wall simpledays
Did the husband cheat? e-stefanopoulos
Discuss Chloe (2009) on the IMDb message boards »

Contribute to This Page

Create a character page for:
?