Call of Duty: World at War (2008)

Video Game  |  Action, Horror, War  |  11 November 2008 (USA)
Your rating:
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 -/10 X  
Ratings: 8.3/10 from 6,143 users  
Reviews: 13 user | 2 critic

An epic story of an American marine and a Soviet soldier in the WWII.



(battle chatter), , 1 more credit »
0Check in

IMDb Picks: April

Visit our IMDb Picks section to see our recommendations of movies and TV shows coming out in April.

User Lists

Related lists from IMDb users

list image
a list of 33 titles
created 15 Apr 2012
a list of 24 titles
created 23 Apr 2012
a list of 25 titles
created 10 Jun 2012
a list of 47 titles
created 02 Dec 2012
a list of 30 titles
created 1 month ago

Related Items

Connect with IMDb

Share this Rating

Title: Call of Duty: World at War (Video Game 2008)

Call of Duty: World at War (Video Game 2008) on IMDb 8.3/10

Want to share IMDb's rating on your own site? Use the HTML below.

Take The Quiz!

Test your knowledge of Call of Duty: World at War.

User Polls



Cast overview, first billed only:
Sgt. Reznov (voice)
Sgt. Roebuck (voice)
Craig Houston ...
Private Chernov (voice)
Sgt. Sullivan (voice)
Yoshi Tomo Kaneda ...
Japanese Soldier (voice) (as Akira Kaneda)
Hiro Abe ...
US Soldier (voice)
Keith Ferguson ...
US Soldier (voice)
Jacob Cipes ...
US Soldier (voice)
Russian Soldier (voice)
Russian Soldier (voice)


An epic story of an American marine and a Soviet soldier in the WWII.

Plot Summary | Add Synopsis


Action | Horror | War


M | See all certifications »

Parents Guide:



Official Sites:



Release Date:

11 November 2008 (USA)  »

Also Known As:

Call of Duty 5  »

Company Credits

Production Co:

,  »
Show detailed on  »

Technical Specs


See  »

Did You Know?


This is not only the second time Gary Oldman has played a part in a World War 2-era video game, but it is also the second time that he's played a Russian character since Air Force One (1997). See more »


When the time comes to choose to save either Roebuck or Polonsky, no matter who is killed, the dog tags Miller receives at the end of the battle bear Roebuck's name. See more »


Sgt. Reznov: Mark my words, comrade... one day things will change.
See more »


Follows Call of Duty: Finest Hour (2004) See more »

Frequently Asked Questions

See more (Spoiler Alert!) »

User Reviews

Worst multiplayer Call of Duty ever
21 July 2010 | by (Netherlands) – See all my reviews

I'm going to start of by saying that I liked the singleplayer-campaign for Call of Duty: World at War. Not that its anything special, but its nice to shoot your way through the campaign. Its your average World War 2 shootinggame. The multiplayer however, is by far the worst Call of Duty experience I have had.

The weapons in multiplayer are unbalanced to say the least. With some weapons you need to fire so many bullets into your opponent its ridiculous. Even in hardcore-mode (where the weapons have more 'realistic' firepower) this is unbalanced. Using your knife as a melee- attack in multiplayer is also completely useless. Usually when you try to knife your opponent your character does this weird 'jump attack' towards your enemy, and I guarantee that this move will nearly always get you killed instead. Sometimes you can even hear your knife striking the enemy, but you still end up dying. What the hell is that all about?? Its also very easy to get stuck in the scenery or behind objects, which happened to me more then just a couple of times. Bugs like these ruin what could have potentially been a good multiplayer-experience.

The biggest saving grace for me personally, is the Nazi-zombies mode. If it wasn't for this I would have quit playing this game a long time ago. This mode is unlocked once you complete the singleplayer-campaign, and I have to say its a lot of fun. The premise is that you and up to four buddies mow down waves after waves of zombies, while preventing them to get inside by bolting windows shut which gives you points. Shooting a zombie will also get you points of course (extra for headshots) which you can use to purchase weapons. You and your companions are destined to die from the beginning since the waves of zombies are never-ending, but the question is: how long can you survive? Even though many 'elite' Call of Duty players will probably don't like the Nazi-zombies mode, I think its a refreshing experience in what otherwise would have been a boring, buggy and overall flawed shootinggame. If you play Nazi-zombies with three friends online it will make for a chaotic and intense game of shooting zombies.

Would I recommend buying this game for the Nazi-zombies mode alone? Not really. If you don't count the average singleplayer-campaign it doesn't have much else to offer. The regular multiplayer with team deathmatch and similar modes will drive you insane with all the little bugs and glitches that it has. In that aspect Modern Warfare 2 does a much better job. Still, if you can get this game at a store for just a few Euro's then it might be worth checking out. I really hope that developer Treyarch will get their act together and deliver a well-programmed game with the upcoming Call of Duty game Black Ops. Until then, have fun shooting zombies!

0 of 0 people found this review helpful.  Was this review helpful to you?

Message Boards

Recent Posts
Die, Treyarch, die slow.. jinxta
Going back to CoD 4 racer25j
Gore or no gore? ryans_olson
New Weapon?? Garshaw
MP40 optimusprimetime
Discuss Call of Duty: World at War (2008) on the IMDb message boards »

Contribute to This Page