Lost Tapes (2008– )

TV Series  -   -  Horror | Mystery | Sci-Fi
6.3
Your rating:
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 -/10 X  
Ratings: 6.3/10 from 539 users  
Reviews: 6 user | 2 critic

Add a Plot

0Check in
0Share...

User Lists

Related lists from IMDb users

a list of 40 titles
created 28 Oct 2011
 
a list of 27 titles
created 01 May 2012
 
a list of 26 titles
created 27 Aug 2012
 
a list of 39 titles
created 10 Feb 2013
 
a list of 46 titles
created 5 days ago
 

Related Items

Search for "Lost Tapes" on Amazon.com

Connect with IMDb


Share this Rating

Title: Lost Tapes (2008– )

Lost Tapes (2008– ) on IMDb 6.3/10

Want to share IMDb's rating on your own site? Use the HTML below.

Take The Quiz!

Test your knowledge of Lost Tapes.

Season:

3 | 2 | 1 | unknown

Year:

2013 | 2010 | 2009 | 2008

Videos

Photos

Edit

Cast

Series cast summary:
Loren Coleman ...
 Himself - Cryptozoologist (12 episodes, 2009-2010)
Dallas Tanner ...
 Himself - Author, The Cryptids Trilogy / ... (12 episodes, 2009-2010)
Jessica Lynch Alfaro ...
 Herself - Biological Anthropologist / ... (12 episodes, 2009-2010)
Craig Stanford ...
 Himself - Biological Anthropologist (11 episodes, 2009-2010)
Joe Nickell ...
 Himself - Skeptical Inquirer Magazine / ... (11 episodes, 2009-2010)
Rosemary Ellen Guiley ...
 Herself - Author & Paranormal Investigator / ... (8 episodes, 2009-2010)
Linda S. Godfrey ...
 Herself - Author & Researcher (6 episodes, 2010)
Michael E. Alfaro ...
 Himself - Evolutionary Biologist (5 episodes, 2009)
Edit

Storyline

Add Full Plot | Add Synopsis


Edit

Details

Official Sites:

Country:

Language:

Release Date:

30 October 2008 (USA)  »

Company Credits

Production Co:

 »
Show detailed on  »

Technical Specs

Color:

See  »

Frequently Asked Questions

This FAQ is empty. Add the first question.

User Reviews

 
A refreshing change of pace.
14 February 2009 | by (United States) – See all my reviews

Cryptozoology shows all have one thing in common: they don't have results. If they did, we'd have heard about it on the news long before the show could air. Instead, we get 'the best evidence out there' in some and absolutely nothing in others. As viewers, we can't hold it too much against them, it's an integral part of any field science. Even creatures that don't suffer from the 'they probably don't exist' problem can prove elusive.

I love shows like Monster Quest, Destination Truth, and Animal X. They appeal to the truly scientific side of me that hears the evidence and assigns probabilities, but there are only so many times they can scan Loch Ness. There are only so many bear footprints I can look at with the question 'was it Bigfoot'? Then, Animal Planet brought us Lost Tapes, a horror show with a cryptozoology theme.

Lost Tapes is about as academic as an episode of The X-Files. Instead of creating a show to please skeptics, it's more or less straight horror. It makes no claims that anything it has are real, doesn't expect us to believe anything about it. It frees them from having to give us the most credible critters out there. In fact, it frees them from *everything*. Instead, they can just make a show, and not another one where the *same* evidence is run over again and again without any conclusion. The science only invades the show long enough to explain the plot. Lost Tapes does not appeal to the same side as MonsterQuest, it appeals to the side of me that watches horror movies.

Lost Tapes suffers from a few problems. The acting isn't always great, the stock sounds can get a little tedious, the obsession with never allowing a clear shot of the monster of the day (see below) can often lead to some hilariously bad special effects. It's very, *very* clear that the show was shot without any budget to speak of.

On the other hand, given what they have to work with, it's very well done. Comparing the show to the Blair Witch Project is unfair. That movie was missing the whole 'scary' part, whereas this is not (some people actually *complain* that it's too scary...). The director understands that the more time a creature spends in camera, the less threatening it is (you get a maximum of one or two fuzzy glances per show). The show also does a good job of making the characters behave realistically. The Mexicans in the Chupacabra episode speak almost exclusively Spanish, the woman coming upon the remains of the beast's last kill says 'I'm going to leave this to the authorities!'.

Animal Planet would be wise to give them more money and resources to work with. It would be great if, for example, a few film crews found themselves falling victim to the nasty critters.

If you're a big skeptic looking for a highly scientific show, don't bother with this one. If you're into horror, this show is for you. I advise even the most die-hard skeptics to watch it the way they watch the X-Files (I remember *it's* first season special effects as being bad too). Despite its many flaws, this show blew me away.

Let's hope it's not too good to last.


15 of 25 people found this review helpful.  Was this review helpful to you?

Message Boards

Recent Posts
is this real? Airball1313
Footage? Mtch34
To those who think it's real metredgui
Why Animal Planet??????? howard_w13
I don't care how cheap this show is willow-tree93
Looking for something a bit similar GiantPlum
Discuss Lost Tapes (2008) on the IMDb message boards »

Contribute to This Page