Deadliest Warrior (2009– )

TV Series  -   -  Action | Game-Show | History
Your rating:
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 -/10 X  
Ratings: 7.7/10 from 2,406 users  
Reviews: 26 user | 6 critic

The great warriors of history are examined for fantasy combat simulations.

0Check in

Editors' Spotlight

Unbroken: An interview with Angelina Jolie

IMDb's Arno Kazarian chats with Angelina Jolie about working with cinematographer Roger Deakins and harnessing Jack O'Connell's fire

Related News

Indie Spotlight
| DailyDead

User Lists

Related lists from IMDb users

a list of 35 titles
created 20 Jul 2011
a list of 39 titles
created 20 Nov 2011
a list of 31 titles
created 27 Nov 2011
a list of 29 titles
created 19 Dec 2013
a list of 32 titles
created 6 months ago

Related Items

Connect with IMDb

Share this Rating

Title: Deadliest Warrior (2009– )

Deadliest Warrior (2009– ) on IMDb 7.7/10

Want to share IMDb's rating on your own site? Use the HTML below.

Take The Quiz!

Test your knowledge of Deadliest Warrior.

User Polls




Unknown   3   2   1  
Unknown   2011   2010   2009  



Learn more

People who liked this also liked... 

FutureWeapons (TV Series 2006)
Documentary | Action | Crime
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 7.8/10 X  
Stars: Richard Machowicz
Human Weapon (TV Series 2007)
Documentary | Drama | Sport
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 8.4/10 X  
Stars: Jason Chambers, Bill Duff, Cung Le
Ultimate Soldier Challenge (TV Series 2013)
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 7.4/10 X  
Stars: Richard Machowicz, Nicholas Dombey, Leo Pavlushkin
Fight Science (TV Series 2008)
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 7.9/10 X  
Stars: Robert Leigh, Bren Foster, Cynthia Bir
American Gladiators (1989–1997)
Action | Game-Show | Sport
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 6.7/10 X  

The teams compete in such events as Power Ball, Assault, The Wall and Hang Tough. The Eliminator round decides the winner of the tournament.

Stars: Mike Adamle, Jim Starr, Raye Hollitt
Ultimate Weapons (TV Series 2009)
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 7.5/10 X  
Stars: D.C. Douglas
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 6.6/10 X  
Stars: Wil Willis, Iyad Hajjaj, Fouad Hajji
1000 Ways to Die (TV Series 2008)
Comedy | Drama | Horror
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 7.2/10 X  

Several different deaths based on true stories.

Stars: Alisdair Simpson, Ron Perlman, Khyber Zaffarkhan
Fear Factor I (TV Series 2001)
Game-Show | Reality-TV | Thriller
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 5.5/10 X  

In each pulse-racing "Fear Factor" episode, contestants (sometimes solo, often paired with spouses, siblings or best friends) recruited from across the nation must decide if they have the ... See full summary »

Stars: Joe Rogan, Todd Staples, Jon Dalton
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 5.6/10 X  
Directors: Hamish Hamilton, Alisa Chieves, and 6 more credits »
Stars: Neil Patrick Harris, Tony Hawk, Michael Chiklis
Fight Quest (TV Series 2007)
Reality-TV | Sport
    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 8.2/10 X  
Stars: Douglass Anderson, Jimmy Smith, Rickson Gracie


Series cast summary:
 Himself - Host / ... (33 episodes, 2009-2011)
Armand Dorian ...
 Himself / ... (29 episodes, 2009-2011)
Max Geiger ...
 Himself - Computer Programmer / ... (23 episodes, 2009-2010)


Throughout history, there have been great warriors who have made their mark in battle, but how they could have matched up against each other is a mystery. This series endeavors to solve that mystery with various matchups of such warrior classes. With a systematic examination of their physical and cultural qualities, training and weapons, a field of experts strive to find the real facts of such warriors. When the research is compete, each episode ends with a simulated battle to see who is truly the deadliest warrior. Written by Kenneth Chisholm (

Plot Summary | Add Synopsis


No rules, no safety, no mercy. It's a duel to the death. See more »

Parents Guide:





Release Date:

10 March 2009 (USA)  »

Also Known As:

El guerrero más letal  »

Filming Locations:

Company Credits

Show detailed on  »

Technical Specs



Sound Mix:


Aspect Ratio:

1.78 : 1
See  »

Did You Know?


[repeated line]
Narrator: Who will be the deadliest warrior?
See more »


Remade as Deadliest Warrior See more »

Frequently Asked Questions

This FAQ is empty. Add the first question.

User Reviews

Action heavy, logic lapsed
20 May 2009 | by (United States) – See all my reviews

I must first say about this series that the premise is outstanding, and one that has crossed my mind on numerous occasions. What would happen if a medieval knight met up with a samurai? Who would be victorious in battle?

The show then attempts to determine whom is the better warrior amongst two different kinds in history - in many cases two warriors that are separated by many centuries. The arms and armors available to these warriors are demonstrated, both in their lethal potential or in their stopping power in the case of armor. The demonstrations are fascinating, including weapons experts that strike or fire their weapons at ballistics gel encased, and presumably reproduction skeletons. A physician or medical specialist then examines the footage, or the dummy in some cases, and describes the type of trauma inflicted. At the end, we get a well choreographed fight between two re-enactors dressed in costume to simulate the potential outcome of such a contest, as well as a statistics model that determines the winner in 1,000 contests. I like this concept because despite the advantages a particular warrior might possess over another, the randomness of combat will ensure that even the presumably better warrior will lose at least a percentage of the time.

The problems with the show are many, however, and seriously challenge the credibility of the participants. As others have pointed out, a warrior is more than the sum of his weapons and armor, which the show spends the most amount of time demonstrating. I think the premise could be dropped and have the show focus on weapons demonstrations only. Although the mindset, culture, tactics, and goals of each warrior are mentioned, these descriptions are brief and superficial. In addition,the hypothetical combats displayed are all duels. Most of the warriors portrayed would rarely, if ever, be faced with a duel situation, instead fighting in a unit of many soldiers/warriors. The worst part for me has to be the banter or trash talk between the weapons experts representing each respective warrior. It reminds me of a WWE matchup or a pre-boxing/MMA trash session instead of a presumably serious and/or scientific look at a hypothetical combat situation.

At any rate, I do enjoy the show because it has many good aspects. But the flaws do not make for "must-see" TV. If they would focus a little more on the tactics, drop the banter, and perhaps consider tactical unit combat instead of duels, I believe the show would be much improved. The producers are obviously trying to cater to a younger, action thirsty crowd, perhaps in an effort to make history more interesting. I applaud this rationale if nothing else, but the more discriminating viewers with a desire for logical and factual history, such as myself, are often left wanting.

If any wish for a superior show with similarities to DW, check out an earlier History Channel series called "Conquest" with Peter Woodward. The latter is more mature, yet still with some light hearted moments. It covers nearly every criticism I have for DW and then some (see my review).

EDIT: I had not seen Season 3 prior to this original review, and S3 does cover some of my criticisms for the first two Seasons. The banter here has been toned down substantially and the combats all consist of units fighting each other. The warrior's mindsets, values, and motivations are explored with the addition of Richard Machowicz. I also liked the addition of the "X Factors" as well, or somewhat intangible characteristics such as mental health or physical fitness which could positively or negatively impact a side's performance. Overall the changes added a more serious and scientific component to the show that was a substantial improvement IMO.

There are still a few problems that I saw, particularly with the tendency to match two opponents who were not a very good matchup to begin with. Hannibal and Genghis Khan was a good example, as they were separated by nearly 1,400 years and Khan's armor and weapons technology was far superior. Same could be said of William the Conqueror and Joan of Arc. It was a little silly to see a unit of five men firing a heavy artillery piece at each other as well. The elite modern soldiers did not have weapons that they most likely would have carried. I am particularly thinking about the Rangers/North Korea and Gurkha/French Foreign Legion in that all these soldiers would have probably carried hand grenades and a pistol of some kind. Roosevelt/Lawrence of Arabia or even Washington/Napolean would have probably had pistols as well. Oddly enough, only Pancho Villa/Crazy Horse were depicted carrying pistols.

In general, the format changes in S3 were an improvement and I enjoyed it quite a bit more than the previous seasons.

37 of 47 people found this review helpful.  Was this review helpful to you?

Message Boards

Recent Posts
Spiderman vs Batman chrisxg1
Gorilla vs. Lion blackflagsunrise
DC comics vs. Marvel comics. christi772010
More ideas for Season 4 if there is one. ironhorse_iv
Cancelled Deccomajor
Here is a good match up if there is a season 4 ironhorse_iv
Discuss Deadliest Warrior (2009) on the IMDb message boards »

Contribute to This Page