IMDb > "The Genius of Charles Darwin" (2008)

"The Genius of Charles Darwin" (2008) More at IMDbPro »TV series 2008-

Photos (See all 4 | slideshow)


User Rating:
8.6/10   607 votes »
Your Rating:
Saving vote...
Deleting vote...
/10   (delete | history)
Sorry, there was a problem
MOVIEmeter: ?
Down 33% in popularity this week. See why on IMDbPro.
Richard Dawkins (writer)
View company contact information for The Genius of Charles Darwin on IMDbPro.
Release Date:
4 August 2008 (UK) See more »
1 win See more »
User Reviews:
Clumsy rhetoric from smart scientist See more (6 total) »


 (Series Cast Summary - 1 of 3)
Richard Dawkins ... Richard Dawkins (unknown episodes)

Series Directed by
Russell Barnes (unknown episodes)
Series Writing credits
Richard Dawkins (unknown episodes)

Series Produced by
Russell Barnes .... producer (unknown episodes)
Ursula Riley .... archive producer (unknown episodes)
Series Original Music by
Paul Thomson (unknown episodes)
Series Film Editing by
Matt Platts-Mills (unknown episodes)
Series Sound Department
Malcolm McGeorge .... dubbing mixer (3 episodes, 2008)
Series Other crew
Henrietta Mitchell .... researcher (3 episodes, 2008)

Production CompaniesDistributors

Additional Details

Also Known As:
UK:60 min


This FAQ is empty. Add the first question.
14 out of 68 people found the following review useful.
Clumsy rhetoric from smart scientist, 12 December 2008
Author: Anders from Sweden

As someone incredibly smart and constantly pondering the apparent clash between faith and science, I should be the perfect viewer for this. Alas, it seems I am too smart...

First off, the score (4) is a verdict on the series, not on the merits of prof. Dawkins as a scientist - he is obviously at the top of his field. Would that he would stay in it. For this supposed celebration of Charles Darwin actually has more important goals:

1) To present not Darwin but Dawkins, the clever but not heartless - Heaven forfend! - thinker. The man on a Lifelong Quest for truth, who unflinchingly faces the implications that scientific truth casts before us. The series is filled with images of him walking, talking, facing the camera or gazing elsewhere. And, more often than not, scowling at the disturbing fact that not everyone is as rational as he. Frankly, ought the title of the series to have been changed?

2) To once and for all establish the indisputable fact that religion is always wrong and can at best be tolerated - if it doesn't interfere with science. Dawkins has never made his impatience with religious belief a secret and this is yet another bout in the boxing ring, intended to provide the definitive knockout.

It fails in both regards. While comfortably at home in the science lab or when summing up his evidence, Dawkins seems almost childlike when trying to describe the belief in Something More, rigidly unable to look past the scornful caricature he prefers. He also, for some reason, resorts to cheap tricks. This is annoyingly obvious in the "confrontations" where he either takes on lightweights who are easily dismissed (in the poorest Penn and Teller Bullsh*t tradition) or, when talking to someone actually able to speak for themselves, he (or the producer) feels impelled to fade out the answers and superimpose Dawkins's own comments in a self-congratulating voice-over. It's so clumsy that he looks as if he has something to hide. He probably doesn't, he just has no patience with those who disagree with him and seems less curious in other viewpoints than eager to shoot them down and swiftly move on.

The most important definition of a scientist is the thirst for knowledge, but when it comes to faith Dawkins is absolutely certain that he has nothing more of value to learn. He would hardly dispute this statement, but it makes this "quest" seem as labored as a morality play. His guests are there to prove his point, whether or not they agree with him.

He is, in short, just as confrontational as Michael Moore taking on a favorite cause, but with this difference: he has no sense of humor. When he dryly describes the enormous empathy he feels for others when they suffer, the effect is rather comical but surely unintended.

Let's face it: religion has survived Darwin's evolution for a very long time. If he actually means to dismantle it, he will have to come up with something better than this half-assed diatribe.

That said, the parts about Darwin himself are interesting. Perhaps there should have been more in that vein. What with the title and all...

Was the above review useful to you?
See more (6 total) »

Message Boards

Discuss this movie with other users on IMDb message board for "The Genius of Charles Darwin" (2008)


If you enjoyed this title, our database also recommends:
- - - - -
Jesus Camp Religulous The Most Hated Family in America Louis Theroux: The Most Hated Family in America in Crisis The Eyes of Tammy Faye
IMDb User Rating:
IMDb User Rating:
IMDb User Rating:
IMDb User Rating:
IMDb User Rating:
Show more recommendations

Related Links

Episode guide Full cast and crew Company credits
External reviews IMDb TV section IMDb Documentary section
IMDb UK section

You may report errors and omissions on this page to the IMDb database managers. They will be examined and if approved will be included in a future update. Clicking the 'Edit page' button will take you through a step-by-step process.

You may add a new episode for this TV series by clicking the 'add episode' button