"Criminal Minds" House on Fire (TV Episode 2009) Poster

(TV Series)

(2009)

User Reviews

Review this title
4 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
7/10
Sins of Omission
ttapola7 November 2010
Having one's episode to follow an instant classic like "Omnivore" must have been viewed as a no-win situation. Network shows that have 20+ episodes per year have a tight filming schedule, so multiple scripts are being written simultaneously and the episodes might even be filmed in different order than broadcast. In any case, one sympathizes with the writer and director of this otherwise worthy episode.

There is a lot to recommend this episode: great concept, excellent guest roles from some of the best supporting actors around, Michael Rooker, who's proved he's more than just Henry, and Sam Anderson, probably best known as Bernard from Lost, but a familiar face to practically everyone who watches TV. And while the word 'recommend' feels uneasy when applied to the scene that *will* linger in your mind like a similar scene in Se7en (I won't spoil it), it means the creators have achieved something memorable. Reduced to its core idea, the back-story of the arsonist is ripped straight out of real world, which makes it all the more frightening and thought-provoking. It is even voiced out by Reid at three quarters into the episode.

However, this episode is also written straight into the Criminal Minds mold that gets pretty distracting and downright insulting when forced upon the viewer the umpteenth time: Needless editing tricks, scenes of the killer shot out of focus, overlays of the events upon the BAU agents at the scene of said event, lectures given to the local police - all these could be at least used more sparingly, and in the case of the overlays, eliminated entirely, because unintentional as it may be, showing what happened earlier while simultaneously showing the agents explaining what happened is insulting the audience's intelligence. Less is more. The writers and directors need look no further than the classic episodes of this very series. This could have been a 8/10 (clichés in the story out-ruling a 9/10), now it's "just" 7/10 (still very good).
20 out of 21 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Disturbing
TheLittleSongbird25 January 2017
As said a few times, Season 4 is a strong contender for the best season of 'Criminal Minds'. One where the lesser episodes, such as "Demonology" and "Catching Out", are still better than the worst episodes of particularly Seasons 9 and 11, and where there are so many classic episodes that picking a favourite is like trying to say what your favourite ice cream flavour is.

"House on Fire" is not quite up there as a classic, and is not quite as good as the near-elite previous episode "Omnivore", but is a solid and actually very good episode. Do have a preference for the serial killer plots of 'Criminal Minds', tending to in general not find stories based around arson attacks not quite as interesting, this said "House on Fire" manages to make a compelling, emotional and disturbing episode out of this type of story.

There is not much wrong here. Some of the "tricks" in the editing didn't add as much as they could have done, a few unneeded, and there is the slight sense that the first appearance of Tina gives away a little too much.

On the other hand, some editing aside, "House on Fire" is again a well made 'Criminal Minds' episode, stylishly photographed and atmospheric. The music has the right amount of haunting mood and the odd bouts of melancholy.

Writing is tightly structured and thought-provoking, with all the classic writing ingredients for 'Criminal Minds' there, with the chemistry between Hotch and Garcia being particularly striking. The story is absorbing, with all the twists and turns making sense and wrapped up neatly (without being too much so), with a good deal to feel emotional over and some disturbing scenes.

Regarding the disturbing scenes, this is particularly true of the opening scene, so harrowing that one may be put off from setting foot in a cinema for a while, and the shocking backstory of the unsub. Loved what was done with Garcia here, she takes on a different and bigger role and proves herself essential to solving the case and we see a more flawed and vulnerable side that comes over with a lot of realism.

As to be expected, the acting is very good. Kirsten Vangsness is outstanding here, while Michael Rooker proves to be great casting with a performance to match.

Overall, a disturbing and very well done episode. 8/10 Bethany Cox
8 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Not like all CM episodes
artybookworm11 May 2018
Warning: Spoilers
I love Criminal Minds, unfortunately, this was a terrible episode. What made it so terrible? Garcia. It was not realistic at all, even for tv standards. Garcia is just the tech woman, that's all she is. She can't profile people, that's what the team of real profilers do, and that's what I want to see on CM. I also find Garcia extremely annoying. She's becoming, episode after episode, a caricature of herself. What was "cute" in the first season, it's ridicule in the following seasons. I think the writers wanted her to be like that science girl from NCIS, but they couldn't. The actress that plays Garcia is great, she does what she is asked for, but her character is unwatchable. This is why this episode is only 2 stars for me. This was the show of Garcia doing the show of others. If the writers wanted an episode about her, they should have written something that revolves around her world and not the team's world.
7 out of 28 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Do the writers hate the FBI?
knroc31 August 2019
Like most shows, the writers depend on viewers suspending belief on a few things. I wonder if it bothers Kirsten Vangsness that her character is totally unbelievable? Normally 90 percent of the information she imparts couldn't/wouldn't be computerized. But this episode takes it over the top. Student records have been protected by FERPA since the 70's. Medical records have been protected by HIPPA since the 90's. It would require a court order to gain access. But Garcia hacks into schools and hospitals at will getting information on everyone without regard to due process. The writers must want us to believe that the FBI is big brother or that they just want to show the FBI as an institution that will break any law they feel like to catch the bad guy. Either way the FBI is to be feared, not respected.
8 out of 35 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed