Lucky Luke (2009) 4.7
Fearless gunslinger, Lucky Luke, is ordered by the President to bring peace to Daisy Town. Director:James Huth |
|
| 0Share... |
Lucky Luke (2009) 4.7
Fearless gunslinger, Lucky Luke, is ordered by the President to bring peace to Daisy Town. Director:James Huth |
|
| 0Share... |
| Cast overview, first billed only: | |||
| Jean Dujardin | ... | ||
| Michaël Youn | ... | ||
| Sylvie Testud | ... | ||
|
|
Daniel Prévost | ... |
Pat Poker
|
| Alexandra Lamy | ... | ||
| Melvil Poupaud | ... | ||
|
|
Jean-François Balmer | ... |
Le gouverneur
|
|
|
André Oumansky | ... |
President
|
|
|
Gabriel Corrado | ... |
Luke's Father
|
|
|
Pompeyo Audivert | ... |
Undertaker
|
|
|
Atilio Pozzobon | ... |
Barman
|
|
|
Alberto Laiseca | ... | |
|
|
Mathias Sandor | ... | |
|
|
Carolina Presno | ... |
Luke's Mother
|
|
|
Carlos Kaspar | ... |
Hank
|
Fearless gunslinger, Lucky Luke, is ordered by the President to bring peace to Daisy Town.
The script of the first Astérix movie combined elements from a few different books and it wasn't very successful. Then came the second, which was based in a single book. This was by far the best Astérix movie. The third one was based on one of the books but had a lot of extra stuff thrown in there, and it resulted in a resounding failure. What conclusion can be drawn from this? That you should just trust Goscinny, who was a great writer, and keep your film as close as possible to his material. With this "Lucky Luke" film they picked characters and plot elements from a dozen different books, and the resulting screenplay was a huge mess.
I still enjoyed it, but I think it could have been much better.