IMDb > Rage (2009/I)
Rage
Quicklinks
Top Links
trailers and videosfull cast and crewtriviaofficial sitesmemorable quotes
Overview
main detailscombined detailsfull cast and crewcompany credits
Awards & Reviews
user reviewsexternal reviewsawardsuser ratingsparents guidemessage board
Plot & Quotes
plot summarysynopsisplot keywordsmemorable quotes
Did You Know?
triviagoofssoundtrack listingcrazy creditsalternate versionsmovie connectionsFAQ
Other Info
box office/businessrelease datesfilming locationstechnical specsliterature listingsNewsDesk
Promotional
taglines trailers and videos posters photo gallery
External Links
showtimesofficial sitesmiscellaneousphotographssound clipsvideo clips

Rage (2009/I) More at IMDbPro »

Photos (See all 8 | slideshow)

Overview

User Rating:
4.7/10   836 votes »
Your Rating:
Saving vote...
Deleting vote...
/10   (delete | history)
Sorry, there was a problem
MOVIEmeter: ?
No change in popularity this week. See why on IMDbPro.
Director:
Writer:
Sally Potter (written by)
Contact:
View company contact information for Rage on IMDbPro.
Genre:
Tagline:
Shot...on cellphone
Plot:
A young blogger at a New York fashion house shoots behind-the-scenes interviews on his cell-phone. | Add synopsis »
Awards:
1 nomination See more »
NewsDesk:
(81 articles)
10 Male Actors In Drag Who Will Sexually Confuse You
 (From Obsessed with Film. 24 October 2014, 11:58 AM, PDT)

I was obsessed with movies: Jude Law
 (From RealBollywood. 6 October 2013, 12:55 AM, PDT)

Full line-up for the BFI London Film Festival announced
 (From Flickeringmyth. 4 September 2013, 11:03 PM, PDT)

User Reviews:
Very flawed but much better than people give it credit for See more (13 total) »

Cast

 

Directed by
Sally Potter 
 
Writing credits
(in alphabetical order)
Sally Potter  written by

Produced by
Andrew Fierberg .... producer
Bob Hiestand .... executive producer
Michael Manzi .... line producer
Jenny Schweitzer .... line producer
Christopher Sheppard .... producer
Christina Weiss Lurie .... executive producer
 
Original Music by
Fred Frith 
Sally Potter 
 
Cinematography by
Steven Fierberg 
 
Film Editing by
Daniel Goddard 
 
Casting by
Irene Lamb 
Heidi Levitt 
 
Costume Design by
Marina Draghici 
 
Makeup Department
Leo Won .... department head makeup: new york
 
Production Management
Angela C. Lee .... production manager
 
Sound Department
James Corless .... sound mix technician
Tom Deane .... adr mixer
Daniel Goddard .... sound editor
Jean-Paul Mugel .... sound
Ruth Sullivan .... foley artist
Vincent Tulli .... sound mixer
Keith Partridge .... foley engineer (uncredited)
 
Camera and Electrical Department
Jimmy Barnett .... digital imaging technician (as James Barnett)
Sally Potter .... camera operator
 
Casting Department
Urvashi Chugani .... casting associate
Lauren Fernandes .... casting associate
 
Costume and Wardrobe Department
Sophie Canale .... costume trainee
Hiromi Sano .... costume assistant: UK unit
David Harry Yoon .... costume assistant (as David Yoon)
 
Editorial Department
Serge Anthony .... colorist
Jimmy Barnett .... assistant editor (as James Barnett)
François Dupuy .... technical manager: digimage
 
Other crew
Doug Lenox .... production assistant
David Mandel .... production coordinator
George Mitchell .... production assistant: London
James Morrison .... key production assistant
Henry Prince .... assistant: Andrew Fierberg
Isabella Wing-Davey .... production assistant: UK
 

Production CompaniesDistributorsOther Companies

Additional Details

Also Known As:
Runtime:
98 min | Germany:99 min (Berlin International Film Festival)
Country:
Language:
Color:
Aspect Ratio:
1.85 : 1 See more »
Certification:

Did You Know?

Trivia:
For her role as Mona, Judi Dench had to learn how to roll and smoke a spliff (joint with marijuana and tobacco).See more »
Quotes:
Miss Roth:I do believe that life will become difficult for some people in this country in the near future. Indeed.
[listens to the shouts and taunts of people outside]
Miss Roth:It already is difficult and that's what the people outside... yes, that's what they're protesting about.
See more »

FAQ

This FAQ is empty. Add the first question.
5 out of 10 people found the following review useful.
Very flawed but much better than people give it credit for, 3 January 2011
Author: Terrell Howell (KnightsofNi11) from United States

So it's no secret that experimental filmmaking is a necessity of cinema and some experimental films succeed and others don't. Rage is one of those that doesn't quite succeed in its experimentation on narrative style. Rage is about a New York blogger named Michelangelo, a character we never see or hear. Michelangelo is documenting a New York fashion show by interviewing various people behind the stage in front of various neon colored backgrounds. The entire film is just individual character interviews intertwined to create a story. There is no character interaction and no sets whatsoever. The entire film is done with actors, sound effects, and a blue screen. And believe it or not, the film does actually end up telling a cohesive story, just in the most inconvenient way possible.

Simply put, you can't tell a story like this. You just can't make this kind of narrative work without some extra flair or nuance to spice it up. You simply can't tell a unique enough story with just actors in front of a blue screen. The film, for the most part, kept my attention the whole way through, but it is not something that I would watch repeatedly. It is good for one viewing, and the most you can take out of that one viewing is that this is a narrative style that just doesn't work. This film could make an interesting contemporary stage play with a few tweaks, but as a film it is missing key elements that make cinema what it is. I commend Sally Potter, the director, for coming up with new and inventive ways to tell a story through the film medium and I would never discourage her from continuing to expand her experimentation, but I do hope she realized that this attempt was a failed one.

Moving on from the narrative style, I really can't complain about the story itself or the characters within it. That is really the tragedy of this film is how much potential its story and characters could have had, if told in a more effective manner. The story takes unexpected twists throughout, and grows surprisingly dark and captivating. Each character is very well designed, but you have to take into consideration the fact that we only see a small part of each character's potential. Like I said before, there is zero character interaction in this film unless you count the things said directly to our invisible narrator. It is difficult to fully judge a character's depth when you never see him or her interact with the other characters of the film. But for what we are given by these characters, it is all very interesting. Each character has their own philosophy and outlook on life and the fashion industry, and these personal values each one of them expresses drives the story home. A lot could have been done with what was laid out across the screen, but the over experimental narrative style held it back significantly.

And to add insult to injury, the characters were played by excellent actors who I would have loved to see go further with their roles if the narrative had allowed for it. There are some very big names in this film and a variety of A-list faces. There is everyone from Steve Buscemi as the disgruntled photographer, to the kind old Dianne Wiest who wants her perfume company to succeed, but also wants to keep everyone happy. Jude Law goes the extra mile for this film and plays the transsexual runway model Minx. It is one of the most enticing yet disturbing roles in the whole film, and Law does a great job. Judi Dench plays a painfully honest fashion critic, who delivers one of the last and most enthralling speeches of the film. She ends the film on a particularly dark, yet fascinating note and her performance is great for what she has to work with.

I see this film getting torn up by critics and audience members alike, but I feel it deserves much more credit than it has received. Obviously it is very flawed, but it is not an outright horrible movie. The narrative style simply doesn't work and it definitely holds the film back a lot, but apart from that the film delivers a lot of good things. The story, while not perfect, is undeniably interesting, and so are the characters. The actors do a great job in their limiting roles and the only complaint I can make about them is that I just wanted more. Overall, Rage is a failure in minimalist filmmaking. The film makes numerous references to Andy Warhol, but I'm sure Warhol would have been disgusted by this film, as its style almost ended up being a mockery of his own, unintentionally of course. With a lot of tweaking and revising, though, Rage could be a great film or even stage play that would most definitely be worth watching.

Was the above review useful to you?
See more (13 total) »

Message Boards

Discuss this movie with other users on IMDb message board for Rage (2009)
Recent Posts (updated daily)User
Is Rage viewable? lenscap1
THIS FILM IS ABOUT THE WORST THING I'VE EVER SEEN Lemmywinks616
Stephen King book? pritchardtr
What is it with most of you? patty84
Why 2001 kathyperry2010
more than total s..t!!! amag7
See more »

Recommendations

If you enjoyed this title, our database also recommends:
- - - - -
I Could Never Be Your Woman Quinceañera The Devil Wears Prada New York, I Love You Heights
IMDb User Rating:
IMDb User Rating:
IMDb User Rating:
IMDb User Rating:
IMDb User Rating:
Show more recommendations

Related Links

Full cast and crew Company credits External reviews
News articles IMDb Drama section IMDb UK section

You may report errors and omissions on this page to the IMDb database managers. They will be examined and if approved will be included in a future update. Clicking the 'Edit page' button will take you through a step-by-step process.