IMDb >
Visual Acoustics (2008)
Watch It
Buy it at Amazon
Rent it at Blockbuster.com
Discuss in Boards More at IMDb Pro Add to My Movies Update Data
BETA
Discuss in Boards More at IMDb Pro Add to My Movies Update Data
Quicklinks
Top Links
trailers and videosfull cast and crewtriviaofficial sitesmemorable quotesOverview
main detailscombined detailsfull cast and crewcompany creditstv scheduleAwards & Reviews
user commentsexternal reviewsnewsgroup reviewsawardsuser ratingsparents guiderecommendationsmessage boardPlot & Quotes
plot summarysynopsisplot keywordsAmazon.com summarymemorable quotesFun Stuff
triviagoofssoundtrack listingcrazy creditsalternate versionsmovie connectionsFAQOther Info
merchandising linksbox office/businessrelease datesfilming locationstechnical specslaserdisc detailsDVD detailsliterature listingsNewsDeskPromotional
taglines trailers and videos posters photo galleryExternal Links
showtimesofficial sitesmiscellaneousphotographssound clipsvideo clipsVisual Acoustics (2008) More at IMDbPro »
| Videos (see all 4) |
Overview
User Rating:
Director:
Writers:
Release Date:
9 October 2009 (USA)
more
Genre:
Plot:
Visual Acoustics celebrates the life and career of Julius Shulman, the world's greatest architectural photographer...
more
| add synopsis
Awards:
2 wins
more
NewsDesk:
(7 articles)
“Visual Acoustics”’ Eric Bricker: “The Photographs Sang to Me”
(From indieWIRE - People. 6 October 2009, 8:59 AM, PDT)
“Visual Acoustics”’ Eric Bricker: “The Photographs Sang to Me”
(From indieWIRE - People. 6 October 2009, 7:59 AM, PDT)
(From indieWIRE - People. 6 October 2009, 8:59 AM, PDT)
“Visual Acoustics”’ Eric Bricker: “The Photographs Sang to Me”
(From indieWIRE - People. 6 October 2009, 7:59 AM, PDT)
User Comments:
Speaking Space
more (2 total)
Cast
(Credited cast)| Frances Anderton | ... | Herself | |
| Tom Ford | ... | Himself | |
| Frank O. Gehry | ... | Himself | |
| Dustin Hoffman | ... | Himself-Narrator | |
| Recardo Legorreta | ... | Himself | |
| Kelly Lynch | ... | Herself | |
| Leo Marmol | ... | Himself | |
| Judy McKee | ... | Herself | |
| Raymond Richard Neutra | ... | Himself | |
| Jergen Nogai | ... | Himself | |
| Edward Ruscha | ... | Himself (as Ed Ruscha) | |
| Julius Shulman | ... | Himself | |
| Dante Spinotti | ... | Himself | |
| Angelika Taschen | ... | Herself | |
| Benedikt Taschen | ... | Himself |
Additional Details
Also Known As:
Visual Acoustics (USA) (new title)
more
more
Parents Guide:
Runtime:
83 min
Country:
Language:
Color:
Aspect Ratio:
1.78 : 1 more
Filming Locations:
FAQ
This FAQ is empty. Add the first question.more (2 total)
Message Boards
Discuss this movie with other users on IMDb message board for Visual Acoustics (2008)Recommendations
If you enjoyed this title, our database also recommends:
Show more recommendations
|
|
|
|
|
| The Aviator | Chris & Don. A Love Story | Come On, Leathernecks! | Look | When a Man Sees Red |
|
IMDb User Rating:
|
IMDb User Rating:
|
IMDb User Rating:
|
IMDb User Rating:
|
IMDb User Rating:
|
Related Links
| Full cast and crew | Company credits | External reviews |
| News articles | IMDb Documentary section | IMDb USA section |
| Add this title to MyMovies |




Here's more about the challenge of architecture and cinema. Its not trivial, the problem of what does space mean in films? What narrative role does it play? What vocabulary is relevant?
This film is rather mundane in most ways. It is a biography of a fellow of influence. He's quirky, but always in a desirable way (so far as the entertained audience). His profession why he is important allows for all sorts of images, from interviews, filming of him now and in the past, silly animations, and shots of the buildings he has photographed. As a biography and film, it is something of a yawn, as ordinary as they claim the fellow to be extraordinary. But it gives an excuse to think deeply about architecture and image, about motion, space and narrative.
The context: starting in the 30s in Europe a general philosophical trend toward purity was reflected in schools of architecture. The main notion there was the use of modern materials to escape traditional constraints in form. This would allow a designer to use forms that were pure, natural, deep. Differences among groups were a matter of what path was best in finding purity, nature and depth. It was a good time.
Out of that general influence stepped some designers in Los Angeles who appropriated some principles of purity from one of these schools. Planes, power, open glass, but in an architecturally superficial way. What they did instead was separate these notions of European architecture from the narrative of real explorations into being and self into a narrative of wealth and a privileged lifestyle.
Architectural effects were neutered in the service of selling this "California Lifestyle" and reduced to powerful planes that pushed past invisible glass walls. Purity became "a good view." Rethinking of space became simple openness. What began as a matter of meaning, turned into a matter of advertising a narrative, something of an artificial one. Sure, some of the effects in these buildings were competent, but they were largely in the same business as the television executives who bought the houses. It was a bad time.
Now, along comes a talented photographer, or rather one who would become talented and who would make this architecture famous. Why is illustrative.
His talent is the ability to make a narrative out of certain views of these accommodating structures. Or, if you please, he finds the narrative. This film is wonderful in that when you actually see him work (he still does) you can see him aligning forms so that from front to back always in a one point perspective there is an articulated flow that indicates energy. Many times, he uses that energy to indicate a connection with the environment. It is a masterly art, a good thing.
I did not appreciate the influence this fellow has had on cinematographers, and how they handle architecture. You need the bold planes and deep spaces of "modern" architecture for this relatively simple technique, but you can clearly see it in, say Sasha Vierny, or XX.
As to the value of the film as a film, it is far less competent than the things is speaks of, and draws on witnesses who are not worth listening to. I suppose the filmmakers will be happy if you like this charming old coot and know that somehow he was important. It succeeds at that.
Ted's Evaluation -- 3 of 3: Worth watching.